Huawei Ethernet Switches Reviews

It is cheap. Another reason is that we cannot change to another product already. It's GPON, and it's not quite cheap. Something might probably change around half a million.

Generally, the core features of wireless networking equipment from Cisco, Aruba, and Ruckus are similar. All three vendors offer the ability to configure basic features such as DHCP, routing, and security.

Huawei has a lot of issues; it's not in sync properly. For instance, if the ONT is down, there's another problem with another ONT that is not functioning correctly. Even after configuring the siding, I cannot reach some other side, and I don't know why it's happening.

Another concern was with the ONT and using fiber.

We recently migrated from Nokia to Huawei. After migrating, at least, there were some failures, some of which impacted operations.

So far, not very stable.  

We've had an issue with one of the Power Trip ports not working properly.

It's scalable. We can add new switches to an ORT easily. This is not the same as adding new switches to an ONT, but it is a similar process. We can use a GPON splitter to add more users to the network, which is comparable to how traditional networks are scaled.

We've been using the Nokia switches for a few years, and we have about 1000 users. We just started using the Huawei switches this year, so we don't have any data on how many users are using them yet.

The technical support from Huawei is not very good. We've had to wait a week or a month for them to provide a solution to some of our problems. So it's quite time-consuming.

For the switches, the premise set is done for maintenance.

I often draw comparisons with Cisco, where we can use the command line for the show, whereas with Huawei, it is displayed differently. However, it is essential to note that all the features supported by Cisco are also supported by Huawei.

We have a vendor, and the project team is responsible for the deployment.

We maintain the solution, but we still have a managed service from Vendor. If we have any troubleshooting or issues related to the vendor, they handle it.

It is a china brand. This is not a good product, but it's very cheap compared with Cisco, another Ruckus, kind of compared with Huawei, Huawei from China, the prices are very cheap.

We are using router switches as far as the server. Everything we are using.

I would recommend using HPE or Cisco switches instead. I would give them a six out of ten. They're not the worst switches I've used, but they're not the best either.

The primary use case of the solution is used in the Telecom, Customer Edge where services are being deployed.

With Huawei Ethernet Switches, the backline capacity on our switches has improved, and the port density has. Ports are available at 1G, 10G, and 100G levels. This means we only need one new switch to add more value, as opposed to our previous 10G switches.

The required functionalities align with telecom requirements and have improved from a capacity perspective. Additionally, power efficiency has been added, resulting in a more stable work platform. We used Juniper but struggled with it due to bugs and other issues. However, I have not seen anything like that with Huawei. Huawei provides free-of-cost batch upgrades to all networks worldwide if they find something that needs to be upgraded. Huawei usually recommends what we require so that they have symmetrical patches worldwide.

The solution can improve by adding virtualized switch functionality. Huawei mentioned virtual switches in one of the product sheets, but when we got to the deployment phase, it turned out that they didn't actually include virtual switching functionality. Other than that, the switch and network are performing well and meeting our requirements.

I have been using the solution for eight years.

The solution is extremely stable.

We purchase the switch with 1U and it is not modular. We have to live with that. Or, if we have 2U, 3U, or 4U switches, we already have those four. It's not that complex to scale. We have to do the ordering and it takes three months. 

We previously used Juniper and switched to Huawei Ethernet Switches after we completed an RFP. Juniper was cheaper but did not meet the rest of our requirements. Huawei's telecom services such as media gateways, MSCs, and Packet Core are better. The main reason we switched to Huawei is that they also offer free of cost web of IP cost.

The dedicated team here at the client's office assists with installation and other tasks. However, for anything configuration-related, we initially communicate with the subcontractors, specifying what we want. We then distribute IP addresses and other necessary information. We do not always need to be involved in the process; the subcontractors are already familiar with the design. We base our switch deployments on purchase orders from Juniper. Once the switches are delivered, we lock them down and they become automatic.

The full deployment takes between one month and 45 days.

The implementation was completed in-house with the assistance of a subcontractor.

I give the solution eight out of ten.

The solution requires maintenance but it is not difficult.

I recommend the solution for the double platform, from a stability perspective, and according to the need of the organization.

We provide Huawei Ethernet Switches as a solution our customers based on their project requirements; we prefer this solution over Aruba due to its affordability. But Huawei Ethernet Switches have almost equivalent features to their Aruba counterparts. Huawei can be considered as a tier-1 switches provider. 

Huawei Ethernet Switches has multiple security features but the campus switches feature is vital. For some projects of our company, Huawei Ethernet Switches are more affordable than Aruba solutions. But for layer 3 or high-level switches, in some cases the Aruba switches are cost-effective, thus the price depends upon the project, configuration and the design. 

Huawei Ethernet Switches also have effective network switching features. 

I have been working with Huawei Ethernet Switches. 

Our company works with Huawei Ethernet Switches, which are mostly for enterprise-level businesses or hospitals, to be specific. The product can be easily scaled by integrating additional hardware or extending the licenses. 

Huawei Ethernet Switches can be easily configured and deployed. The configuration of the solution takes around a few hours but the total deployment may take longer. 

Huawei Ethernet Switches are available at a competitive market price. Competitor solutions from Cisco, Aruba and Juniper almost have a similar price point to Huawei Ethernet Switches. 

