A10 Thunder TPS vs Prolexic comparison

A10 Networks and Akamai are both solutions in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category. A10 Networks is ranked #17 with an average rating of 7.5, while Akamai is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0. A10 Networks holds a 1.9% mindshare in DDOS, compared to Akamai’s 3.1% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of A10 Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Akamai users who would recommend it.

A10 Thunder TPS

Read 15 A10 Thunder TPS reviews

858 Views
858 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Prolexic

Read 5 Prolexic reviews

1,390 Views
1,362 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

A10 Thunder TPS

Prolexic

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 5, 2024

Prolexic and A10 Thunder TPS are competing products in the DDoS protection category. Prolexic seems to have the upper hand in customer support and overall cost-effectiveness, while A10 Thunder TPS stands out for its extensive features and robust integration capabilities.

Features: Prolexic offers comprehensive DDoS mitigation with cloud-based solutions, rapid response times, and global coverage. A10 Thunder TPS provides advanced traffic management, analytics, and rich integration features, ideal for organizations requiring detailed network control and visibility.

Room for Improvement: Prolexic could enhance its feature set by incorporating more advanced analytics and integration capabilities. Additionally, a broader range of customization options could be beneficial. For A10 Thunder TPS, simplifying its deployment process and reducing setup complexity would be advantageous. Offering more cost-effective pricing tiers and improving documentation for features could further improve the service.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Prolexic offers a straightforward deployment process supported by attentive customer service, facilitating quick implementation. A10 Thunder TPS requires more complex setup and configuration but compensates with a dedicated support network focused on technical assistance.

Pricing and ROI: Prolexic is competitive in pricing, delivering solid ROI due to its efficient services and support. A10 Thunder TPS, despite higher initial costs, presents a long-term investment opportunity with its sophisticated features and scalability.

To learn more, read our detailed A10 Thunder TPS vs. Prolexic Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

A10 Thunder TPS vs. Prolexic

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

A10 Thunder TPS

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

17th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Prolexic

Ranking in Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

11th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection category, the mindshare of A10 Thunder TPS is 1.9%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Prolexic is 3.1%, down from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Prolexic	3.1%
A10 Thunder TPS	1.9%
Other	95.0%

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

Featured Reviews

reviewer1126782

Information Technology Security Engineer at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Management console adds value and technical support delivers timely solutions

I had issues with the user interface because, when putting settings up, the system asked me for strange things like virtual local networks that I didn't create. For example, I set an NTP server, and after some clicks, a message appeared stating 'setup is incorrect'. It asked for a VLAN even though no VLANs were created. We had to find workarounds for issues like A10 blocking necessary traffic, sometimes leading to decreased security, because it was the simplest way to deal with them. This was a real issue. A more flexible policy for demo licenses would also be helpful.

Read full review

Gavin Pinho

Privacy & Risk Management Vice President, Information Security at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees

Has faced challenges with bot detection while benefiting from strong threat monitoring and compliance support

Akamai's most valuable features include being industry recognized and PCI compliant, which is really great; their cloud is PCI compliant, and having a vendor that is PCI certified is crucial for organizations focused on PCI compliance. We utilize the real-time monitoring of the solution. Real-time monitoring helps us identify network vulnerabilities by allowing us to see a spike in traffic and understand the traffic levels compared to this time last month or last week. If we notice a sudden increase, we investigate further to determine if it indicates a DDoS attack or a card testing situation. In terms of threat detection capabilities, they are very good because Akamai has a SOC service that we have tapped into for active threat detection and threat hunting, and they monitor everything carefully 24/7. Scrubbing is done by Akamai as a backend service, and we utilize their SOC, which is a service that you pay additional fees for, allowing us to have our queries prioritized. Prolexic features help maintain business continuity during high-volume attacks by having built-in threat detection capabilities in its bot detection and other functionalities, as attacks usually occur through intelligent bots trying to infiltrate the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We selected the solution because of its programmable automated defense using RESTful API. We didn't want to connect to the box. We wanted to be able to do some automation. We wanted to have our own portal because we wanted to connect our customers to our own UI using the A10 API. It has been good and exactly what we need."

