Runscope [EOL] pros and cons

Name: Runscope [EOL]
Brand: Broadcom
Rating: 4.4 (11 reviews)

Vendor: Broadcom

4.4 out of 5

11 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Leave a review

Runscope [EOL] Pros review quotes

TestEngic3b1

Test Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

May 28, 2018

The feature of automatically executing tests at a predefined time interval is great as we can be continuously testing our end-points before and after builds are deployed.

Read full review

PrMng378

Project Manager, QA Leader and Information Security Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Jun 6, 2018

As we have the APIs scheduled, we use the notifications. We know the exact moment it is breaking something that might impact the customer system, that might result in a feature not working. We know "in advance" and we can fix it before the customer notices. It helps us to be more proactive.

Read full review

it_user884064

Quality Assurance Engineer at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 6, 2018

It is a relatively reliable tool for running big amounts of API tests, which you can schedule to run periodically, as the product is very good.

Free Report: Runscope [EOL] Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Runscope [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

QaManage260f

QA Manager at a retailer

Jun 13, 2018

Environment initial variables allow our team to run tests against multiple environments on the fly.

Read full review

DevOpsEn00d9

DevOps Engineer at a tech company with 1-10 employees

Jul 25, 2018

This solution has improved our responsiveness to issues in both production and non-production environments. Through integration with Slack, our development and DevOps teams are quickly aware of issues related to new changes deployed to non-production environments, which tightens our feedback loop during testing. Through integration with PagerDuty, our DevOps resources are able to reduce the adverse impact of a given production issue.

Read full review

Directorae62

Director of Engineering at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Jul 25, 2018

It helps us verify that production deployments do not break the features our customers use.

Read full review

QualityA876f

Quality Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Jul 25, 2018

Valuable features include: Being able to add tests as sub-tests in a parent test for regression testing; notifications for tests that pass/fail; being able to customize expected results with assertions; being able to set tests to run daily.

Read full review

Brian Robison

Director, QA

Jul 25, 2018

It is a cloud-based environment for building and executing tests, which allows me to focus on building, running, and reviewing test results.

Read full review

QaAnalys6199

QA Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Jul 30, 2018

Pre-request Scripts and Post-response Scripts are very handy.

Read full review

CraigAndrew

Lead QA Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Aug 19, 2018

We love the fact that we can have our API tests run on a schedule as often as we need. We also take advantage of being able to set up different environment settings so that we can use the same test in our production, integration, and QA environments, easily. The ability to string together a number of API tests for a test suite is very important to us as well.

Read full review

Show 1 more reviews (out of 11)

Runscope [EOL] Cons review quotes

TestEngic3b1

Test Engineer at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

May 28, 2018

Reliability. I would like to see more money invested in disaster recovery testing of the application. The product should be hosted across several AWS regions so if there are issues with an EC2 instance in a particular region, the whole application won't be affected. Once or twice a year there are issues with AWS that causes the reliability of the application to suffer.

Read full review

PrMng378

Project Manager, QA Leader and Information Security Manager at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Jun 6, 2018

One thing that can be improved is the logging. Sometimes, when we have an error, we don't know how to find more information about the problem that has happened. Sometimes, it just returns something like "that gateway." More information would be a way to improve it.

Read full review

it_user884064

Quality Assurance Engineer at a consultancy with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jun 6, 2018

There are not many options for scalability.

Free Report: Runscope [EOL] Reviews and More

Learn what your peers think about Runscope [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.

QaManage260f

QA Manager at a retailer

Jun 13, 2018

If you forget to set the default environment during test creation, you have to go through every test and make sure that it is set to the environment that you prefer if using shared environments. If there was an option to force all tests within a bucket into a specific environment with one click, this would save a lot of time.

Read full review

DevOpsEn00d9

DevOps Engineer at a tech company with 1-10 employees

Jul 25, 2018

We would like the ability to configure Runscope behavior when a given test has its schedule modified. That is, in a non-production environment, we often need to pause a test (either by removing it from the schedule or adjusting its frequency) and this results in the automatic kick-off of this test in all other environments. We would like the ability to simply pause a test for a specific shared environment without causing additional tests to be started.

Read full review

Directorae62

Director of Engineering at a tech services company with 11-50 employees

Jul 25, 2018

The initial setup included a lot of repetitive manual work.

Read full review

QualityA876f

Quality Analyst at a tech vendor with 10,001+ employees

Jul 25, 2018

We would like to be able to select the actual time a test will run automatically. It appears that you can set up the automatic schedule, but the test runs based on the last time it ran and not a time you select. Since we want these tests to run in the middle of the night, it would be nice to be able to select that.

Read full review

Brian Robison

Director, QA

Jul 25, 2018

File upload is a big part of the products that we test. The lack of file upload in Runscope requires us to still use UI (Selenium) automated tests for these scenarios.

Read full review

QaAnalys6199

QA Analyst at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

Jul 30, 2018

The documentation of Runscope needs to be improved.

Read full review

CraigAndrew

Lead QA Engineer at a financial services firm with 51-200 employees

Aug 19, 2018

Navigation can be a little tricky when changing run environments and switching between test run results and editing the tests. It would be nice if you could switch the environment for all tests in a Bucket to run, rather than having to change each test environment.

Read full review

Show 1 more reviews (out of 11)