No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Logo

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Reviews

Vendor: IBM
3.5 out of 5
Leave a review

What is IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog?

Information governance is a next-gen comprehensive process of administering, enhancing, and collating information to strengthen an organization’s trust and belief that its decision and business processes are the best for the organization’s overall health and continued progress. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is an intuitive, progressive web-based tool that empowers users to discover, comprehend, and dissect information. Users are able to design, administer, and collaborate to track data pipelines, execute protocols and procedures, and share common business languages.

Integrate the solution with IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog to increase on-premises Information Governance Catalog efficiency in the cloud and improve the benefit of current gathered data sets. This value-added governance catalog enables users to place gathered metadata where experienced users, analytics, and data communities have seamless protected access to the appropriate resources, based on need, while still maintaining the organization's governance standards.

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog delivers a secure starting point for organizations to better comprehend and govern their information across the entire network, and continually delivers secure, well-defined, and governed data.

Get the IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog, Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC), Collibra Platform and more!
IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is the #9 ranked solution in top Metadata Management solutions. PeerSpot users give IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog an average rating of 7.0 out of 10. IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is most commonly compared to Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC): IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC). IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 64% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 34% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog
March 2026
Get the report
Helped 885,311 peers since 2012

Featured IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog reviews

Read more reviews

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog in the Metadata Management category stands at 3.0%, down from 3.2% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Metadata Management Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog3.0%
Collibra Platform18.7%
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)14.6%
Other63.7%
Metadata Management

PeerResearch reports based on IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryMetadata ManagementMar 30, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonIBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs Collibra PlatformMar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonIBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)Mar 30, 2026Download
ComparisonIBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog vs Alation Data CatalogMar 30, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)4.014.6%92%214 interviewsAdd to research
Collibra Platform3.918.7%96%74 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Mar 27, 2026

Valuable Features

  • "It helped us streamline and organize our data."
  • "IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is a stable product."
  • "The solution allows us to leverage a concept called Open IGC to create custom assets and data lineages that are not technologies typically supported by IBM via connectors."

Room for Improvement

  • "Sometimes, if the product is new, getting support is difficult and the team was facing some challenges."
  • "The simplicity of usage could improve, perhaps the simplicity of use for end users, not for system integrators, but for the end users."
  • "A few years ago, I would have rated the solution an eight or nine. With competition in the market and other products available, IBM needs to focus on fixing existing issues and adding more customizable features that provide the end user with a better product."

Pricing

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is perceived as expensive by users, with licensing costs influenced by the number of users or records. Calculated based on processing volumes, it's purchased as a complete tool within the InfoSphere Information Server, not separately. Yearly licensing is customer-managed, with some reports indicating potential expenses around three hundred thousand pounds. Users find the pricing at the higher end, often feeling IBM is contractually challenging.
  • "IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is expensive."
  • "Licensing fees are paid on a yearly basis."
  • "Licensing for IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog is per user."

Service and Support

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog customer service is noted for being helpful and responsive once users gain contact access, though initial response times can be slow. Responses vary depending on the severity of issues. Users find support inconsistent, with some issues resolved promptly and others lingering. The support quality ratings are mixed, with some citing high attrition and a need for better training. Communication in Portuguese is available.

Stability

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog has mixed perceptions in terms of stability. Some note improvement over time, considering it very stable now, while others highlight performance-related concerns as a heavy tool compared to lighter alternatives like Collibra or Alation. Although IBM provides assistance, necessary configurations must be followed. A few years back, it was ranked very stable, but the market's competitive nature suggests room for enhancement to maintain leadership in the data governance space.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business2
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise5
By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise11
Large Enterprise39
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
34%
Manufacturing Company
10%
University
7%
Legal Firm
5%
Transportation Company
5%
Educational Organization
5%
Healthcare Company
5%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Government
3%
Marketing Services Firm
3%
Insurance Company
2%
Wellness & Fitness Company
2%
Non Profit
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
2%
Renewables & Environment Company
2%
Retailer
2%
Computer Software Company
2%
Engineering Company
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
2%
Logistics Company
2%

Compare IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Benefits

  • Manage catalog metadata: Run data workflows to prove trusted information, support compliance and governance standards, resolve duplicate assets, map databases to database aliases, and automate the authentication of data sources to improve overall project deployment. Additionally, users will discover how data moves across the network and will be able to identify how and where data was sourced and how it is being consumed. This will promote a greater assurance and belief that the data is continually secure and safe.

