Actional vs Loupe Logging comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
186 views|147 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Gibraltar Software Logo
93 views|70 comparisons
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and Loupe Logging based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability.
To learn more, read our detailed Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability Report (Updated: April 2024).
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Use Loupe Logging?
Ranking
Views
186
Comparisons
147
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
93
Comparisons
70
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Learn More
Aurea
Video Not Available
Overview
Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.

Rest Easy with Loupe - Monitor, Find and Fix errors the first time. Add Loupe Logging to your .NET or Java application to capture telemetry in production, providing you with the most relevant information needed to fix problems quickly.

Sample Customers
Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
Constellation an exelon company, Mettler Toledo, Epsilon, Stadium One, Valutec Good For Wood
Buyer's Guide
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
April 2024
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Updated: April 2024.
768,578 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Actional is ranked 72nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Loupe Logging is ranked 95th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Actional is rated 9.0, while Loupe Logging is rated 0.0. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas Loupe Logging is most compared with .

See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.