"The most valuable feature of A10 Thunder TPS is load balancing."

"The primary benefit that we see from their systems is that their filtering technology has the ability to detect and drop the malicious traffic from the legitimate traffic with a high success rate. That, in combination with the very small effort needed to manage their systems, are the two most important benefits to us."

"The GUI is very use-friendly. You can configure it through CLI or GUI, they give you an option to choose. It's a good solution in terms of the appliance itself. It's very light compared to other brands that offer DDoS solutions."

"The solution's support is one of the coolest things about the product. I"

"I had a rather positive experience with A10 Networks Support Service."

"The response time to an attack is instant. We've used some outsourced solutions in the past, out in the cloud, that weren't so quick. But it's all within our control now. We control how fast it mitigates."

"We can keep track of all the customer's requirements. We can forecast our trails and we can forecast our overall financial things."

More A10 Thunder TPS pros

"Akamai's most valuable features include being industry recognized and PCI compliant, which is really great; their cloud is PCI compliant, and having a vendor that is PCI certified is crucial for organizations focused on PCI compliance."

"The solution does not have hardware or maintenance requirements and is very easy to scale."

Cons

"We currently do not use the solution's machine-learning-powered Zero-day Automated Protection because of an issue with it... We also use the aGalaxy platform, which is a management platform for the TPS devices. The issue is that some TPS features were added at the TPS level but weren't carried over to aGalaxy, and we manage all of our devices through aGalaxy. So we can't actually use some of the new features that are available on the TPS because that functionality doesn't exist in aGalaxy. That is one of my biggest complaints."

"I rate Thunder TPS seven out of 10 for scalability."

"The upgrade process for the boxes is not efficient. We have to go through the A10 aGalaxy where we have issues, like timeouts. They told me it was fixed in the latest version, but I tried to do it on the Portal and it is not working all the time."

"It is very difficult to implement. It should be made a bit easier to implement. There is also a lack of resources on the internet. They need to develop more resources."

"They have a cloud scrubbing feature that redirects the traffic if the on-prem appliance can't accommodate a large amount of traffic but it's not available where we are."

"We have had some issues with implementation. So, it is the only area that needs improvement."

"The problem here is when you buy another box from A10, they want to put Thunder TPS to run, and it works okay, after which we cannot block it for another solution to be used, which is a problem for me where improvements are needed."

"Its documentation could be better."

More A10 Thunder TPS cons

"In bot management, there are times when attackers find ways to bypass Akamai, which is a continuously evolving challenge."

"The solution needs additional product options for small and medium enterprises."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is very reasonable."

"Pricing was much higher with Arbor (APS) for the same type of solution."

"We had a customer who was down for six hours and the loss of revenue for him was three times the price he was paying for us per year. The customer just said, "I don't care about paying you because on only one attack I saved money. It's three times better than losing money.""

"We did a price survey, and compared to other solutions, A10 Thunder TPS wasn't cheap."

"We may need to pay fifty percent more if we purchase other solutions. For the payments made to A10 Thunder TPS, we have received three-year support."

"The financials are always a challenge with this type of technology. That's not really a product-functionality thing but it's the area where we push A10 the most."

"The tool is expensive. If one is low price and ten is expensive, I rate the tool's price as a ten."

"The pricing is a pay-as-you-go model that is charged by the hour."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

40%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Financial Services Firm

28%

Comms Service Provider

17%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	6
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for A10 Thunder TPS?

I have not seen specific prices, like $10,000 or $20,000. A frustrating aspect is the lack of demo versions. The vendor insists on commercial licenses despite requests for demo licenses. The global...

See all answers

What needs improvement with A10 Thunder TPS?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for A10 Thunder TPS?

Currently, I have a test setup. A10 Thunder TPS ( /products/a10-thunder-tps-reviews ) works in a chain with a Check Point firewall and a Juniper MX router. Recently, we had a presentation from a ve...

See all answers

Which is the best DDoS protection solution for a big ISP for monitoring and mitigating?

