Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs Eggplant Test comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Adaptavist and Keysight Technologies are both solutions in the Test Management Tools category. Adaptavist is ranked #20, while Keysight Technologies is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.3. Adaptavist holds a 2.0% mindshare in TMT, compared to Keysight Technologies’s 2.7% mindshare. Additionally, 83% of Adaptavist users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of Keysight Technologies users who would recommend it.

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Read 5 Adaptavist Test Management for Jira reviews

948 Views
815 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Eggplant Test

Read 19 Eggplant Test reviews

5,927 Views
1,008 Comparison Views

80% willing to recommend

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Eggplant Test

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 16, 2024

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira and Eggplant Test compete in the software testing and management category. Adaptavist Test Management for Jira has the upper hand in integration with Jira and support, while Eggplant Test stands out for its robust test automation capabilities.

Features: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira offers seamless Jira integration, comprehensive traceability, and advanced reporting features. Users highlight its ability to link test cases with user stories and defects. Eggplant Test stands out for its automation strength, cross-platform testing, and AI-driven capabilities, making it suitable for complex, end-to-end testing scenarios.

Room for Improvement: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira could benefit from a more intuitive interface and better performance with large datasets. Additionally, users see potential improvements in customizability. Eggplant Test users suggest better documentation, a gentler learning curve, and more extensive community support.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira features a straightforward deployment process due to its Jira integration, with high-quality customer support. Eggplant Test is relatively easy to deploy but requires specialized setup for optimal use. Users find its customer service helpful but note longer response times than Adaptavist Test Management for Jira.

Pricing and ROI: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is viewed as cost-effective, especially for Jira users, providing a favorable return on investment through its integration and support. Eggplant Test, while more expensive, delivers significant ROI through its advanced automation features, justifying higher initial setup costs.

To learn more, read our detailed Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Eggplant Test Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Eggplant Test

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,006 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Adaptavist Test Management ...

Ranking in Test Management Tools

20th

Average Rating

7.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Eggplant Test

Ranking in Test Management Tools

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Digital Experience Monitoring (DEM) (13th), Test Automation Tools (10th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Test Management Tools category, the mindshare of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira is 2.0%, down from 2.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Eggplant Test is 2.7%, down from 4.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Management Tools Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Eggplant Test	2.7%
Adaptavist Test Management for Jira	2.0%
Other	95.3%

Test Management Tools

Featured Reviews

Ramakanta Sahu

Director of Product at Indian Institute of Management Bangalore

Has dashboard and reporting features that help us identify and address red flags

I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable. One challenge with integrating Adaptavist Test Management for Jira into workflows is ensuring it accurately tags and incorporates all relevant stories and epics. Sometimes, it’s unclear if the tool considers all dependencies and backlog items, which can affect how risks are assessed. However, it sometimes seems to miss this high-level perspective, which can be a limitation based on how the product is designed. This has been a concern for those who use it regularly, although I don’t manage these aspects personally.

Read full review

Mirza Hussain

Engineer at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees

Has required frequent manual adjustments due to screen resolution but supports simple automation with minimal effort

I would prefer more UFT because it has VB scripting capabilities. While Eggplant Test also has this feature, it's not very user-friendly. I prefer the features of UFT compared to Eggplant Test. When needing to do quick automation, I would prefer Eggplant Test, but otherwise, I would always choose UFT. It depends on the complexity of the tasks. For big problems and complex automation tasks, I would prefer UFT because it has more flexibility and is more effective. With Eggplant Test, if you have very low complexity automation, such as simple click sequences and validation, then it would be preferable; with more complexity, I would not recommend Eggplant Test.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"My impression of the stability is very positive."

"The program is very stable and scalable."

"We don't use technical support. We have an office in Austria that provides us with solutions. Also, this solution is pretty simple and user-friendly. We don't really need help with it."

"The program is very stable, and that is why we have so much success with it."

"Our software development process primarily uses Adaptive Test Management for Jira to monitor real-time risks across all stories and sprint planning. Additionally, we use it to create action plans for high-priority risks."

"You can group test cases together and track the execution of them."

"Test Management for Jira provides a repository for our test cases."

