No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

1NCE vs Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

1NCE
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
IoT Connectivity (3rd)
Cloud Security Connector fo...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
Internet Security (5th)
 

Mindshare comparison

1NCE and Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. 1NCE is designed for IoT Connectivity and holds a mindshare of 2.9%.
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, on the other hand, focuses on Internet Security, holds 0.8% mindshare.
IoT Connectivity Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
1NCE2.9%
AWS IoT Core26.4%
Azure IoT Hub14.4%
Other56.300000000000004%
IoT Connectivity
Internet Security Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler0.8%
Zscaler Internet Access27.2%
Cisco Umbrella27.0%
Other45.0%
Internet Security
 

Featured Reviews

Pieter Geelen - PeerSpot reviewer
Freelancer at geelen.io
IoT projects have become effortless as I manage long‑life sensor connectivity and tracking
I think the cool part about 1NCE is that they provide SIM cards for ten years, making them relevant for ten years. It is fairly cheap to get a SIM card from them and if you have a need for particular networks, they support the breadth of networks. With IoT sensors, for example, the 2G and 3G are probably more used. NarrowBand-IoT is also available there. When you want to bring a sensor in the field, it is going to have a certain lifetime and you want to add a SIM card to that, and it is very easy to do that with 1NCE. The best features 1NCE offers in my experience are that you get the SIM cards, you have a platform in which you can manage your SIM cards and you have a backend where you can also communicate. What I think is really powerful about 1NCE is that you can just order it online. It is very simple to do, you have it really quickly and it just works out of the box. If you would compare that to other mobile phone or mobile network providers, then this would be a lot of work with contracts and other administrative tasks. Here you do not have that. Another nice feature is that their platform allows for geofencing or geolocation, so you can identify where what towers are being used and where your sensor approximately is. This also helps with tracking. They have the capability to manage network access, whether devices can go directly to the internet or have a different approach of accessing those devices. This covers the breadth of needs for bringing IoT and mobile network together. 1NCE has impacted my organization positively because I am a freelancer and I deliver this to customers. Customers very often struggle with getting started with IoT. They have to think about contracts for mobile phone providers or mobile network providers. Because 1NCE has a very simple business model, it is very easy to understand, very easy to budget, and that lowers the threshold for companies that want to start with this.
Vibin Thomas - PeerSpot reviewer
Technical Team Lead - Content Security at Valuepoint Systems
Unified cloud policies have improved zero-trust controls and simplified workload monitoring
A challenge faced during the initial implementation involved routing and application dependency. After routing cloud workload traffic through Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, a few applications started failing because they depended on specific external services that were getting blocked due to strict policies or SSL inspection. To resolve this, traffic was analyzed using Zscaler logs, the exact domains and services being impacted were identified, and a controlled policy exception was created while maintaining overall security. This helped strike the right balance between security and application availability, which is very important in production environments. A key learning from this was that while Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler provides strong security control, proper policy tuning and understanding application behavior is critical for smooth deployment. Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has had a very positive impact, especially in terms of security and operational efficiency. Before implementation, cloud workloads had direct internet access through the NAT gateway, which limited visibility and control over outbound traffic. After adopting Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, all traffic was routed through Zscaler, giving centralized visibility and full policy enforcement. One improvement observed was a significant increase in threat detection. The ability to identify and block suspicious outbound connections that were previously not visible improved the overall security posture. From an operational perspective, troubleshooting became much faster. Instead of checking multiple cloud logs, Zscaler logs could be directly used to analyze traffic behavior, which reduced incident resolution time. The dependency on traditional firewall appliances in cloud environments was reduced, which simplified the architecture and lowered operational overhead. Additionally, for compliance-driven clients in banking, it helped meet audit requirements by providing detailed logs and consistent policy enforcement across both users and workloads. Measurable improvements were observed after implementing Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler. In terms of visibility and threat detection, a 25 to 35 percent increase in identifying suspicious outbound connections was seen that were previously not visible when traffic was going through NAT. From an operational standpoint, troubleshooting time reduced by 45 to 55 percent because Zscaler logs could be directly analyzed instead of checking multiple cloud logs. Dependence on additional security appliances in the cloud was also reduced, which helped lower operational overhead and simplified the architecture. In terms of compliance, better audit readiness was achieved with centralized logging and consistent policy enforcement across workloads and users. While Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is a strong solution, one area that could be improved, especially for teams that are new, is configuring route tables, ensuring proper traffic flow, and avoiding asymmetric routing, which can be challenging, particularly in large or multi-VPC environments. More automated deployment options or guided configurations, especially for AWS or Azure, would simplify the onboarding process. Another area for improvement is better visibility at the cloud-native level, such as tighter integration with cloud logs or more context-aware insight for workload behavior, which would make troubleshooting even faster. Once properly implemented, it works efficiently and provides strong security and visibility. In addition to deployment simplicity, improvements around policy tuning and documentation would add significant value. From a policy perspective, when Zscaler policy is extended to cloud workloads, it sometimes requires careful fine-tuning to avoid impacting application dependency. More predefined templates or workload-specific policy recommendations would help teams implement it faster with fewer disruptions. In terms of documentation, while the existing guides are helpful, more step-by-step real-world deployment examples, especially for multi-VPC or hybrid environments, would make onboarding smoother for teams. Tighter integration guidance with cloud-native tools such as AWS logging or monitoring services would further improve troubleshooting and visibility. From a support standpoint, faster access to best practice recommendations or reference architecture would help teams avoid common misconfigurations during the initial setup.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"1NCE has positively impacted our organization by reducing connectivity costs and simplifying the management of our IoT deployment, making it easier to scale effectively."
"We estimate connectivity costs were reduced by around 20 to 30 percent and centralized device management saved several hours of administrative effort each month."
"Since I use 1NCE for IoT devices, it has significantly changed IoT device management and everything related to it."
"What I really appreciate about 1NCE, and I think they are the only player that really does it like this, is that they provide the SIM card and it just works."
"The platform is simple to use, reliable, and removes much of the complexity of managing IoT connectivity at scale, which has been a significant advantage."
"The impact of Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler on our organization has been very positive as it is a very efficient application that we use for ninety percent of the clients."
"The solution is secure."
"It is very useful ............visibility on the end-user,"
"While we are operating Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler, we have noticed a radical drop in architectural complexity, along with a massive cloud infrastructure cost reduction and accelerated incident response times."
"Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has positively impacted my organization, because now whenever we log into our VDI, we can access our apps directly without connecting to a separate VPN, saving approximately five to ten minutes each time and significantly improving our productivity and screen time."
"Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has had a very positive impact, especially in terms of security and operational efficiency."
"Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has positively impacted our organization by helping us in our cloud environment to connect our resources to Zscaler, ensuring that security policies are consistent with zero-trust access and increasing reliability by 28%."
"Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler has had a positive impact by making the testing and validation process more efficient."
 

