Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

ACL Analytics vs XM Cyber comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
ACL Analytics quickly recoups costs, enhances efficiency, reduces audit hours, and eliminates alternative tools, benefiting operational workflows.
Sentiment score
7.3
XM Cyber enhances vulnerability management by reducing staffing needs and improving risk remediation, saving over $60,000 annually.
If an auditor was normally budgeted to take 600 hours, we have implemented a solution to take those audit hours down to 200 hours.
It has proven value in terms of time saving and efficiency, so much so that using open-source tools like Python is not necessary.
There was a specific issue that our other security tooling did not pick up, but XM Cyber did.
It's reduced the timescale to remediate vulnerabilities that are identified as representing a high risk.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
ACL Analytics support is praised for effectiveness, though regional differences and occasional delays affect overall response times.
Sentiment score
6.3
XM Cyber provides outstanding customer support, praised for responsiveness despite some organizational challenges during internal changes.
This rating is due to slow response times; it would take more than 5 days to respond.
For major technical issues, resolutions typically took six to eight hours.
I escalate many questions to technical support, and they usually respond to me.
The customer support is fantastic; it's probably some of the best we've received across all our security vendors.
Customer support for XM Cyber is good, responsive, and it follows up on issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.1
ACL Analytics is praised for scalability but faces mixed reviews on vendor limits and potential system crashes.
Sentiment score
7.1
XM Cyber's scalable, agent-based model is intuitive, reliable, and suits large enterprises, fostering user confidence through responsive security.
It is a vendor application, and you do not have much power in terms of what we can adjust.
Its scalability is great; it's easy to deploy and fully scalable.
We have not experienced any issues with scalability or reached its limits.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.5
ACL Analytics is stable with minor issues easily resolved, reliable performance, and options like secondary nodes enhancing uptime.
Sentiment score
7.8
XM Cyber is stable and scalable, efficiently resolving issues without disrupting performance in complex IT environments.
I would rate how stable this solution is as a 10.
It didn't take more than half an hour for our IT team to resolve the issue.
I occasionally experience lag when extracting Excel sheets after formulating and setting up the required data.
We have quite a complex and large IT estate, and we've certainly experienced no limitations or problems arising from the ability of XM Cyber's product to scale across that estate.
 

Room For Improvement

ACL Analytics needs enhancements in usability, visualization, security, and affordability to better support non-technical users and improve accessibility.
Users seek improved integration, enhanced vulnerability exposure, better pricing, and AI tool integration in XM Cyber.
It would also be beneficial if ACL Analytics included features similar to Tableau for data presentation.
While we had e-learning resources to assist, a more intuitive platform would be beneficial.
We have an issue with the hard coding of passwords in ACL Analytics. You do not have an interface where you can enter a password and then it can be encrypted when you enter it.
We push the boundaries with digital twins; I understand XM Cyber uses a similar concept of graph databases to map environments.
The part that can be improved is the mobile exposure and the IBM i specific equipment.
We intend to develop closer integration between XM Cyber and the other tools that help us tackle the issue of threats and vulnerabilities across our IT estate.
 

Setup Cost

ACL Analytics costs $6,000 annually, seen as expensive individually, but offers value for organizations with included features.
I would rate the pricing of ACL Analytics as a 10.
ACL Analytics is quite affordable compared to the market.
For example, a thousand dollars last year cost three thousand pounds, but today it is five thousand pounds.
We have a large, complicated estate, and in the licensing discussions, we were keen not to have the cost balloon because of the complication, the number of PCs and servers that we have.
 

Valuable Features

ACL Analytics efficiently tests data, integrates sources, and enhances audit processes with automation, robust control, and visualization capabilities.
XM Cyber enhances security by simulating attacks, prioritizing risks, and streamlining management, significantly improving operational efficiency and reducing exposure.
The most valuable feature of ACL Analytics is its error suggestion capability, where it indicates problems if operations are incorrect.
With over a million clients, this feature helps tremendously in identifying fraud detection in client accounts.
I can access data from various sources, both relational and non-relational databases, using one tool.
Our loss exposure amount has reduced significantly, leading to two big wins: our loss exposure amount has gone down, and we have direct savings from focusing our team's time on what's important, allowing them to work on other business benefits and generate value for the company.
By far, the best feature of XM Cyber is being able to map out the way vulnerabilities can be exploited based on what they call the choke points in the network where the path that a bad actor would take comes closest to assets within our environment that are most vulnerable but also most valuable.
XM Cyber allows us to quantify the risk, and we are able to track remediation, so we can quantify the risk at an executive level and also to a technical IT team.
 

Categories and Ranking

ACL Analytics
Ranking in Continuous Controls Monitoring
1st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
GRC (3rd)
XM Cyber
Ranking in Continuous Controls Monitoring
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (31st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (20th), Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Continuous Controls Monitoring category, the mindshare of ACL Analytics is 28.6%, up from 25.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of XM Cyber is 1.3%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Continuous Controls Monitoring Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
ACL Analytics28.6%
XM Cyber1.3%
Other70.1%
Continuous Controls Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

John Erian - PeerSpot reviewer
Identifyies fraud efficiently through automated report analysis
I believe the formulas and scripting language in ACL Analytics need development to be easier for me to use. I want to see more robotic reports generated automatically, rather than relying heavily on scripting. It would also be beneficial if ACL Analytics included features similar to Tableau for data presentation.
Stephen Owen - PeerSpot reviewer
Has significantly improved risk visibility and optimized remediation efforts across dynamic environments
We tightly integrate with APIs, consuming feeds and open source data. We have integrated with XM Cyber, and we are elevating ourselves with AI and MCP tools as we view this as a forerunner to reducing the workload for our agents and IT staff. We're pushing all our security partners to provide AI and MCP tools. Our vision is for them to offer a chat interface where a junior IT or an experienced infrastructure engineer can ask for what needs to be patched next without using an interface. Their current interface is very usable and professional, ranking in the top tier of applications. Their reporting is good, offering custom reports, and their API integration is a new capability that serves us well. We have high expectations for the next generation, such as a chat interface to ask questions. However, everything has been very good. We push the boundaries with digital twins; I understand XM Cyber uses a similar concept of graph databases to map environments. I would like access to that and querying languages, enabling more informed business decisions. XM Cyber sees much of our estate, which is beneficial for making informed decisions, and we can harness those insights and data for business analytics. For instance, it could help us gain insights into change management—if a particular server impacts another and that server is supported by yet another server, we could glean significant insights for change management meetings.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Controls Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Government
14%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Computer Software Company
11%
Insurance Company
8%
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Retailer
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business1
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACL Analytics?
The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spr...
What needs improvement with ACL Analytics?
We have an issue with the hard coding of passwords in ACL Analytics. You do not have an interface where you can enter a password and then it can be encrypted when you enter it. Every time you enter...
What do you like most about XM Cyber?
The platform's most valuable feature is attack simulation.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for XM Cyber?
We have to pay standard licensing fees. There are no additional costs. It is an expensive product. I rate the pricing a seven out of ten.
What needs improvement with XM Cyber?
There are many interesting things about XM Cyber, but the part that can be improved is the mobile exposure and the IBM i specific equipment.
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

ACL
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Essar Group, Dean Foods, Lafarge North America, Austrian Ministry of Finance
Hamburg Port Authority, Plymouth Rock Corporation
Find out what your peers are saying about ACL Analytics vs. XM Cyber and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.
869,566 professionals have used our research since 2012.