11:11 Cloud Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery comparison

11:11 Systems and Amazon Web Services (AWS) are both solutions in the Cloud Backup category. 11:11 Systems is ranked #53, while Amazon Web Services (AWS) is ranked #16 with an average rating of 7.8. 11:11 Systems holds a 0.6% mindshare in CB, compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS)’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 66% of 11:11 Systems users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Amazon Web Services (AWS) users who would recommend it.

11:11 Cloud Backup

Read 3 11:11 Cloud Backup reviews

628 Views
597 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Read 20 AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery reviews

2,403 Views
1,298 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

11:11 Cloud Backup

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between 11:11 Cloud Backup and AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Cloud Backup solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed 11:11 Cloud Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

11:11 Cloud Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,114 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

11:11 Cloud Backup

Ranking in Cloud Backup

53rd

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Ranking in Cloud Backup

16th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (20th), Disaster Recovery (DR) Software (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Cloud Backup category, the mindshare of 11:11 Cloud Backup is 0.6%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is 1.3%, up from 1.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Backup Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery	1.3%
11:11 Cloud Backup	0.6%
Other	98.1%

Cloud Backup

Featured Reviews

Brian Lippold

Network Administrator at BROCKPORT CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT

Good deduplication, easy to scale, and has good support

iland Secure Cloud Backup is very scalable. If you ask them for more space, they provide you with the pricing, and they make the adjustments on their end. We just recently went from 10 TB to 15 TB and they also do a great job of deduplication, because we were only using 10 TB, even though our SAN is 20TB, we were using 11 TB of it and we have some physical servers that were we are backing up.

Read full review

reviewer2774796

Data Governance System Specialist at a energy/utilities company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Disaster recovery has strengthened critical grid operations and maintains regulatory compliance

A couple of things where AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery could improve are the granular testing of OT workloads. It would be helpful to have fully isolated test recoveries for our OT data, such as SCADA or pole telemetry, without impacting replication, to help validate disaster recovery readiness more frequently. Additionally, advanced reporting and analytics would be beneficial. If the tool could provide more built-in dashboards to show replication lag trends, failover readiness, or system dependencies, it would save time and improve transparency for both field teams and regulatory reporting. In terms of integration, tighter integration with our asset management systems and GIS databases would streamline automated recovery of linked OT systems and data relationships, making failover more efficient. There should also be more fine-grained alerts for replication lag or orchestration failures, with customizable thresholds for different types of workloads to improve proactive incident response. My advice would be to start with a clear disaster recovery strategy. Identify which IT and OT systems are critical, calculate the recovery time objective, and which assets need replication first. Keep latency-sensitive or legacy OT systems on-premises while replicating core IT workloads to AWS for fast, reliable failover. It is essential to keep testing failovers regularly, as it builds confidence and uncovers gaps that help ensure smooth operation during real incidents. Actively monitor costs by paying attention to replication storage and compute usage since AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is pay-as-you-go, which allows us to save thousands of dollars annually. Connecting disaster recovery events with field operations, SCADA systems, and asset management dashboards streamlines operational responses. The AWS team is great, and engaging with their support and architects, along with their documentation and best practices, is very helpful.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The service itself wasn't bad."

"iland is excellent as far as the interface."

"They have just implemented a Backup and Restore portal that we think is very good."

"The most valuable aspect of CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is its instant block replication feature. This allows us to perform live block verification and eliminates the need to concern ourselves with recovery point objectives. This capability is particularly advantageous for critical workloads."

"What I like about ECR AWS is that it is a fully managed service, so I don't need to manage the underlying infrastructure or worry about scalability in AWS concerning building, maintenance, security, and high availability."

"Technical support has been very good. They usually respond quickly to our requests."

"AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery has allowed us to maintain critical operations during high-impact natural disasters, protecting both our customers and our assets while demonstrating measurable improvements in our response time and regulatory compliance."

"Since it is a managed service, I reduce my time to manage infrastructure and applications."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution."

"The setup is pretty straightforward."

"For regular backup and restore solutions, this product is fine."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pros

Cons

"The vendor needs to changes billing to work like every other business and stop charging people if they stop using your service."

"They don't support a more current version of VMware."

"I would like to see a better method of backing up Exchange in the cloud."

"The failback could be improved. It should be more intuitive."

"Sometimes a server will get a bit behind. "

"There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost."

"The cost of AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery is seen as expensive."