  • Improved people and process management: The solution helps to definitively clarify roles and responsibilities of all team participants. Users can easily design, edit, and publish governance protocols, accept new or audited information governance rules, and/or move the rule to Draft status. Users will also obtain notice (via email) of any governance issues that appear in their glossary or information assets.

  • Boost current metadata: This can be achieved by using descriptions and relationships, group related labels, stewards, assets, and custom attributes to all other related assets. Develop protracted data sources to add metadata to the catalog that may not be able to be added automatically or that are not able to be imported easily from outside third-party applications. The solution will also help users have a greater understanding of all their data assets - unstructured, semi-structured, and structured.

  • Discover assets in the catalog: Users can easily initiate either a simple or advanced search or even begin very intensive deep queries. An intuitive GUI is available to trace the history of all changes, probe stewards, information assets, glossary assets, and all other catalog content.
  • Seamless cloud integration: IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog facilitates a smooth adjustment to the cloud. This makes it no longer necessary to employ an on-premise ecosystem. This move will also result in significantly reduced resource usage and help save on overall administrative costs for the organization.

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog was previously known as IBM Information Governance Catalog.

IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog customers

Rabobank, QuadReal Property Group, Jakarta Smart City

Related questions

  • 70
Which data catalog can provide support for BI data sources such as SAP BO and Tableau?
  • 27
When evaluating Metadata Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 41
Which would you choose, Informatica Test Data Management (TDM) or Collibra Catalog for data subset validation?
  • 23
Which Metadata Management tool do your prefer?
  • 42
What is the difference between Data Mesh and Data Fabric?
  • 49
Why is Metadata Management important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Metadata Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Logo
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC) vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog
Collibra Platform vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Logo
Collibra Platform vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog
Alation Data Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Logo
Alation Data Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog
IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Logo
IBM InfoSphere Information Server vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog
erwin Data Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Logo
erwin Data Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog
IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Logo
IBM Watson Knowledge Catalog vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog
erwin Data Literacy vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Logo
erwin Data Literacy vs IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog
See all alternatives
 
IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Data Architect at a insurance company with 10,001+ employees3.0I find IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog connects well with various sources, but it's complex, expensive, and demands extensive coding. Licensing is inflexible, and support is poor. We're now evaluating alternatives due to these limitations.
Data Engineering Manager (Big Data & Analytics) at NCR Corporation4.5We use this easy-to-use solution for data cataloging and governance. It streamlined our data, improving reporting and dashboarding, and is very scalable. Initial support was challenging, but it's now helpful. I rate it 9/10.
Partner at Sysvision3.5I use IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog to integrate and govern our information. I find creating special rules in Portuguese valuable. However, scalability and pricing need improvement. The ability to run the solution from different servers would enhance it.
Senior Client Director at Alkemy digital_enabler4.0I use IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog for governance, valuing its graphic flows and lineage. While stable and scalable, end-user simplicity needs improvement. I recommend this straightforward solution, rating it 8/10.
Member Of Technical Staff at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees3.0I use this solution for data governance, appreciating its Open IGC for custom assets. However, I've experienced performance issues with scaling and find its UI customization lacking compared to competitors. IBM needs to improve to stay competitive.
Teamlead at Tata consultancy services4.0I find IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog good for data governance, appreciating its ease of use and automation. However, its lack of connectors and stability issues are primary drawbacks.
Technical Analyst DataWarehouse at ALD Automotive Belgium4.0I find IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog valuable for data lineage and governance, despite its average query tool and reporting. It's stable and scalable, but customer support needs quicker responses and better training. I rate it 8/10.
Lead Architect at Radial Inc4.0I value IBM IGC for its roles and multi-source integration, trusting the brand. However, asset management is complex, it's a heavy tool with performance issues, and support is slow. Initial setup is also complex.