Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

XSKY XEOS vs Zadara comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

XSKY XEOS
Ranking in File and Object Storage
38th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Zadara
Ranking in File and Object Storage
21st
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
10
Ranking in other categories
All-Flash Storage (32nd), Software Defined Storage (SDS) (18th), Compute Service (14th), Public Cloud Storage Services (17th)
 

Featured Reviews

Use XSKY XEOS?
Share your opinion
Giovanni Mantelli - PeerSpot reviewer
May 17, 2022
Helpful support, simple initial setup, and easy configuration
We use services on Zadara for our customers in Brazil The most valuable features of Zadara are its visibility and simplicity to use. In the next release, there can be some improvements to the web console by adding more features because the console is simple. Additionally, the calculator could…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The pricing and licensing are very simple and the cost is predictable, although, like everything that you pay for as you use, you have to be mindful of what you're using."
"It is a nice licensing model and it makes it quite simple because we just pay for what we use, and the bill that comes shows us exactly what customers are using what resources."
"One of the factors that ruled out several providers was cost. They were way too expensive for the volume of data that we needed and the speed at which we needed to be able to manage it. There aren't a lot of providers that can do that."
"If you just take the street price of Zadara Storage Cloud and look up the price or cost per hour, then you could think that Zadara Storage Cloud is extremely expensive or a solution only for enterprise use. That is not true. You need to compare the entire system. This means that you don't stop looking at just the street price, but you need to consider all the features, requirements, and costs of support as well as the extra cost that other vendors have. Other players just play with hidden, additional costs. Everything is included in Zadara Storage Cloud's licensing cost; what you get is what you pay for."
"For our use, it's appropriately priced and overall, it's proved to be very cost-effective against other tier-one vendors."
"The pricing is very competitive and the fact that they have very compelling discounts for multi-year commitments is great."
"The price of Zadara is very good and it covers everything. There is no subscription needed."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which File and Object Storage solutions are best for your needs.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
21%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

1. Alibaba 2. Baidu 3. ByteDance 4. Ctrip 5. Didi Chuxing 6. JD.com 7. Kuaishou 8. Meituan 9. NetEase 10. Pony.ai 11. Tencent 12. Tianjin University 13. Tongji University 14. University of Science and Technology of China 15. Yandex 16. Zoom 17. Zhejiang University 18. Zhongguancun Software Park 19. China Mobile 20. China Unicom 21. China Telecom 22. CITIC Securities 23. ICBC 24. Ping An Insurance 25. State Grid 26. Tencent Cloud 27. Alibaba Cloud 28. Baidu Cloud 28. JD.com Cloud 29. Kuaishou Cloud 30. Meituan Cloud
Time, Inc. A&E Network, The Washington Post, News UK, McGraw Hill, Gilt, Toshiba, Deloitte, VMware
Find out what your peers are saying about MinIO, Red Hat, Dell Technologies and others in File and Object Storage. Updated: September 2024.
813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.