"The bandwidth is a constant upload communication to the AWS DR environment, so if you do not have the proper bandwidth, it will definitely eat up your internet line."

"I would like to see better support for creating and working with archives."

"In its current state, ECL integrates with CloudWatch for basic logging and monitoring, yet improvements could include more detailed logs for specific actions, like when I perform actions such as push or pull."

"We believe that customer support for AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery needs to be improved because although we do raise tickets, the response can take some time."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Billing practices for iLand are monthly. If you are a business and would like a yearly rate, good luck."

"The licensing costs are approximately $12,000 annually."

"iland is affordable."

"CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is charging clients $20 to do the DR backups. It is an expensive solution."

"I feel the product's pricing is a good value. Licensing is pretty straightforward."

"We were happy with the pricing that they gave us."

"It has saved us money from having to buy hardware for disaster recovery."

"The pricing is better now that they had come out with the Tier 2 which replicates a little less often. In comparison to what I would have been spending with any other type of solution, the pricing is fair."

"On a scale from one to ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the solution's pricing an eight out of ten."

"Where the price adds up, there are CloudEndure licenses, then there is the AWS environment, and finally, there is the AWS storage, so cumulatively, it adds up."

"They license us on a per machine basis. We have a set number of machines, which we have licensed."

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Backup solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Educational Organization

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

Government

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	5
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	11

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery is a fairly stable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

The pricing has been fine, and regarding the setup cost as well, it is quite fine. There is definitely a scope of improvement, and for year-end licensing, they should definitely improve the cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with CloudEndure Disaster Recovery?

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery can be improved through regular drills to ensure that all resources are properly prepared for disasters with scheduled drills. This includes testing and understanding ...

See all answers

Comparisons

Veeam Data Platform vs 11:11 Cloud Backup

Compared 51% of the time

Veeam Data Cloud for Microsoft 365 vs 11:11 Cloud Backup

Compared 49% of the time

More 11:11 Cloud Backup Competitors

Azure Site Recovery vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 17% of the time

AWS Backup vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 13% of the time

HPE Zerto Software vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 11% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Data Guard vs AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Compared 7% of the time

More AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cloud Backup

January 2026

Download 11:11 Cloud Backup product report

Buyer's Guide

AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

January 2026

Download AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery product report

Also Known As

iland Secure Cloud Backup

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery

Overview

11:11 Cloud Backup is designed for businesses needing reliable data protection and secure storage. It offers scalable and efficient cloud backup solutions, tailored to meet diverse business needs.

11:11 Cloud Backup ensures data protection with a robust and flexible system. It stands out with its capability to handle large-scale data operations effectively, providing peace of mind for data security. Users benefit from easy data restoration, ensuring minimal downtime during data loss scenarios. The intuitive management interface promotes efficient data oversight, enhancing the data backup experience. As user demands grow, 11:11 Cloud Backup allows scalable upgrades for enduring data requirements. Users can improve their backup routines with strong encryption methods, safeguarding data integrity.

What are the essential features of 11:11 Cloud Backup?

Scalability: Easily adjust resources to meet growing data needs.
Data Restoration: Quick recovery options minimize downtime.
Security: Advanced encryption ensures data safety.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Cost Efficiency: Evaluate cost-effective data management and storage.
Reliability: Assess consistent performance and uptime.
Flexibility: Look for adaptability to changing data storage needs.

11:11 Cloud Backup implementation varies across industries, offering tailored data protection solutions. In finance sectors, it supports compliance through secure data retention. Healthcare organizations benefit from rapid data access and recovery. Retail businesses rely on its robust encryption to protect customer information.

11:11 Systems

CloudEndure Disaster Recovery enables real-time replication and rapid recovery to enhance organizational resilience. Key features include block-level data replication, ease of use, cost-effectiveness, and automated recovery orchestration. Users benefit from increased efficiency, improved workflows, and enhanced data management, significantly improving organizational performance and business continuity.

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Sample Customers

bluestone, rentokil, BBA Aviation, gbe converge, navigator gas, omninet

Agio, Cloud Nation, Limelight Networks

Buyer's Guide

11:11 Cloud Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

December 2025

Free Report: 11:11 Cloud Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery

Find out what your peers are saying about 11:11 Cloud Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,114 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our 11:11 Cloud Backup vs. AWS Elastic Disaster Recovery report.

See our list of best Cloud Backup vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Backup reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.