Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
AWS CodeCommit Logo

AWS CodeCommit Reviews

Vendor: Amazon Web Services (AWS)
4.0 out of 5
Start review

What is AWS CodeCommit?

AWS CodeCommit is a fully-managed source control service that hosts secure Git-based repositories. It makes it easy for teams to collaborate on code in a secure and highly scalable ecosystem. CodeCommit eliminates the need to operate your own source control system or worry about scaling its infrastructure. You can use CodeCommit to securely store anything from source code to binaries, and it works seamlessly with your existing Git tools.

Get the AWS CodeCommit Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about AWS CodeCommit, Bitbucket, Bitbucket Server and more!
AWS CodeCommit is the #5 ranked solution in top Version Control solutions. PeerSpot users give AWS CodeCommit an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. AWS CodeCommit is most commonly compared to Bitbucket: AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket. AWS CodeCommit is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 61% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a financial services firm, accounting for 16% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
AWS CodeCommit
June 2025
Get the report
Helped 855,164 peers since 2012

Featured AWS CodeCommit reviews

Read more reviews

AWS CodeCommit mindshare

As of June 2025, the mindshare of AWS CodeCommit in the Version Control category stands at 5.9%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Version Control

PeerResearch reports based on AWS CodeCommit reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryVersion ControlJun 8, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJun 8, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS CodeCommit vs BitbucketJun 8, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket ServerJun 8, 2025Download
ComparisonAWS CodeCommit vs GitHubJun 8, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Bitbucket4.232.8%98%49 interviewsAdd to research
Bitbucket Server4.124.9%85%26 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

AWS CodeCommit offers ease of use, seamless AWS integration, no complex authentication, and cost-effectiveness. It features code versioning, approval options, and user-friendly interface. It's scalable with private repositories, enhanced security, and IAM-based access control. The integration with CodePipeline, CodeBuild, and CodeDeploy simplifies workflow. Built-in encryption, triggers, and Git support add value. Its deployment in environments like Huntington and Walgreens enables secure code management and efficient pipeline configurations using native AWS tools.
  • "What I find best about AWS CodeCommit is its seamless integration with the AWS ecosystem."
  • "The customer service is pretty good."
  • "The customer service is pretty good."

Room for Improvement

AWS CodeCommit's lack of features like code reviewers, repository forking, and debugging hinders its functionality. Its user interface and Git integration are basic compared to Bitbucket, GitHub, and GitLab. Migration processes and file size limits are inconvenient. Insight Analytics could benefit from a sophisticated dashboard. Integration with third-party tools, such as Jira and Jenkins, is inadequate. A better CI/CD visualization and improved search functionality could enhance user experience. Pricing transparency is needed, along with beginner tutorials.
  • "The Git interfaces in AWS CodeCommit definitely need work. When we migrated our payment processing system at Huntington, we found the web UI to be basic compared to GitHub and GitLab."
  • "Not really that much stands out. I am using CodeCommit since my customer asked me to use it. It is just an appliance, and GitHub and GitLab can do a better job."
  • "When I compare code, AWS has a cap on the file size, and that size is pretty small compared to what GitHub and GitLab provide."

ROI

Users mentioned that AWS CodeCommit significantly improved their project collaboration and management by providing a reliable and scalable repository hosting service. Many users experienced a noticeable reduction in downtime and latency, resulting in enhanced productivity. The ability to integrate seamlessly with other AWS services optimized their workflow while lowering costs associated with self-hosted solutions. Some noted that the secure environment provided by AWS CodeCommit boosted their confidence in code integrity and data safety.

Pricing

AWS CodeCommit is often viewed as competitively priced, though some find it costly compared to alternatives like Azure. Its straightforward pricing model charges based on users and storage, with the first five active users free and $1 per additional user monthly. Some organizations find substantial cost savings since AWS handles management tasks, yet others, especially smaller businesses, have noted increased expenses over time. Enterprise buyers must consider their specific needs and budgets when evaluating AWS CodeCommit.
  • "AWS CodeCommit is competitively priced against all the other competitors."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "As for pricing, you can add the table in detail. You can visit Bitbucket or refer to any other tools. There, you can see what is the difference between your pricing and other prices. You have only mentioned it in a single line. Other tools have been mentioned in a table format, like, how many users, premium, normal accounts, and other things."

Popular Use Cases

AWS CodeCommit is utilized as a code repository for storing data, managing application and microservices code, and creating CI/CD pipelines. Users employ it for Git-related activities, integrating seamlessly with EC2 and S3. It supports automatic change integration with deployment servers and provides branch protection. Many users prefer AWS CodeCommit due to its integration capabilities with IAM rules, facilitating organized repositories by service domain and firing Lambda functions to trigger notifications.

Service and Support

AWS CodeCommit customer service and support are generally rated as excellent. Users report fast responses, efficient assistance, and helpful interactions. AWS provides a separate support module, and the experience may vary according to the support level. Customers find the team responsive and able to handle various issues, from architectural to infrastructure coding levels. Users appreciate the strict adherence to protocols, ensuring no delays in resolving issues.

Deployment

AWS CodeCommit's initial setup mostly ranges from a few minutes to one or two hours. Users with AWS experience find it easier, rating it highly. Compared to Bitbucket and Azure, the setup is easier and quicker. Tutorials enhance the process, though some encounter specific issues, like integration with VS Code. Learning repository integration and file management is necessary. Many find the configuration straightforward and not a significant challenge.

Scalability

AWS CodeCommit impresses users with its scalability, allowing easy adjustments to meet various requirements. Supported by S3, it handles multiple developers without issues and offers competitive pricing compared to alternatives. Users report no bottlenecks or technical problems in terms of scalability and appreciate its unlimited access for deployment priorities. Even with smaller teams, it effectively manages source code, confirming its capacity to scale as needed without requiring additional resources.

Stability

AWS CodeCommit demonstrates considerable stability, with multiple users noting no issues barring some file size limitations and rare latency concerns. Occasional bottlenecks and repository access drops were reported during significant deployments, particularly at Huntington, where latency caused delays in code merges. However, these instances are isolated, and generally, CodeCommit provides a reliable environment with shared security responsibilities. Stability-wise, glitches are minimal due to the self-managed nature by Amazon, ensuring consistent performance.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our AWS CodeCommit Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Computer Software Company
10%
Government
9%
University
6%
Comms Service Provider
6%
Educational Organization
5%
Non Profit
4%
Healthcare Company
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Media Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Logistics Company
2%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Pharma/Biotech Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Retailer
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Legal Firm
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%
Construction Company
1%
Marketing Services Firm
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Transportation Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%

Compare AWS CodeCommit with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about AWS CodeCommit

AWS CodeCommit was previously known as CodeCommit.

AWS CodeCommit customers

Edmunds, Gett, ClicksMob

Related questions

  • 2
When evaluating Version Control, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 1
Why is Version Control important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Version Control

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
Bitbucket vs AWS CodeCommit
Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
Bitbucket Server vs AWS CodeCommit
GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
GitHub vs AWS CodeCommit
Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit Logo
Atlassian SourceTree vs AWS CodeCommit
See all alternatives