OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web offers integration with HPE and non-HPE tools, real device testing, and device management. It supports real-time analytics and multi-platform testing, ensuring traceability and flexibility with decentralized devices.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web | 3.5% |
| Tricentis Tosca | 33.1% |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 21.1% |
| Other | 42.3% |
| Type | Title | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Category | Mobile App Testing Tools | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Product | Reviews, tips, and advice from real users | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs Tricentis Tosca | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs OpenText Functional Testing | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Comparison | OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web vs UiPath Test Cloud | Sep 14, 2025 | Download |
| Title | Rating | Mindshare | Recommending | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tricentis Tosca | 4.1 | 33.1% | 96% | 112 interviewsAdd to research |
| OpenText Functional Testing | 4.0 | 21.1% | 87% | 97 interviewsAdd to research |
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web has a dedicated department for customer service and technical support. Users reported helpful interactions with R&D for issue resolution. Some noted prompt and responsive service, especially with enterprise agreements. However, the technical support is not seen as outstanding by all, with challenges in documentation accessibility. Despite some delays in delivering enhancements, many found support services satisfactory and supportive when resolving technical issues.
Installation is often complex due to Linux support and integration requirements. Some users find setup straightforward, especially with R&D's help or by understanding the tool's architecture. Integrating with other tools adds complexity, needing fine-tuning, ports, and certificates. Initial configuration poses challenges, taking one to two months with several resources. Setup difficulty varies, but simplicity improves with familiarity. Some rate it seven out of ten, finding it neither too easy nor too complex.
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 12 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 56 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 21 |
| Large Enterprise | 75 |
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web is designed to enhance testing efficiency for mobile and desktop applications by allowing ease of integration with different testing environments. It features real-time analytics, supports automated device management, and provides the flexibility of decentralized testing on real devices. With a focus on robust traceability, it stands out as a comprehensive choice for optimizing software development life cycles, especially notable for its ability to support multiple devices simultaneously and strategic scaling through network virtualization and AWS device farm.
What are the key features of OpenText Functional Testing Lab?Financial services companies utilize OpenText Functional Testing Lab for optimizing mobile solutions and applications, ensuring a streamlined integration into their Application Lifecycle Management and Unified Functional Testing processes. It aids in functional and performance testing, adapting to both on-premises and cloud deployments to suit industry-specific demands.
OpenText Functional Testing Lab for Mobile and Web was previously known as Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center.
Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Senior Director at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees | 3.5 | I've found OpenText Functional Testing Lab versatile and stable, working well across platforms like SAP and Salesforce, with good CI/CD integration. However, low-code features and stronger SAP partnerships would enhance its competitiveness in an evolving market. |
| Technical director at Dugson.Consulting | 4.5 | I focus on helping customers optimize their software development lifecycle with OpenText UFT Digital Lab. Key features include automation and traceability across platforms like Jira and Azure DevOps. Improvements are needed in ensuring effective product usage and adoption of suitable frameworks. |
| Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees | 4.0 | I use OpenText UFT Digital Lab for automating mobile solutions in financial services. Its flexibility in device management is valuable, though interactions with OpenText support can be challenging. Overall, it enables efficient software testing across multiple platforms. |
| Software Engineer at KPIT Technologies | 4.0 | I use OpenText UFT Digital Lab to test desktop applications. It offers valuable decision-making capabilities that contribute to its growth. However, it needs improvement in object detection to address performance issues. We chose it over SmartBear TestComplete and Tricentis Tosca. |
| Solutions Architect at MTN | 4.0 | I find OpenText UFT Digital Lab easy to use, though its pricing could be improved with a pay-per-use subscription model. I utilize Amazon Web Services for deployment. Overall, I appreciate its usability, but better pricing options would enhance value. |
| Sales Leader at Better Now | 4.0 | I find OpenText UFT Digital Lab easy to use, particularly for orchestrating mobile testing and automation. However, it needs improvement in scaling devices and integrating cloud solutions like AWS for enhanced functionality. |
| Responsible for Test Management at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees | 4.0 | No summary available |
| Manager at a consultancy with 10,001+ employees | 4.5 | No summary available |
