CA eHealth [EOL] was previously known as CA eHealth Performance Manager.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Technical Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | I use this stable reporting solution for its valuable, easy-to-use canned reports. I dislike the bad customer service, high cost, and poor index shifting, which needs improvement. Overall, I rate it an eight. |
| Network Manager at a energy/utilities company with 10,001+ employees | 3.0 | I use this stable tool for centralized network infrastructure monitoring, with good customer service. I'm upgrading for new features, but I'd like an overall view of applications and infrastructure to consolidate tools and reduce complexity. |
| Manager of Network Monitoring and Remote Access at Jacobs | 4.0 | I appreciate its rock-solid stability and extensive data for long-term trend reporting, deploying easily. However, its reporting capabilities are limited and simplistic, requiring another product for custom reports, and AD authentication is complicated. |
| Senior Network Support Analyst with 1,001-5,000 employees | I find this solution excellent for capacity planning and proactive network monitoring. However, I am frustrated by its slow performance, outdated Java GUI, and challenging alert configuration, despite good customer support. | |
| Senior Manager of Network at a tech company with 1,001-5,000 employees | No summary available |
![CA eHealth [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_100/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT)
![NetMaster Network Intelligence vs CA eHealth [EOL] Logo](https://images.peerspot.com/image/upload/c_scale,dpr_3.0,f_auto,q_100,w_30/PNT6PqoKPXw9AHMYdimfVbN9.jpg?_a=BACAGSGT){kind=small}