Firebird SQL is an open-source, cross-platform relational database management system that offers an enterprise-level database solution. The solution is designed to be highly secure, efficient, and compatible with various platforms and programming languages. Firebird can operate in both embedded and server modes.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Firebird SQL | 21.0% |
| SQLite | 27.4% |
| DuckDB | 12.3% |
| Other | 39.3% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 10 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 3 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 272 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 133 |
| Large Enterprise | 337 |
Firebird is an open-source project with an active community of developers and users. It is released under the Initial Developer's Public License (IDPL) and the InterBase Public License, allowing for free use, modification, and distribution.
The Firebird solution requires minimal configuration and its architecture allows it to efficiently handle databases ranging from a few KB to multiple terabytes. It is available for various operating systems, including Windows, Linux, macOS, and several Unix-like platforms.
What are the key features of Firebird SQL?
As part of being a commonly used open-sourced solution, Firebird boasts a vibrant community of developers and users. The community provides extensive documentation, third-party tools, and active forums for support. Businesses can also opt for professional support services offered by third-party vendors for added assurance.
To summarize, Firebird SQL is a robust, scalable, and cost-effective database solution suitable for a wide range of applications and business sizes. Its comprehensive SQL support, security features, and cross-platform compatibility, combined with the active community support, make it a compelling choice for businesses looking to leverage the power of open-source software without compromising on performance or security.
Elekt Labs, Streamsoft, wobe-systems GmbH, DRB Systems, Moscow City Hospital #31
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Research and Development Project Manager at Sixense Monitoring | 4.0 | We use Firebird for data storage in our sensor-based monitoring software due to its reliability and ease of management. While it handles large databases up to four terabytes, managing them can be challenging. We're also considering MongoDB for future use. |
| Chapter Lead at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees | 3.5 | We use Firebird SQL as an open-source database for customer data, chosen for its similarity to InterBase. However, its performance has declined since version 3, lacking monitoring, just-in-time dumps, and journaling features compared to InterBase. |
| Owner at Intersoftware sas | 4.5 | We use Firebird SQL for ERP and enterprise solutions due to its robustness, though cryptography has room for improvement. While it competes well with Oracle and SQL Server for smaller applications, it's not ideal for millions of users. |
| Retail Solution & BI Manager at a tech services company with 51-200 employees | 4.0 | We are satisfied with Firebird SQL's event capabilities and transactional features for non-critical, continuous solutions. However, it struggles with large databases, requiring indexing and maintenance. Considering alternatives like PostgreSQL and Oracle for new applications as we expand. |
| DevOps · IT at Software Entwicklung | 4.0 | I built applications using Firebird SQL and found it easy to use with minimal issues, saving time and costs. Although stable and resource-efficient, it lacks easy Visual Studio integration. I'm considering MariaDB for better integration options. |
| Strategic Advisor at TradeWindow | 4.5 | My company uses Firebird SQL for its accounting software serving around 300 clients, valuing its reliability, performance, and ease of use. While desirable for large sites, it lacks database sharing. Previously, we used InterBase with no issues. |
| Owner at Ventaja Competitiva | 4.5 | I use Firebird SQL for banking accounting and record management. The solution is reliable with excellent documentation and ongoing improvements, though it lacks a graphical user interface, which would be a beneficial addition for database management tasks. |
| Executive Director at Dynamic Tomorrow | 4.0 | No summary available |