"The features that we like the most are the developer interface and the ability to quickly develop and deploy tests."

"Everything is happening on the layout or display that is used by the user. Eggplant prompts processes, like 'click here,' or 'look for this image.' Eggplant makes it possible for QA people and BAs, working in the actual display, to check if the software is providing the right images, the right text, and the right results. They don't have to go inside the code or to the TCP/IP layer. Everything is happening at the highest level."

"Prior to using the product, all regression testing was done manually for our POS system, and now regression test packs are 70% automated."

"It is easy to set up."

"It has enabled true end-to-end testing."

"It provides very strong cross-platform support."

"We are able to now automate tests, which so far have been manual."

"The solution is a stable one."

More Eggplant Test pros

Cons

"Capability for scalability is basic, it's not as sophisticated as I would like."

"I don't like that you need to use a lot of tabs. One test case takes 15-20 minutes and on Zephyr it takes about 5-10 minutes."

"I would like to see some improvements in Adaptive Test Management for Jira. First, having a recommendation engine or feature that guides handling risks more intuitively rather than relying on manual processes would be helpful. Second, enhancing the connectivity with third-party tools like Teams or Slack would be valuable."

"Lacking visual gadgets that go on a dashboard, pie charts, bar charts and histograms."

"They should work on integrating the solution with AI."

"Something that needs to improve is the model of the licensing. For instance, if you have two packs from two servers, you need to buy two licenses."

"Its performance and stability could be better."

"Eggplant Test is not a stable solution at all in my experience."

"The language is too specific; it is just for Eggplant."

"The execution times are a little slower, and the two-system architecture that we currently follow could be better replaced with a one-system architecture."

"Since there are very few customers in the Indian region, there is no training available, and it's challenging to find skilled talent."

"In terms of additional features, it would be helpful to have one package for all testing. You have the manager, the AI, then you have functional, and about 10 different packages for installing."

"The IDE could be even more full-featured. Because I was a developer, I was very spoiled by either Visual Studio Code or Visual Studio for shortcuts. For example, I was able to say "ctor" and hit Tab and it would create a template of a constructor for me... It would be great, when I want to create a new function, if there were shortcut commands like those that helped create all of the functions, or if there were shortcut features to do any of the complex plans."

"The solution is very heavy, so sometimes my laptop, when I use it, stops and I have to link with it again."

More Eggplant Test cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The licensing is rather expensive for those that have many users."

"The tool's pricing is a bit expensive, considering the kind of risk analysis and visibility we want, given that it's built on top of the Jira platform and other Atlassian products. It's priced slightly higher than similar products, maybe five to ten percent more."

"Make a smart decision about the number of developer- and execution-only licenses you purchase to maximize your budget. We found that going heavier on execution-only licenses has been a way to reduce our costs and maximize our ability to benefit from the software."

"Eggplant Test is a very expensive solution."

"End-to-end testing isn't possible for us because of the licensing problems. It's very expensive, so we only have two development/execution licenses."

"It is scalable, but it is a matter of money in the pocket. You can scale it, but then you have to have additional licenses. The licensing approach of eggPlant is not the best."

"It probably has a yearly license."

"This solution is expensive when compared to the market. However, the reason it is more expensive is because of its stability, high performance, and for its support of any technology."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Management Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,006 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

31%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	14

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?

Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Eggplant Manager?

The price of Eggplant Test is on the higher side, but the benefits it provides make it worth using.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Eggplant Manager?

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText DevPartner vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 12% of the time

PractiTest vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 9% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 9% of the time

Zephyr Enterprise vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 8% of the time

CucumberStudio vs Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

Compared 4% of the time

More Adaptavist Test Management for Jira Competitors

SmartBear TestComplete vs Eggplant Test

Compared 13% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Eggplant Test

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Functional Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 4% of the time

Digital.ai Continuous Testing vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

Qt Squish vs Eggplant Test

Compared 3% of the time

More Eggplant Test Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira

September 2026

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira report

Download Adaptavist Test Management for Jira product report

Buyer's Guide

Eggplant Test

September 2026

Download Eggplant Test product report

Also Known As

No data available

Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence, Eggplant DAI, Eggplant Automation Cloud, Eggplant Manager, Eggplant Mobile, Eggplant Customer Experience Insights

Overview

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira delivers comprehensive test management capabilities with features for step reuse, test case repositories, and risk tracking, enhancing project management through sophisticated metrics and flexible configurations.

