We performed a comparison between CA eHealth [EOL] and HPE OneView based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."The most valuable feature of this solution is the fact that it sends me canned reports. It's easy to use and easy to update."
"By being able to deploy servers very quickly and rapidly, we can respond to any business requirement needed."
"It monitors all our servers, and if there is any problem it straight away sends us an alert. If It's a faulty component, we can see it from there. It sends an alert."
"Broad range of tools to create executive and operations dashboards."
"I don't have to use CD-ROMs or anything like that to provision the servers."
"OneView provides a single console, which is manageable without physical access."
"Easy to see if all my servers are on correct firmware levels, with SPP packaging."
"If you have a lot of devices, like we do, then you have to have one single pane of view, otherwise we lose too much time. So, we needed this type of solution."
"The initial setup is easy."
"I would like to see improved index shifting."
"The speed and performance of the solution are areas where the product lacks and needs improvement."
"Sometimes the interface can be a little confusing, sometimes the error messages can be very cryptic, as far as what's actually going on."
"I had some minor difficulties with upgrading, but the solution still works fine."
"We ran into a couple of issues here and there with the baselines for the firmware and not having enough space on the appliance itself to be able to have more than two baselines."
"Does not allow for switch configuration other than through OneView."
"We've had issues, for example, with RAM."
"The main problem that we run into, as far as stability goes, is when something loses its profile. Sometimes it requires jumping through a number of "hoops" to really get it back."
"It needs more reporting capabilities."
Earn 20 points
CA eHealth [EOL] doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in IT Infrastructure Monitoring while HPE OneView is ranked 17th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 80 reviews. CA eHealth [EOL] is rated 7.4, while HPE OneView is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of CA eHealth [EOL] writes "It has a lot of data on a stable platform. It only has a few canned out-of-the-box reports". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE OneView writes "Provides firmware compliance and the ability to connect to iPO". CA eHealth [EOL] is most compared with NetMaster Network Intelligence, whereas HPE OneView is most compared with Cisco Intersight, Dell CloudIQ, Zabbix, Lenovo XClarity Orchestrator and ServiceNow IT Operations Management.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