Cloudflare. We are moving from Akamai prolexic to Cloudflare. Cloudflare anycast network outperforms Akamai static GRE tunnels. We have decreased site load times on Mobile 3G from 8 to 1,6 seconds ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Akamai Prolexic Routed?

For the DDoS protection, I don't see any areas for improvement because they are pretty solid there, though in bot management, there are times when attackers find ways to bypass Akamai, which is a c...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai Prolexic Routed?

The main use case for DDoS protection is to mitigate risks, and there are multiple ways Akamai provides DDoS protection; one is application-based DDoS protection and the other is volumetric DDoS pr...

See all answers

Comparisons

Arbor DDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 36% of the time

Radware DDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 12% of the time

F5 BIG-IP Advanced Firewall Manager (AFM) vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 10% of the time

Cloudflare vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 9% of the time

Fortinet FortiDDoS vs A10 Thunder TPS

Compared 7% of the time

More A10 Thunder TPS Competitors

Akamai App and API Protector vs Prolexic

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare vs Prolexic

Compared 20% of the time

Cloudflare One vs Prolexic

Compared 12% of the time

Arbor DDoS vs Prolexic

Compared 11% of the time

AWS Shield vs Prolexic

Compared 8% of the time

More Prolexic Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

A10 Thunder TPS

January 2026

Download A10 Thunder TPS product report

Buyer's Guide

Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection

January 2026

Download Prolexic product report

Also Known As

No data available

Akamai Prolexic Routed

Overview

The Thunder TPS is a family of high-performance DDoS defense solutions that detect and mitigate multi-vector DDoS attacks. Unlike traditional DDoS defenses that leave a wake of collateral damage against users, Thunder TPS applies a source-based defense-in-depth mitigation pipeline. This multimodal defense that includes actionable DDoS weapons intelligence, operator definable adaptive policies, and machine learning-powered Zero-Day Automated Protection (ZAP) blocks attackers while protecting real users.

The Thunder TPS is uniquely suited for communication service providers, online gaming, and enterprise network operators who protect large networks and need compact solutions with faster response from a fully automated, zero-touch defense during an attack.

A10 Networks

Akamai Prolexic is a cloud-based DDoS protection solution that defends your data center and hybrid infrastructure to ensure availability and uptime. It provides comprehensive port and protocol protection against the broadest range of DDoS attacks, including high-bandwidth sustained attacks and complex multi-vector attacks. Prolexic is available as an always-on or on-demand service, contains a Network Cloud Firewall, and offers flexible integration models based on your desired security posture across hybrid origins. Prolexic is backed by a proven platform with more than 20 Tbps of dedicated DDoS defense capacity and our 24/7/365 global SOCC for a fully managed solution.

Prolexic stops DDoS attacks closer to the source to maximize performance for users and to maintain network resiliency through cloud distribution. Instead of originating advertisements for your prefixes from your cloud/data centers, you’ll make either a border gateway protocol route advertisement change or DNS redirection (A record or CNAME record) to originate from one of many Akamai scrubbing centers globally. Your intended traffic is then routed to the user via Anycast through the closest scrubbing center. Prolexic will inspect the traffic to determine if it is good or bad, and apply proactive and/or custom mitigation controls designed to stop attacks instantly if needed. This ensures fast and accurate DDoS protection. Clean traffic is then returned to the customer origin via GRE tunnels, Layer 2 VLAN connections, and/or VIP-to-origin back-end mapping with little perceived latency. Prolexic also features a Network Cloud Firewall that allows IT teams to auto generate or manually manage access control lists.

Akamai

Sample Customers

DDoS defense solution trusted for more than 200 service providers, online gaming, and enterprises including; Bungie, Comcast, KDDI Corporation, Leaseweb, Microsoft Azure, NTT Docomo, Softbank, Turkcell Superonline, Verizon and more.

Fidor Bank

Buyer's Guide

A10 Thunder TPS vs. Prolexic

December 2025

Free Report: A10 Thunder TPS vs. Prolexic

Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Thunder TPS vs. Prolexic and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our A10 Thunder TPS vs. Prolexic report.

See our list of best Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection vendors.

We monitor all Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Protection reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.