Top 10 Imperva's Application Security Platform Alternatives

4.3 out of 5

78 reviews
94% willing to recommend

Top Imperva's Application Security Platform Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Imperva's Application Security Platform based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Cloudflare, Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Imperva's Application Security Platform surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat intelligence, real-time monitoring, and advanced threat mitigation, ensuring comprehensive protection against cyber threats while delivering unmatched reliability and performance in application security.

Imperva Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Imperva, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Cloudflare

4.3 out of 5

Cloudflare

4.3 out of 5

Cloudflare is ideal for its cost-effective plans, easy setup, and strong CDN, appealing to small and mid-sized businesses. In comparison, Imperva caters to enterprises with its advanced features and reliable support, justifying its premium pricing for comprehensive security needs.

Download Cloudflare vs. Imperva's Application Security Platform Report

Pricing

Cloudflare has a minimal setup cost, providing an affordable entry point, while Imperva's setup cost is higher, reflecting a more extensive initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Cloudflare has a minimal setup cost, providing an affordable entry point, while Imperva's setup cost is higher, reflecting a more extensive initial investment.

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks

4.2 out of 5

Imperva's Application Security Platform excels in real-time traffic analysis and ease of configuration. In comparison, Prisma Cloud focuses on multi-cloud security and container protection. Imperva emphasizes cost-effectiveness, while Prisma Cloud offers extensive feature integration for complex environments.

Download Imperva's Application Security Platform vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Report

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform offers a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, which may imply a higher initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform offers a lower setup cost compared to Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks, which may imply a higher initial investment.

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

Microsoft Azure Application Gateway

3.7 out of 5

Imperva excels with advanced security features and analytics, appealing to enterprises prioritizing defense. In comparison, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway offers cost-effective security within Azure's ecosystem, suitable for businesses seeking integration ease and load balancing in their cloud infrastructure.

Download Imperva's Application Security Platform vs. Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Report

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform has a setup cost advantage over Microsoft Azure Application Gateway. In contrast, Microsoft's product may incur higher initial fees, potentially affecting budget-conscious buyers.

View comparison

Pricing

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Azure Front Door

4.4 out of 5

Imperva Application Security Platform offers extensive security features such as DDoS protection and real-time monitoring but may have high costs. In comparison, Azure Front Door provides cost-effective options with global load balancing and flexibility, potentially leading to increased expenses with advanced configurations.

Download Azure Front Door vs. Imperva's Application Security Platform Report

Pricing

Imperva's setup cost is higher than Azure Front Door, making Imperva less cost-effective initially. Azure Front Door provides a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva's setup cost is higher than Azure Front Door, making Imperva less cost-effective initially. Azure Front Door provides a more budget-friendly setup, appealing to cost-sensitive users.

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

F5 Advanced WAF

4.3 out of 5

Imperva offers ease of use and flexible cloud deployment, appealing to those seeking simplicity and adaptability. In comparison, F5 provides stability and comprehensive load balancing, suiting businesses prioritizing advanced threat detection and on-premises support.

Download F5 Advanced WAF vs. Imperva's Application Security Platform Report

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform often highlights lesser setup costs, while F5 Advanced WAF users report higher initial expenses, underlining a significant difference in initial investment.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform often highlights lesser setup costs, while F5 Advanced WAF users report higher initial expenses, underlining a significant difference in initial investment.

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

AWS WAF

4.0 out of 5

Imperva provides comprehensive security features suitable for larger enterprises requiring robust protection. In comparison, AWS WAF offers cost-effective scalability ideal for budget-conscious operations. Imperva integrates well with hybrid clouds, while AWS WAF benefits from seamless AWS service integration.

Download AWS WAF vs. Imperva's Application Security Platform Report

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform requires a high setup cost, while AWS WAF offers a more cost-effective setup solution.

View comparison

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform requires a high setup cost, while AWS WAF offers a more cost-effective setup solution.

Fortinet FortiWeb

3.9 out of 5

Fortinet FortiWeb

3.9 out of 5

Imperva Application Security Platform excels in advanced protection with features like SQL injection prevention. In comparison, Fortinet FortiWeb's strong integration capabilities and cost-effective pricing appeal to those seeking streamlined, on-premises security with comprehensive templates for simplified deployment.

Download Fortinet FortiWeb vs. Imperva's Application Security Platform Report

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform offers a cost-effective setup, while Fortinet FortiWeb involves a higher initial investment. Fortinet FortiWeb's increased cost is due to its wider range of advanced features compared to Imperva's solution.

View comparison

Pricing

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

NetScaler

4.2 out of 5

NetScaler excels in load balancing and flexible deployment but faces challenges with script support and high costs. In comparison, Imperva focuses on robust security features like DDoS protection but needs improvements in minimizing false positives and refining user interfaces.

Download Imperva's Application Security Platform vs. NetScaler Report

Pricing

NetScaler's setup cost is competitive, while Imperva's Application Security Platform has a higher upfront investment. NetScaler users appreciate the cost-effectiveness, whereas Imperva users note the comprehensive security features justifying the expense.

View comparison

Pricing

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

HAProxy

4.1 out of 5

Imperva offers comprehensive DDoS and WAF protection, making it ideal for enterprise security. In comparison, HAProxy provides reliable and flexible load balancing with cost-effective SSL offloading, suiting users seeking dependable and customizable configurations for network services.

Download HAProxy vs. Imperva's Application Security Platform Report

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform has a higher setup cost compared to HAProxy, offering extensive features suited for large enterprises, while HAProxy provides a cost-effective solution with essential features ideal for smaller businesses seeking affordability.

View comparison

Pricing

Arbor DDoS

4.3 out of 5

Arbor DDoS

4.3 out of 5

Imperva focuses on application layer security with WAF and bot management, appealing to those needing user-friendly integration and analytics. In comparison, Arbor targets network-level defenses, ideal for ISP environments with cloud signaling and robust threat intelligence, despite higher costs.

Download Arbor DDoS vs. Imperva's Application Security Platform Report

Pricing

Imperva's Application Security Platform has an affordable setup cost, making it accessible for small businesses, while Arbor DDoS requires a higher initial investment, appealing more to enterprises needing extensive DDoS protection, highlighting significant cost differences between the ...

View comparison

Pricing