Actional vs Avada Software Infrared360 comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Aurea Logo
183 views|145 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Avada Software Logo
246 views|133 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Actional and Avada Software Infrared360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Actional vs. Avada Software Infrared360 Report (Updated: May 2024).
769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
Information Not Available
  • "Because the licensing is at the QMGR level, you need to have at least a small cushion of licenses for occasional enterprise needs."
  • "Our internal budget calculation model incorporates the pricing per endpoint for any new projects. However, as our footprint for distributed queue managers shrinks as part of our shared middleware hub deployment, the initial licensing and support costs have been reduced over the last five years."
  • "Avada Software's licensing metric is very good because the license fees are based on the number of connections (which have not increased for us very much over the years) rather than the CPU processing power (which increases significantly whenever our hardware is upgraded) or the number of users (which has increased for us a lot since our original purchase)."
  • "Start small, then increase licensing later as per your demand."
  • More Avada Software Infrared360 Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Ranking
    Views
    183
    Comparisons
    145
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Views
    246
    Comparisons
    133
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Buyer's Guide
    Actional vs. Avada Software Infrared360
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. Avada Software Infrared360 and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Infrared360
    Learn More
    Aurea
    Video Not Available
    Avada Software
    Video Not Available
    Overview
    Actional (CX-Monitor) automatically discovers both systems and processes associated with your active customer journeys or applications and gives you real-time operational profiles and analysis of each system and process.

    Avada Software specializes in Enterprise Middleware solutions. Founded by some pioneers in SOA, MQ and J2EE technology, Avada’s Flagship product, Infrared360, is a holistic & innovative private cloud enabled portal providing self-service administration, monitoring, load testing, auditing & statistical reporting for Enterprise Middleware including IBM’s middleware stack of MQ, IIB (message broker), WAS, and Datapower, as well as other applications servers such as  JBoss, TC Server, Weblogic, and other messaging technologies such as Tibco EMS and Kafka*.

    Accessed via any web browser on any device, Infrared360 is a single web application, yet scales to 2500+ endpoints without deploying anything (no agents, no scripts) to those endpoints.

    Using trusted ‘spaces’ and delegated visibility and control, the portal uniquely provides different business units or even different application users virtual ‘spaces’ in which to work.  Within those spaces are only the objects and resources the user has been granted visibility.  Role policy dictates permissions on those resources.

    It is the ONLY Enterprise Messaging Solution with a built in SOA engine that lets you leverage internal and external services for managing and correcting problems within your middleware messaging environment.                 

      *Kafka coming soon 

    Sample Customers
    Proximus, Air France-KLM, Barratt Developments, Freedom Mortgage
    USBank, Southwest Airlines, Visiting Nurse Services of New York, Aon Hewitt, Parker Hannifin,  Cantonal Bank of Zurich (ZKB), Hagemeyer NA, and many others
    Top Industries
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm73%
    Government27%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm33%
    Insurance Company11%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Transportation Company6%
    Company Size
    No Data Available
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise36%
    Large Enterprise36%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise79%
    Buyer's Guide
    Actional vs. Avada Software Infrared360
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Actional vs. Avada Software Infrared360 and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    769,599 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Actional is ranked 75th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Avada Software Infrared360 is ranked 71st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability. Actional is rated 9.0, while Avada Software Infrared360 is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Actional writes "Decent tool, needs additional integration with automation tool". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Avada Software Infrared360 writes "An offsite team performs a daily infrastructure health check and sends reports to the technical/management teams. ". Actional is most compared with CentraSite, whereas Avada Software Infrared360 is most compared with IBM MQ and Dynatrace. See our Actional vs. Avada Software Infrared360 report.

    See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.

    We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.