Kaspersky Total Security is a comprehensive cybersecurity suite offering robust protection through real-time monitoring, vulnerability fixing, and streamlined operations with centralized management.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Kaspersky Small Office Security | 1.2% |
| Microsoft Defender for Endpoint | 7.0% |
| CrowdStrike Falcon | 6.2% |
| Other | 85.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 17 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 5 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 96 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 51 |
| Large Enterprise | 50 |
Known for its lightweight performance and intuitive setup, Kaspersky Total Security effectively blocks threats across emails, websites, and documents. Continuous updates provide strong defenses against malware. Users find value in features like centralized management, which reduces manual workload, and a user-friendly interface. Adjustments can improve encryption, license renewal, anti-malware capabilities, and system stability while minimizing performance impact. Users recommend strengthened email protection, quicker responses to incidents, and enhanced configuration clarity, with flexibility in license upgrades and cost-effectiveness.
What are Kaspersky Total Security’s Key Features?Kaspersky Total Security is used in banking systems, where securing internal data systems and enhancing endpoint protection are critical. Businesses leverage its encryption, firewall, and VPN services for comprehensive cybersecurity management. Its versatility supports protection across multiple devices, optimizing internal networks and processes for enhanced security and performance.
| Author info | Rating | Review Summary |
|---|---|---|
| Proprietario at IL COMPUTER snc | 4.5 | I've used Kaspersky Total Security for over 10 years with commercial clients; it's stable, lightweight, and easy to set up. While the pricing could improve, overall, it's a reliable solution I consistently rate nine out of ten. |
| Owner at Maxpro Technologies | 4.0 | I've used Kaspersky Total Security for small office setups over several years, valuing its endpoint protection and ease of implementation. It's stable, effective against vulnerabilities, but could improve with better data security and performance optimization. |
| System Engineer at Kenera International Trading PLC | 4.5 | I use Kaspersky Total Security for endpoint protection and malware detection in our organization. It efficiently scans for viruses, especially from flash drives, but it can be resource-intensive. Despite this, it delivers a 60% cost reduction through enhanced security. |
| IT Manager at Lancaster Kumasi City | 4.0 | I use Kaspersky Total Security as an antivirus tool for centralized management, enabling easy deployment and system monitoring. It features useful automation, although constant improvements are made. While McAfee is currently used, Kaspersky remains efficient and valuable. |
| Scrum Master at Inalpie Enterprise | 4.0 | I use Kaspersky Total Security for net protection and find its scanning feature highly effective, providing quick virus detection and rectification. However, I believe the response time during incidents needs improvement for faster resolution. |
| Network Engineer at IP Express Nigeria Limited | 4.5 | We use Kaspersky Total Security for centrally managing endpoints with a straightforward user interface for threat scanning. However, it lacks alerts from central firewall and security devices, which are provided by our previously used solution, Meraki. |
| Senior infrastructure engineer at Cubic Information Systems | 3.0 | I have used Kaspersky Total Security across three projects, valuing its vulnerability-fixing capabilities. However, it needs improvements in anti-malware and anti-phishing policies. In comparison, Microsoft Defender offers great investigation tools for addressing malware issues. |
| Sourcing Purchasing Manager at Nexans autoelectric GmbH | 5.0 | I find Kaspersky Total Security efficient for reducing paper usage and speeding up validation in our sourcing department. However, the authorization process could be faster. No other solutions were considered, and there's no specified deployment or cloud provider. |
