ACL Analytics vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center comparison

Diligent and Interfacing Technologies Corporation are both solutions in the GRC category. Diligent is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while Interfacing Technologies Corporation is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.0. Diligent holds a 3.1% mindshare in G, compared to Interfacing Technologies Corporation’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Diligent users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Interfacing Technologies Corporation users who would recommend it.

ACL Analytics

Read 11 ACL Analytics reviews

2,668 Views
1,921 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Interfacing Technologies En...

Read 2 Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center reviews

280 Views
39 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

ACL Analytics

Interfacing Technologies En...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between ACL Analytics and Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two GRC solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed ACL Analytics vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,370 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ACL Analytics

Ranking in GRC

3rd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Continuous Controls Monitoring (1st)

Interfacing Technologies En...

Ranking in GRC

22nd

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools (29th), Business Process Management (BPM) (34th), Quality Management Software (40th), Document Management Software (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2025, in the GRC category, the mindshare of ACL Analytics is 3.1%, down from 4.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center is 0.3%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

GRC Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
ACL Analytics	3.1%
Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center	0.3%
Other	96.6%

GRC

Featured Reviews

John Erian

Team leader - Internal Audit sector at HD Bank

Identifyies fraud efficiently through automated report analysis

I believe the formulas and scripting language in ACL Analytics need development to be easier for me to use. I want to see more robotic reports generated automatically, rather than relying heavily on scripting. It would also be beneficial if ACL Analytics included features similar to Tableau for data presentation.

Read full review

SantoshKulkarni1

Consultant at a consultancy with 11-50 employees

A Robust Solution with Enhanced Automation and Process Improvement Identification Capabilities

I recommend that users invest more time in the initial setup of the process architecture within the tool. It is crucial to spend time designing how the process architecture works as it significantly impacts how the tool behaves. This upfront investment can prevent the need for extensive reworking later on.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is very flexible and has hundreds of functions."

"It improved my organization using an automated audit revision with scripts."

"ACL Analytics is a great application that helps me analyze data more effectively compared to other tools like Excel."

"I did not have any problems with the stability of ACL Analytics."

"We have seen a return on investment as we have mostly reduced working hours for the audit engagements."

"Initial setup is straightforward."

"I recommend ACL Analytics because it makes work easier and is user-friendly."

"I like the fact that in the duplicate section, I can find matches, and I can find situations where certain cells or certain cell points match, but there's a difference as well between two different records."

More ACL Analytics pros

"One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processes. There are two valuable aspects. First, setting up the process architecture is commendable. Second, not having to maintain different versions of processes is a notable benefit. The solution is stable. The support team is responsive."

"The most valuable feature is the integrated manner in which all the capabilities of the Enterprise Process Center platform work together and make it easier to complete the documentation of processes."

Cons

"The visualization capabilities in ACL Analytics need more variety and features."

"Reporting and presentation of information directly to solutions, such as PowerPoint."

"The ease of use could be better."

"Currently, the platform is not very comfortable for users coming from a non-technical or non-coding background."

"The tool's pricing is quite high. When I purchased the software, I constantly contacted the representatives. I requested a single license, but they informed me that only packages of three licenses were available. This made it very difficult for us to manage the cost, especially given the economic challenges in our country."

"It would be beneficial if the software could improve its capabilities when extracting data from databases, particularly for those who may not be familiar with SQL queries."

"The product's pricing has increased over the years."

"I believe the formulas and scripting language in ACL Analytics need development to be easier for me to use."

More ACL Analytics cons

"As with all such platforms, Enterprise Process Center is a complex tool and there are many capabilities and features that take time to learn."

"However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights into process functionality. Additionally, there's always room for enhancement in the user interface."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing for me as an individual seems a lot. For our organization, the price is okay. It's about $6,000 a year. I don't know of any additional costs."

