2018-05-25T19:19:00Z
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
  • 0
  • 1

What needs improvement with CrossBrowserTesting?

Please share with the community what you think needs improvement with CrossBrowserTesting.

What are its weaknesses? What would you like to see changed in a future version?

5
PeerSpot user
5 Answers
CharlesNetshivhera - PeerSpot reviewer
Senior DevOps Engineer at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Real User
Top 5
2021-11-05T16:01:49Z
Nov 5, 2021

We had some issues with the onboarding process and the cloud conductivity could improve.

Search for a product comparison
reviewer1444233 - PeerSpot reviewer
Quality Assurance Specialist at SelectQuote
Real User
2020-10-29T00:23:00Z
Oct 29, 2020

Being able to test on real devices via the virtual connection is wonderful, but it can cause some lag and load time issues while testing. This is one of the few concerns our team has had while trying to accomplish our testing. Going forward, I'm sure improvements can be made to help alleviate some of those concerns. Expansion on automation and quicker testing is something that would greatly benefit our business needs. Smartbear has already implemented some automation on the platform that can be used and improved to fulfill our needs as well as many other users.

reviewer1260174 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager, Web Development at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2020-01-06T15:48:00Z
Jan 6, 2020

This solution would benefit from faster testing and support for more devices.

Real User
2019-02-06T12:22:00Z
Feb 6, 2019

Automated testing could be improved. Test management feature where tests could be scripted. Data-driven testing could be added.

Michael Hutchison - PeerSpot reviewer
Web Specialist at Mayo Clinic
Real User
2018-05-25T19:19:00Z
May 25, 2018

The screenshot tool defaults to a screen layout instead of a full page test. I find it a bit cumbersome that I can't have it run a full screenshot as my default. Every time, I have to select the full screen, then restart its captures, which seems a waste of time and energy. This is, admittedly, a minor complaint.

Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs and others in Functional Testing Tools. Updated: December 2022.
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Related Questions
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Nov 5, 2021
If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering CrossBrowserTesting, what would you say? How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?
2 out of 4 answers
Feb 6, 2019
Agile Support Test script feature Graphical Test Reports Dashboard Widgets
reviewer1260174 - PeerSpot reviewer
Manager, Web Development at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees
Jan 6, 2020
Being able to test against our local development machine is key too. We don't pollute our QA server until we're ready for actual QA and we can find out what's going on much quicker than a check-in/deploy/test/redo cycle that would normally be needed if it weren't for the ability to test locally. This works and it works well and is a great addition to our testing toolbox. Overall, the product does what we need and does it well.
Miriam Tover - PeerSpot reviewer
Service Delivery Manager at PeerSpot (formerly IT Central Station)
Oct 29, 2020
If you were talking to someone whose organization is considering CrossBrowserTesting, what would you say? How would you rate it and why? Any other tips or advice?
2 out of 4 answers
it_user883725 - PeerSpot reviewer
QA Analyst / Software QC at Quartzy, Inc
Jun 5, 2018
Feb 6, 2019
Agile Support Test script feature Graphical Test Reports Dashboard Widgets
Download Free Report
Download our free Functional Testing Tools Report and find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear, BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, and more! Updated: December 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
655,994 professionals have used our research since 2012.