Enterprise Archiect/ IBM & Redhat Business Development at Cancom
Real User
Dec 12, 2023
It's a fast, scalable platform with good support and a friendly community. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. It's a great platform with room for improvement in pricing.
To ensure smooth provisioning, it is crucial to establish your requirements clearly from the outset. This is particularly important for projects where deployments can be easily facilitated through Terraform integration. By being precise about your initial requirements, you can save significant time and avoid delays. In our case, for instance, it took around six to seven months to complete the initial deployment due to unclear infrastructure needs. A substantial amount of time was spent understanding the existing architecture. Therefore, having a clear understanding of what is needed upfront and approaching the solution accordingly can be highly beneficial. I rate Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud an eight out of ten. The solution does exactly what it says it does.
Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten. I like the Red Hat OpenShift platform because of features like the cluster mechanism and scaling. It allows for backup at any time.
UNIX & Storage Administrator at a financial services firm with 201-500 employees
Real User
Oct 23, 2020
At this point, I cannot recommend this to other users because of the experience that we have had. If they were to finalize this product and stop the frequent releases the new would give it another try. Some of the other products are much more expensive. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
I'd warn companies that they need to be of a certain size in order to consider this as a viable solution. It's much more suited to larger organizations. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
PaaS Clouds offer a comprehensive environment that provides developers with the tools to build, test, and deploy applications efficiently in the cloud.PaaS Clouds streamline the development process by offering infrastructure management, middleware, and core services alongside application development tools. This integrated approach enables developers to focus on application functionality rather than infrastructure concerns, which accelerates the software development lifecycle and potentially...
I would rate the solution around eight out of ten. If you focus on security, you have to handle more work yourself and involve more specialists.
If you aim for zero downtime and prioritize reliability and scalability, then having the best user experience is crucial.
It's a fast, scalable platform with good support and a friendly community. Overall, I would rate the solution an eight out of ten. It's a great platform with room for improvement in pricing.
To ensure smooth provisioning, it is crucial to establish your requirements clearly from the outset. This is particularly important for projects where deployments can be easily facilitated through Terraform integration. By being precise about your initial requirements, you can save significant time and avoid delays. In our case, for instance, it took around six to seven months to complete the initial deployment due to unclear infrastructure needs. A substantial amount of time was spent understanding the existing architecture. Therefore, having a clear understanding of what is needed upfront and approaching the solution accordingly can be highly beneficial. I rate Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud an eight out of ten. The solution does exactly what it says it does.
Overall, I would rate the product a nine out of ten. I like the Red Hat OpenShift platform because of features like the cluster mechanism and scaling. It allows for backup at any time.
I rate the solution a nine out of ten.
At this point, I cannot recommend this to other users because of the experience that we have had. If they were to finalize this product and stop the frequent releases the new would give it another try. Some of the other products are much more expensive. I would rate this solution a six out of ten.
I'd warn companies that they need to be of a certain size in order to consider this as a viable solution. It's much more suited to larger organizations. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.