We use the product for Layer Three and Layer Two distribution and access.
We've used the solution for a long time. They last quite a while.
I already had a background with Cisco, so getting used to their system was a little bit complex. The way you configure a VLAN in an access port or in a VLAN to be allowed in the trunk was totally different. They have a concept there with hybrid VLAN, and it kind of made things complex for me.
We had a few issues with integration.
In the company, we're using Huawei wireless and the wireless controller, and those switches are the ones that made the transition between the clients and the WiFi server, and we had a few problems.
Some switches in our network are end-of-life. They shouldn't be there anymore. They're too old. They have already improved lots of things, however, the mistakes here will fall on our laps as we are using end-of-life devices, and they don't give support anymore for that.
We've used the solution for five years or more.
It wasn't that stable at all. We had lots of issues due to the definitions, or due to the way they set up VLANs or the types of VLANs. We gave room for Layer Two Mac addresses. We had always the need to go there and reboot that switch or unplug a cord or LAN cable from there.
We didn't just scale it. We only had seven switches. They worked well, however, we had lots of issues with flooding.
We didn't use technical support. I wouldn't be able to rate their services.
I've used Cisco in the past.
The initial setup was complex. I'd rate it two out of five in terms of ease of setup. It was a bit difficult.
We handled the initial setup in-house. We didn't have any outside technicians or consultants.
There aren't any licensing costs. It's a one-off payment at the beginning and then you can use them for as long as you like. If you want to expand or use another service, you do need to pay for that, however.
I'm not sure if the company has a business relationship with Huawei. We might have in the past. I'm not sure if that is still the case.
I'd advise potential new users to first get the concepts right before implementing them.
I'd rate the solution a four out of ten. It wasn't good, but it wasn't terrible.