Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
webMethods.io Logo

webMethods.io Reviews

Vendor: IBM
4.0 out of 5
Badge Leader
3,092 followers
Start review

What is webMethods.io?

Featured webMethods.io reviews

webMethods.io mindshare

As of May 2025, the mindshare of webMethods.io in the Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) category stands at 8.6%, down from 9.1% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)

PeerResearch reports based on webMethods.io reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryIntegration Platform as a Service (iPaaS)May 15, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersMay 15, 2025Download
ComparisonwebMethods.io vs Microsoft Azure Logic AppsMay 15, 2025Download
ComparisonwebMethods.io vs MuleSoft Anypoint PlatformMay 15, 2025Download
ComparisonwebMethods.io vs SAP Cloud PlatformMay 15, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Informatica Intelligent Data Management Cloud (IDMC)4.0N/A93%183 interviewsAdd to research
Microsoft Azure API Management3.9N/A91%81 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

ROI

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Retailer
7%
Government
6%
Energy/Utilities Company
6%
Healthcare Company
4%
Insurance Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
3%
University
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Media Company
3%
Transportation Company
2%
Wholesaler/Distributor
2%
Educational Organization
2%
Construction Company
2%
Consumer Goods Company
2%
Legal Firm
2%
Non Profit
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
1%
Performing Arts
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Outsourcing Company
1%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
1%

Compare webMethods.io with alternative products

Learn more about webMethods.io

webMethods.io customers

Related questions

 

webMethods.io reviews

Sort by:
ZD
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Verified user of webMethods.io
Jan 11, 2021
Product version discussed: 10.3
Its single hybrid-integration platform makes it easy to troubleshoot and quickly resolve issues. Upgrades are complex.

Pros

"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."

Cons

"Upgrades are complex. They typically take about five months from start to finish. There are many packages that plug into webMethods Integration Server, which is the central point for a vast majority of the transactions at my organization. Anytime we are upgrading that, there are complexities within each component that we must understand. That makes any upgrade very cumbersome and complicated. That has been my experience at this company. Because there are many different business units that we are touching, there are so many different components that we are touching. The amount of READMEs that you have to go through takes some time."
SG
Information Technology Specialist at PACI
Verified user of webMethods.io
Feb 24, 2025
Transforming civil service automation with powerful and user-friendly tools

Pros

"The product is powerful, straightforward, and easy to use. "

Cons

"Prices should be reduced, ideally by up to 30% for long-term customers like us. "
Find out what your peers are saying about webMethods.io. Updated April 2025
851,371 professionals have used our research since 2012.
RF
Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
Verified user of webMethods.io
Dec 27, 2020
Dramatically decreases our development time for new products, business processes, and integrations with partners

Pros

"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."

Cons

"The solution has big instances when deployed under microservices or in a containerized platform. They need to improve that so that it is competitive with other integration solutions, like Redis and Kafka. Deployments under microservices with those solutions are much more lightweight, in the size of the runtime itself, compared with Software AG."
SJ
Systems Architect at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of webMethods.io
Mar 18, 2021
Product version discussed: 10.5
Helps us design process models that can orchestrate a process from beginning to end, and implement complicated tasks quickly

Pros

"The comprehensiveness and depth of Integration Servers' connectors to packaged apps and custom apps is unlimited. They have a connector for everything. If they don't, you can build it yourself. Or oftentimes, if there is value for other customers as well, you can talk with webMethods about creating a new adapter for you."

Cons

"It would be nice if they had a change management system offering. We built our own deployer application because the one built into webMethods couldn't enforce change management rules. Integration into a change management system, along with the version control system, would be a good offering; it's something that they're lacking."
RF
Enterprise Architect at PT Bank Mandiri (Persero) Tbk.
Verified user of webMethods.io
Jan 7, 2021
Product version discussed: 10.2 or 10.3
We developed several services in the cloud using a sandbox environment for our last hackathon

Pros

"Within the new version, webMethods API Gateway gives us an end-to-end lifecycle from the creation of the API up into the development, deployment, and promotion into production/live. The current end-to-end lifecycle of the API gives us enough authority and governance of the API. We know what are currently live services, what is in the testing stage of development, and what version that has been commissioned. So, the full life cycle itself gives us full authority and governance of the API."

Cons

"With performance, there is room for improvement in regards to if we would like to put another extra layer of security on it, such as SSL. This is affecting their performance quite significantly. They need to improve the process of managing the SSL and other things inside their solutions, so there will not be quite such a significant impact to the performance."
Michele Illiano - PeerSpot user
Head of Division at Innovery
Verified user of webMethods.io
Dec 10, 2022
Can function as an ESB along with the core product, with decent integration of message protocols

Pros

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

Cons

"I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance."
RJ
Integration Lead at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Verified user of webMethods.io
Nov 3, 2022
Product version discussed: 10.3
Good designer and helpful support, but can be buggy

Pros

"From a user perspective, the feature which I like the most about Integration Server is its designer."

Cons

"Support is expensive. "
MohanPrasad - PeerSpot user
Senior Consultant at Brillio
Verified user of webMethods.io
Sep 16, 2024
Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

Pros

"The orchestration aspects of APIs, the integration capabilities, and the logging functionalities were the most critical features of our workflow."

Cons

"The licensing cost is high compared to other options."