No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.
CAST Highlight Logo

CAST Highlight Reviews

Vendor: CAST
3.9 out of 5

What is CAST Highlight?

Featured CAST Highlight reviews

CAST Highlight mindshare

As of March 2026, the mindshare of CAST Highlight in the Software Composition Analysis (SCA) category stands at 1.2%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
CAST Highlight1.2%
Black Duck SCA11.7%
Snyk10.5%
Other76.6%
Software Composition Analysis (SCA)

PeerResearch reports based on CAST Highlight reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategorySoftware Composition Analysis (SCA)Mar 31, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMar 31, 2026Download
ComparisonCAST Highlight vs SnykMar 31, 2026Download
ComparisonCAST Highlight vs Black Duck SCAMar 31, 2026Download
ComparisonCAST Highlight vs VeracodeMar 31, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Snyk4.110.5%100%51 interviewsAdd to research
GitLab4.23.7%97%91 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
20%
Computer Software Company
9%
Government
8%
Outsourcing Company
7%
Educational Organization
5%
Manufacturing Company
5%
University
5%
Insurance Company
5%
Healthcare Company
4%
Media Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Retailer
3%
Hospitality Company
2%
Construction Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Transportation Company
2%
Performing Arts
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Engineering Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%

Compare CAST Highlight with alternative products

Learn more about CAST Highlight

CAST Highlight customers

Related questions

 
CAST Highlight Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Technical Associate Manager at Accenture3.0I use CAST Highlight for cloud migration and open source safety, finding its identification of code blockers and boosters valuable. However, improvements are needed in platform-specific blockers and support responsiveness due to challenges in sharing source code.
Owner at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees4.5I have used CAST Highlight alongside application management and cloud readiness, finding its quick scanning and environment quality assessment valuable. While improvements could enhance it, it saves time compared to other tools covering up to 70% of its functions.
Chief Architect at Peristent Systems4.5I use CAST Highlight for cloud readiness assessment, valuing its multi-language support. However, I find it costly and wish it integrated AIP's dashboards to avoid using two separate products, despite its stability.
Consultant/Software Engineer at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees4.0<p>I use CAST Highlight for M&amp;A, remotely assessing codebases for risks, which automates insights. Its key differentiator is not needing code access. I desire more granular language-specific insights and better technical support, despite occasional bugs and its profitability.</p>
Direction Digital Workplace & Socles at a insurance company with 51-200 employees3.5I value CAST Highlight's simple interface for quality proof. Although expensive and initially challenging to set up, it's now stable with good support. I desire deeper analysis features. Overall, I rate it 7/10.
Senior Consultant at a consultancy with 51-200 employees4.0I use CAST Highlight to measure software decline and perform automatic function point measurement. Its most valuable features are automation and speed. While we have seen a return on investment, configuration and customization need improvement.
Advisor Solution Architect at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees3.5I used CAST Highlight for a client project, appreciating its easy-to-use dashboard and Azure DevOps integration. However, its high abstraction compared to Veracode and lack of developer support were drawbacks. Veracode remains my preferred choice.