"The price of $5,000 is high, and transferring money from one country to another, particularly in dollars, is challenging due to high exchange rates. Although we managed to purchase it then, the lack of a single license option and the high cost were issues."

"My advice for anybody who is implementing this product is to understand what options you believe you are going to want to implement and rollout in the first three to five years, but spend the most time understanding what the set-up costs and pricing will be in the first two or maybe three."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which GRC solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Government

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Insurance Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ACL Analytics?

The tool's most valuable feature is its ability to import files from other software packages. Its reporting and visualization capabilities have made our reporting easier. Importing results into spr...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ACL Analytics?

I would rate the pricing of ACL Analytics as a 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ACL Analytics?

We have an issue with the hard coding of passwords in ACL Analytics. You do not have an interface where you can enter a password and then it can be encrypted when you enter it. Every time you enter...

See all answers

What do you like most about Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

One notable software-related benefit from a user perspective is our improved ability to identify opportunities for automation and process enhancement just by gaining a clearer view of the processe...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

While we have yet to explore the tool's capabilities fully, I can't think of any immediate drawbacks. However, on the process mining side, there's potential for improvement to gain deeper insights ...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center?

We use the solution for finance processes, specifically for accounts payable and accounts receivable.

See all answers

Comparisons

CaseWare IDEA SymSure Monitor vs ACL Analytics

Compared 37% of the time

Diligent One Platform (formerly Highbond) vs ACL Analytics

Compared 24% of the time

MEGA HOPEX vs ACL Analytics

Compared 10% of the time

SAP BusinessObjects GRC vs ACL Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

Workiva Wdesk vs ACL Analytics

Compared 8% of the time

More ACL Analytics Competitors

iGrafx Process360 Live Platform vs Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Compared 100% of the time

More Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics

September 2025

Download ACL Analytics product report

Buyer's Guide

BI (Business Intelligence) Tools

August 2025

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report

Download Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center product report

Also Known As

ACL

Enterprise Process Center

Overview

ACL Analytics connects you to any data source, and lets you run sophisticated risk analytics and detect anomalies or patterns that you simply can't illuminate with any amount of random sampling, spreadsheet ninjutsu or generic business intelligence. It's designed for you, the GRC professional.

Diligent

Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center by Interfacing Technologies Corporation integrates AI-powered enterprise software for managing operations, ensuring compliance, and driving improvement in regulated organizations.

Combining QMS, DMS, BPM, and GRC within a single platform, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center standardizes processes and reduces risk. It provides real-time insights and adapts to changing regulations, designed for industries like aerospace and life sciences. With ISO 27001 certification, GDPR, and CFR Part 11 compliance, it meets strict global security standards. Recognized by Gartner as a leader in DTO solutions, this platform offers precision and transparency through 25 years of expertise.

What features make Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center valuable?

Quality Management: Enhances efficiency and compliance in processes.
Document Management: Centralizes information and ensures traceability.
Business Process Management: Automates workflows for operational excellence.
Governance, Risk & Compliance: Provides control and audit readiness.

What should users look for in reviews?

Operational Insight: Real-time insights into processes for better decisions.
Risk Reduction: Minimizes compliance risks and enhances security.
Adaptability: Quickly responds to changes in regulatory landscapes.

In aerospace and life sciences, Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center implementation ensures compliance and operational control. It's crucial for manufacturing and government sectors seeking adaptability and precision due to their complex regulatory requirements.

Interfacing Technologies Corporation

Sample Customers

Essar Group, Dean Foods, Lafarge North America, Austrian Ministry of Finance

Pepsi-Cola Manufacturing International Ltd., Pfizer Deutschland GmbH, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Bayer S.p.A., KPMG, Royal Australian Air, Orange

Buyer's Guide

ACL Analytics vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

September 2025

Free Report: ACL Analytics vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center

Find out what your peers are saying about ACL Analytics vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,370 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ACL Analytics vs. Interfacing Technologies Enterprise Process Center report.

See our list of best GRC vendors.

We monitor all GRC reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.