Our organization's system integrators analyze the main features of Huawei Ethernet Switches and competitor solutions and implement the ideal one for the client. The vendors also interact with our company's customers to convince them about the product through a pros-and-cons analysis. 

Huawei Ethernet Switches were successful in improving network efficiency for the clients of our organization. The solution matched our clients' requirements across the new sites and projects. 

Presently, the solution doesn't offer any AI integrations with the product hardware. I would recommend Huawei Ethernet Switches to others. I would overall rate the product an eight out of ten. 

The most valuable aspect of Huawei Ethernet Switches is their excellent scalability.

In the future, incorporating AI features into Ethernet switches, particularly in the controller base, would be beneficial. This could help pinpoint errors, diagnose issues, and improve overall efficiency. Innovation and competitive pricing are key to staying ahead in the market.

Huawei's scalability is excellent, offering a wide range of switches from low-end to carrier-grade, catering to various deployment needs. They cover the spectrum from low-end to extremely high-end switches, including service provider-level equipment. I would rate the scalability as a ten out of ten.

Huawei's support is solid, especially in Malaysia, with robust RMA, software support, and flexibility in additional assistance. I would rate the support around a nine out of ten.

Positive

Pricing has slightly increased but remains competitive, and the supply chain during COVID-19 was less impacted compared to competitors like Cisco.

Competitors like Cisco face challenges due to inconsistent support and retrenchment issues. While brands like Arista and Juniper are present, they haven't reached the same level of market share as Cisco. However, Huawei faces competition mainly from other Chinese brands, particularly in the security sector.

Huawei Ethernet Switches are generally solid with features comparable to other vendors like Cisco and HPE.

I wouldn't recommend Huawei Ethernet Switches for companies without robust support contracts, as Huawei's support and RMA services are strong. My concerns about Huawei switches are often political rather than technical, as there haven't been reported security breaches.

Managing Huawei Ethernet Switches can be done via web-based or CLI interfaces, with some customers opting for Huawei's SDN controller for easier management.

Overall, I would rate Huawei Ethernet Switches as a ten out of ten.

We use Huawei Ethernet Switches for business networks and connectivity.

The solution’s stability could be improved. Huawei Ethernet Switches have not automated its firmware.

I have been using Huawei Ethernet Switches for two years.

I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten for stability.

Huawei Ethernet Switches is a scalable solution. The solution's scalability depends on the model that you buy. We have the number of users for the solution ranging from 20 to 600.

The solution’s technical support is good.

We previously used different solutions like Cisco, Aruba, Avaya, D-Link, and TP-Link.

Since I am a technical person, the solution's initial setup is easy for me.

I deployed Huawei Ethernet Switches in 20 minutes.

We only pay one-off instead of paying recurring license fees.

We need two people for the solution's deployments and maintenance. I would recommend the solution to other users. Once you purchase and finish configuring the solution, you don't do much configuration on it anymore.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight or nine out of ten.

We use the product for IT infrastructure requirements.

Huawei Ethernet Switches is a stable product.

The product’s pricing needs improvement. It could be more stable as well.

We have been using Huawei Ethernet Switches for six years. At present, we use the latest version.

The product is stable. I rate its stability an eight out of ten. It could be better.

We have around more than 10,000 Huawei Ethernet Switches end users at our clients’ educational institutions.

The technical support services are satisfactory.

The initial setup is straightforward. The deployment time depends on the type of project.

Our team manages the product implementation for our customers.

Huawei Ethernet Switches’s price could be better.

I recommend Huawei Ethernet Switches and rate it an eight out of ten.

Our company uses the solution to provide aggregation and access networks for customers. 

The solution is very flexible with many different options. 

The price, memory, and processor are good. 

Certain regulatory issues in a lot of countries cause limitations because access to these features are based on cost. 

For example, the RF timers for Ethernet ring protection with Juniper or Nokia are set to default at ten milliseconds. But the solution is set to one second. The convergence time is comparatively very high. 

The solution should take care with regulatory issues at the local or regional licensing levels. Tajas Networks is an example that does not have the same regulatory issues. 

I have been using the solution for eight years. 

The solution is stable so is rated a six out of ten. 

The solution has average scalability so is rated a five out of ten.

I contacted technical support for a situation and they did not respond with an answer after ten days. I personally went to my lab and resolved the issue within 48 hours. 

Technical support is rated a three out of ten. 

Negative

We previously used Nokia switches but have replaced them with Juniper, Cisco, and the solution.

The setup is not too easy or difficult so is rated a five out of ten. 

We implement the solution for customers. 

The pricing is good so is rated an eight out of ten. 

The solution is an anytime, easy-to-go option. Its flexibility and cost are major factors.

We also use Juniper and Cisco switches. Most vendors are good when comparing features for switches. 

Tejas Networks has switches that are the best in transmission equipment because they do not have regulatory issues. 

First priority when selecting switches should be if it will meet the regulatory requirements for the country or region. 

I rate the solution a six out of ten. 

Huawei Ethernet Switches support multiple vendors. You can integrate them according to the network scenario. Their power consumption is low. 

The solution needs to be more user-friendly. 

I have been working with the product for two years. 

The tool is stable. 

I have never contacted support. 

Huawei Ethernet Switches' deployment is not complex. To deploy them, you must end the IP addresses and configure the port. 

The solution's pricing is in the middle, but you will be charged when you upgrade the tenant. 

I rate the overall solution an eight out of ten.