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira integrates Microsoft services, offering a repository for test cases and supporting automation tools. Users benefit from risk metrics and flexible configurations for specific project requirements. Enhanced reporting and metrics empower project oversight, providing insights into sprint progress and overarching project goals. The integrated dashboard addresses workflow challenges, facilitating strategic planning. However, areas needing improvement include integration, customization, and intuitive reporting. Users mention the test creation process as time-consuming due to multiple tabs, and licensing could be further streamlined. The disparity between its query functionality and Jira can confuse users, indicating a need for more unified dashboard gadgets and AI-driven test failure analysis.

What are the key features of Adaptavist Test Management for Jira?

Step reuse with Microsoft services streamlines repetitive tasks.
A test case repository simplifies test organization.
Automation tool integration enhances testing efficiency.
Risk metrics and count track project risks effectively.
Flexible add-on configurations meet specific project needs.
Comprehensive reporting and metrics offer high-level project views.
Dashboard features tackle challenges and improve workflow.

What benefits and ROI should users consider?

Streamlined test processes reduce redundancy.
Efficient testing through automation saves time and resources.
Enhanced risk tracking improves project predictability.
Flexible configurations align with team needs.
Data-driven insights support informed decision-making.
Improved strategic planning with proactive dashboard solutions.

In the finance sector, organizations utilize Adaptavist Test Management for Jira primarily for test case writing and execution, often deployed on-premises. The tool aids in contract management and internal business workflows, facilitating department collaboration between teams like marketing and engineering. As an agile lifecycle management plugin, it extends its reach to departments migrating from other management tools, particularly in test management applications.

Adaptavist

Eggplant Test stands out with its AI-driven and image recognition features, facilitating quick bug detection across multiple systems. Its ease of use, coupled with robust integration capabilities, makes it a top choice for efficient and comprehensive testing solutions.

Offering OCR, image recognition, and extensive AI capabilities, Eggplant Test enhances automation and reduces testing time. Known for its versatility, it operates independently from system constraints and supports scriptless testing. With a user-centric design, the tool integrates with platforms like GitHub and operates on diverse operating systems. Despite advancements, considerations include its affordability, installation complexities, and need for better text recognition and stability. Its success is bolstered by seamless scripting, robust reporting features, and the option for digital twin utilization, making it ideal for real-world user action simulations.

What are the most important features of Eggplant Test?

OCR and Image Recognition: Facilitates efficient bug detection and automated testing.
AI Capabilities: Enhances testing efficiency with intelligent automation.
Cross-Platform Operation: Compatible with various operating systems.
Integration Options: Connects easily with GitHub and other platforms.
Scriptless Testing: Simplifies testing for users with limited coding skills.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews?

Reduced Testing Time: Achieves faster testing cycles through automation.
Improved Quality Assurance: Enhances reliability with refined testing methods.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies navigation and operation for users.
Robust Reporting: Offers comprehensive insights into test outcomes.

Industries utilize Eggplant Test primarily for regression and GUI automation testing, especially in desktop applications. Its capacity for post-development validation and vulnerability scanning supports businesses with testers having minimal coding experience. Deployed on virtual machines, it effectively tests web pages, Windows apps, and streaming devices, simulating real-world user actions efficiently. Eggplant Test's role in simplifying robotic process automation and functional testing is significant, offering a spectrum of operational support across varied sectors.

Keysight Technologies

Sample Customers

IBM, John Lewis, Trip Advisor, Netgear, Bill and Melinda Gates foundation, Sapient

FUJIFILM Group, NEC Personal Computers

Buyer's Guide

Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Eggplant Test

August 2026

Free Report: Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Eggplant Test

Find out what your peers are saying about Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Eggplant Test and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,006 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Adaptavist Test Management for Jira vs. Eggplant Test report.

See our list of best Test Management Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Management Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.