Actional vs IBM Application Performance Management comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
183 views|145 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
IBM Logo
1,276 views|796 comparisons
62% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and IBM Application Performance Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Actional vs. IBM Application Performance Management Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Anonymous User
Daniel Tamiru
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "IBM APM is one of the cheaper products on the market, while everything necessary to get started is included in the license."
  • "The licensing fees can be paid every six months or on a yearly basis."
  • "As I previously indicated, I initiated the IBM and uncovered all its elements. Consequently, I'm not inclined towards a licensing approach."
  • More IBM Application Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Top Answer:They should focus on potentially enhancing the dashboard to make it more contemporary and adding some customization options. Furthermore, there might be room for improvement in the pricing policy. The… more »
    Top Answer:I monitor business applications for more than four end users.
    Ranking
    Views
    183
    Comparisons
    145
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    1,276
    Comparisons
    796
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    298
    Rating
    6.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM APM
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.
    The IBM Application Performance Management portfolio provides visibility, control and automation of your mission-critical applications. It helps pinpoint the root cause of application's issue more quickly and resolve the problem. The integrated capabilities cover the five key areas: discovery, end-use experience, transaction tracking, enterprise diagnostics and analytics. It also easily monitors applications to ensure optimal performance to extend your hybrid management environment capabilities, to measure the customer experience from multiple locations and to further eliminate blind spots in your application environment.
    Sample Customers
    Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
    Mibtree, EatDrinkDeals.com, IT Performance Advisor
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm19%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Government12%
    University7%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business67%
    Midsize Enterprise11%
    Large Enterprise22%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise69%
    Buyer's Guide
    Actional vs. IBM Application Performance Management
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. IBM Application Performance Management and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,789 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Actional is ranked 75th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while IBM Application Performance Management is ranked 54th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews. Actional is rated 9.0, while IBM Application Performance Management is rated 6.4. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of IBM Application Performance Management writes "A multi-functional solution but has poor stability and performance-related issues". Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas IBM Application Performance Management is most compared with Instana Dynamic APM, Dynatrace, BMC Compuware Strobe, IBM Tivoli Composite Application Manager and AppDynamics. See our Actional vs. IBM Application Performance Management report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.