Cons

"While the overall experience with 1NCE has been positive, there are a few areas where it could improve."
"1NCE has a 500 MB lifetime cap, which is tight for some IoT devices that use more data."
"1NCE could be improved with more advanced analytics and reporting features for monitoring device performance and connectivity trends."
"One thing we can improve regarding Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is that every time I log into my laptop, it asks me to sign in to Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler again and again."
"If there are any issues at the network level, such as users working from home, then it is very hard to catch up with them and resolve issues on the end-user machine."
"I believe they could improve by reducing the response time for high-priority cases and providing more proactive updates during long investigations."
"Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler does almost everything, but sometimes it can be a pain if we are using the ZCC agent because the logs that we have to get on the end users are really difficult to gather."
"Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler can be improved by offering seamless OS upgrades while moving beyond reprovisioning, along with high-throughput burst performance and horizontal scaling."
"The connectivity could be faster."
"The best value comes when you already use the Zscaler ecosystem, so if you have anything other than the Zscaler ecosystem, it may not work optimally."
"While Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is a strong solution, one area that could be improved, especially for teams that are new, is configuring route tables, ensuring proper traffic flow, and avoiding asymmetric routing, which can be challenging, particularly in large or multi-VPC environments."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IoT Connectivity solutions are best for your needs.
910,437 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Outsourcing Company
27%
Construction Company
21%
Educational Organization
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Construction Company
22%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Insurance Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business7
Midsize Enterprise4
Large Enterprise8
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise1
Large Enterprise6
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with 1NCE?
While the overall experience with 1NCE has been positive, there are a few areas where it could improve. The main area for improvement would be advanced analytics and reporting. Additional monitorin...
What is your primary use case for 1NCE?
1NCE is used to manage IoT connectivity for distributed devices across multiple locations. It provides reliable cellular connectivity for remote monitoring, device management, and data transmission...
What advice do you have for others considering 1NCE?
The ease of integration and responsive support team should be highlighted. The platform is simple to use, reliable, and removes much of the complexity of managing IoT connectivity at scale, which h...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler reveals that the pricing can be complex since it is rarely sold at a stand-alone price. Instead, the l...
What needs improvement with Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?
Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler agents have some issues while applying the policies, and the main thing is when we try to apply policies over the ZCC agent, it takes a couple of minutes. I thi...
What is your primary use case for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler?
The main use case for Cloud Security Connector for Zscaler is monitoring the cloud traffic that we do, and we can connect cloud security applications with the AWS and GCP infrastructure so that we ...
 

Overview