We performed a comparison between Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two NoSQL Databases solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The file system is a valuable feature."
"Customer service and support were able to fix whatever the issue was."
"The product provides better data processing features than other tools."
"We had a data warehouse before all the data. We can process a lot more data structures."
"The product as a whole is good."
"The main advantage is the storage is less expensive."
"We experienced many issues when we started working with Hadoop 3.0 in the Cloudera 6.0 version, so there are a lot of things that need to improve. I believe they are working on that."
"The tool can be deployed using different container technologies, which makes it very scalable."
"The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."
"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure."
"The procedure for operations could be simplified."
"There are better solutions out there that have more features than this one."
"It would be useful if Cloudera had more tools like SQL Engines that offer the traditional relational database. We have to do a lot of work preparing the data outside Cloudera before getting it into the platform."
"Currently, we are using many other tools such as Spark and Blade Job to improve the performance."
"Cloudera's support is extremely bad and cannot be relied on."
"The governance aspect of the solution should be improved."
"The competitors provide better functionalities."
"I would like to see an improvement in how the solution helps me to handle the whole cluster."
"Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."
"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved."
More Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is ranked 5th in NoSQL Databases with 47 reviews while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is rated 8.0, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop writes "Good end-to-end security features and we like that it's cloud independent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop is most compared with Amazon EMR, HPE Ezmeral Data Fabric, Apache Spark, MongoDB and SingleStore, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Apache HBase and Oracle NoSQL. See our Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop vs. ScyllaDB report.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.