No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

360 Safeguard vs Bitdefender Security for AWS comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

360 Safeguard
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
32nd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Bitdefender Security for AWS
Ranking in Anti-Malware Tools
6th
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
16
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Anti-Malware Tools category, the mindshare of 360 Safeguard is 1.4%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Bitdefender Security for AWS is 1.1%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Anti-Malware Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Bitdefender Security for AWS1.1%
360 Safeguard1.4%
Other97.5%
Anti-Malware Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Walter Fang - PeerSpot reviewer
Managing Partner at Assistencial Consulting
A very stable tool that offers security and protection, along with automatic updates
The product's initial setup was very straightforward. When it comes to the time taken for the deployment part of 360 Safeguard, once in the back-end, the tool normally shows a message and shows the upgrade or whatever is running the back-end that I might not have noticed. The solution is deployed on the cloud. I could not even notice the deployment process because I think it just somehow showed up in my system one day, and it worked with my Windows system very smoothly and seamlessly. When I install Windows Office and choose Office 365, I see 360 Safeguard installed.
Abhimanyu Das - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior Cybersecurity Engineer at Kyndryl
Bitdefender Security for AWS is a cloud‑native antimalware and workload‑protection service that secures EC2 instances on AWS with minimal performance impact via off‑loaded scanning and centralized man
Bitdefender Security for AWS could be improved by broadening its scope beyond basic antimalware on EC2 and adding features that better match how modern cloud workloads are built and run. Right now it’s focused on lightweight, off‑loaded scanning for EC2 instances, which is strong, but there are a few obvious gaps that customers often mention indirectly. From a feature‑roadmap perspective, the most useful additions would probably be deeper cloud‑native workload support, such as antimalware‑style protection or integrity checks for containers (ECS/EKS pods) and serverless components like Lambda, not just traditional EC2 VMs. Many teams today mix EC2 with containers and serverless, so being able to manage at least policy and visibility across those layers from the same GravityZone‑style console would make the product feel more comprehensive. Another area to improve is integration with AWS security and observability services: tighter bridging to GuardDuty, Security Hub, and CloudTrail so that Bitdefender detections and scan events can flow directly into native AWS tools instead of relying only on GravityZone or a separate SIEM. This would reduce duplication, simplify alert routing, and help teams enforce consistent security‑and‑compliance rules across the board. Technically, it would also help if the product added lighter agent‑less or partially agent‑less options for scanning or integrity‑checking data and snapshots, similar to how some cloud‑security platforms inspect EBS volumes or backups without requiring a long‑running agent on every instance. This would appeal to teams that want antimalware‑style coverage but minimize the number of agents or services running on critical workloads. Finally, better cloud‑security posture and configuration insights (think basic CSPM‑style checks) around the EC2 and VPC environment would push the product closer to a full‑stack cloud‑security tool, rather than a dedicated antimalware layer. Customers already using GravityZone and XDR would likely appreciate seeing misconfigurations, risky IAM patterns, or open‑to‑the‑Internet instances flagged alongside the traditional malware‑detection view.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product's initial setup was very straightforward."
"I like that it's stable and easy to access."
"I would absolutely recommend this solution to others."
"What I found most valuable in 360 Safeguard is its VPN feature. I support remote sites, so I use a VPN."
"The best features of Bitdefender Security for AWS are its EC2 workloads, called elastic compute cloud, which provide a solution from a single console to manage policy, deployment, and visibility across all platforms and across all AWS, so it was easy that way and it was good."
"Previously, I was using in-house AWS tools, including AWS GuardRails and security groups, as well as other basic tools like Splunk and Microsoft Sentinel, but those were not adequate, which is why I switched to Bitdefender Security for AWS which has provided better ROI through reduced ransomware incidents, lower downtime, less manual malware cleanup, faster incident response, and improved compliance."
"We consider Bitdefender Security for AWS as a leadership vendor for the cybersecurity solution through the useful product, simplify a single pane of glass, and the integration with the principal compliance regulatory requirements such as ISO 27001 and NIS 2 or DORA, among others."
"The protection that it provides is valuable because the biggest problem that people and companies have been seeing in the last two or three years is scams and everything like that."
"Bitdefender Security for AWS has had a positive impact on the organization; it improved our security posture by providing continuous protection for each workload, helping us detect threats early, and reducing the risk of a malware or ransomware incident."
"Bitdefender Security for AWS offers fantastic integration with the AWS inventory, an extremely lightweight agent, and modules that detect behavioral anomalies and provide extremely fast and accurate detections."
"Bitdefender Security for AWS is just an extra added layer of protection and information that I wouldn't have otherwise."
"Bitdefender Security for AWS has positively impacted my organization by saving time and making things easier, and it also improved security."
 

Cons

"The web center in 360 Safeguard could be better, so this is its area for improvement. 360 Safeguard could be more scalable, especially for big businesses."
"It could be more secure and compatible with other software."
"In 360 Safeguard, there is something called the menu or advanced menu support, a process that I find to be a little bit awkward."
"I give it a nine and not a ten because sometimes the updates can really be a hindrance in terms of productivity, which is why I did not give it a ten."
"I would like to add that perhaps Bitdefender Security for AWS could improve the front-end."
"I remember when they first pushed it to the DBM server, my backup server at the time, it caused a lot of issues because they were supposed to exclude all the folders that they were backing up to and had the storage. I got hold of the security group and asked them to uninstall it. We uninstalled it, ran a script, and then it fixed the problem."
"I believe that one of the points that could be improved in Bitdefender Security for AWS is the integration with Fargate and Lambda functions, as we felt a lack of deeper and unified coverage for containers and serverless within the same standard licensing."
"Improvements needed for Bitdefender Security for AWS relate to CNAPP capabilities, as Bitdefender Security for AWS currently only focuses on workload protection."
"Bitdefender Security for AWS could be improved in the Threat Explorer part, as it doesn't detect everything."
"I found the platform easy to use, but there are always areas to improve."
"Truthfully, anytime someone incorporates AI into their company, I immediately find it less trustworthy and reliable and accurate."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"360 Safeguard is low-priced. It only costs $300."
"I bought a license — it's quite cheap. It's definitely cheaper than an American product. It costs approximately $40 a year."
"It was included in the account that we had. We didn't have to pay for it."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Anti-Malware Tools solutions are best for your needs.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Comms Service Provider
13%
Construction Company
8%
University
8%
Outsourcing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business15
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Bitdefender Security for AWS?
My experience with the pricing, implementation costs, and licenses of Bitdefender Security for AWS has been accessible.
What needs improvement with Bitdefender Security for AWS?
I found the platform easy to use, but there are always areas to improve. One thing I would like to see is even more customizable dashboards and reporting, so different teams can quickly focus on th...
What advice do you have for others considering Bitdefender Security for AWS?
I recommend clearly defining security requirements before deployment and taking time to plan policies for AWS integration. Start with a pilot deployment in a test environment. Overall, I had a posi...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
Archdiocese, Northstar, SeSa, W&W Informatik, Yamaha Motor Europe
Find out what your peers are saying about 360 Safeguard vs. Bitdefender Security for AWS and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.
909,725 professionals have used our research since 2012.