• Home
  • Oracle NoSQL vs. ScyllaDB

Oracle NoSQL vs ScyllaDB comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Oracle Logo

Oracle NoSQL

Read 7 Oracle NoSQL reviews
1,346 views|1,096 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
ScyllaDB Logo

ScyllaDB

Read 2 ScyllaDB reviews
2,487 views|1,529 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Download the complete report
Buyer's Guide
NoSQL Databases
April 2024
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Oracle NoSQL and ScyllaDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases.
To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: April 2024).
Download the complete report
768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
GLEDSONCOOPER
The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes
Pranv Kumar
A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability.""The tool is easy to learn.""NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go.""The tool performs well."

More Oracle NoSQL Pros →

"It is lightweight, and it requires less infrastructure.""The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively."

More ScyllaDB Pros →

Cons
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options.""The licensing model is bad.""The installation is difficult.""Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."

More Oracle NoSQL Cons →

"The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved.""Data export, along with how we can purchase the data periodically, needs to be improved so that the storage is within control. Then, we could optimize it even better."

More ScyllaDB Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The product is expensive and Oracle could work to lower the licensing cost."

    • More Oracle NoSQL Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive."

    • More ScyllaDB Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    What do you like most about Oracle NoSQL?
    Top Answer:The tool is easy to learn.
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle NoSQL?
    Top Answer:If the use cases change, the cost could be reduced.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What needs improvement with Oracle NoSQL?
    Top Answer:The product must be added to a cloud platform. The link to Oracle must be provided on the cloud platform. It will help people to integrate the tool easily. We need the solution mainly for updating or… more »
    Read all 4 answers   →
    What do you like most about Scylla?
    Top Answer:The performance aspects of Scylla are good, as always... A good point about Scylla is that it can be used extensively.
    Read all 2 answers   →
    What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Scylla?
    Top Answer:I believe that there is a yearly licensing cost and that it's expensive.
    What needs improvement with Scylla?
    Top Answer:It has just been a month or so for me with Scylla. The documentation of Scylla is an area with shortcomings and needs to be improved. Improvement of documentation is needed considering that I work… more »
    Read all 2 answers   →
    Ranking
    8th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    1,346
    Comparisons
    1,096
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    342
    Rating
    8.0
    6th
    out of 18 in NoSQL Databases
    Views
    2,487
    Comparisons
    1,529
    Reviews
    2
    Average Words per Review
    577
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    MongoDB logo
    MongoDB vs. Oracle NoSQL
    Compared 45% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Cassandra vs. Oracle NoSQL
    Compared 29% of the time.
    InfluxDB logo
    InfluxDB vs. Oracle NoSQL
    Compared 7% of the time.
    Couchbase logo
    Couchbase vs. Oracle NoSQL
    Compared 4% of the time.
    More Oracle NoSQL Competitors   →
    MongoDB logo
    MongoDB vs. ScyllaDB
    Compared 39% of the time.
    Cassandra logo
    Cassandra vs. ScyllaDB
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Couchbase logo
    Couchbase vs. ScyllaDB
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Apache HBase logo
    Apache HBase vs. ScyllaDB
    Compared 9% of the time.
    Neo4j Graph Database logo
    Neo4j Graph Database vs. ScyllaDB
    Compared 3% of the time.
    More ScyllaDB Competitors   →
    Learn More
    Oracle
    ScyllaDB
    Overview

    The Oracle NoSQL Database (ONDB) provides network-accessible multiterabyte distributed key/value pair storage with predictable latency. Data is stored in a very flexible key-value format, where the key consists of the combination of a major and minor key (represented as a string) and an associated value (represented as a JSON data format or opaque set of bytes). It offers full Create, Read, Update and Delete (CRUD) operations, with adjustable durability and consistency guarantees. It also provides powerful and flexible transactional model that eases the application development.

    The Oracle NoSQL Database is designed to be a highly available and extremely scalable system, with predictable levels of throughput and latency, while requiring minimal administrative interaction.

    For more information on Oracle NoSQL Database, visit Oracle.com

    ScyllaDB is an open-source, distributed NoSQL wide-column datastore (a highly scalable NoSQL database), known for its compatibility with Apache Cassandra, and for supporting the same protocols as Cassandra (CQL and Thrift) and the same file formats (SSTable). ScyllaDB is designed for high throughput and low latency, making it suitable for data-intensive applications. Its architecture allows it to deliver remarkable performance on a massive scale, utilizing modern multi-core servers to their fullest potential​

    ScyllaDB utilizes a similar architecture, data format, and query language as Apache Cassandra, providing compatibility while dramatically improving speed and scalability.

    The key advantages of ScyllaDB include its rewritten C++ implementation that eliminates Cassandra's expensive Java garbage collection pauses, built-in caching for fast access to frequently used data, and shard-aware drivers for direct routing of requests. This enables it to fully leverage modern multi-core servers for massive parallelism. The community is active and the latest major release, ScyllaDB Enterprise 2023.1.0 LTS, incorporates over 5,000 code commits focused on enhancing capabilities.

    ScyllaDB supports wide-column data modeling for fast read performance at scale. It includes integrated monitoring and management tools to track database health and performance. For organizations looking to boost speed and reduce costs for NoSQL workloads, ScyllaDB offers a drop-in replacement for Cassandra that delivers lower latency, higher throughput, and increased scalability with fewer nodes. Its seamless migration path makes switching from Cassandra seamless, requiring minimal code changes.

    Sample Customers
    Airbus, Globacom, WebAction
    IBM, Investing.com, mParticle, Comcast, GE, Fanatics, Ola, CERN, adgear, Samsung
    Top Industries
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    Educational Organization7%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise71%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise56%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise17%
    Large Enterprise58%
    Buyer's Guide
    NoSQL Databases
    April 2024
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: April 2024.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    768,857 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews while ScyllaDB is ranked 6th in NoSQL Databases with 2 reviews. Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2, while ScyllaDB is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ScyllaDB writes "A solution that offers good performance and flexibility to its users". Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, InfluxDB, Couchbase and Cloudera Distribution for Hadoop, whereas ScyllaDB is most compared with MongoDB, Cassandra, Couchbase, Apache HBase and Neo4j Graph Database.

    See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

    We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.