Splunk On-Call vs xMatters comparison

Splunk and Everbridge are both solutions in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category. Splunk is ranked #12 with an average rating of 9.0, while Everbridge is ranked #14. Splunk holds a 3.4% mindshare in IMS, compared to Everbridge’s 4.9% mindshare. Additionally, 84% of Splunk users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 96% of Everbridge users who would recommend it.

Splunk On-Call

Read 12 Splunk On-Call reviews

1,715 Views
1,338 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

xMatters

Read 31 xMatters reviews

2,603 Views
2,317 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Splunk On-Call

xMatters

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 2, 2025

xMatters and Splunk On-Call are incident management tools. xMatters is advantageous in pricing and support, while Splunk On-Call offers superior features.

Features: xMatters integrates with various service management tools, automates workflows, and enables real-time notifications. Splunk On-Call focuses on alerting, scheduling, and offers integration with Splunk’s analytics, creating an enhanced incident management environment.

Room for Improvement: xMatters could improve its advanced analytics capabilities and offer more native integrations with third-party tools. It may also enhance complexity management for larger teams. Splunk On-Call would benefit from a more flexible pricing model and improved support for non-Splunk users. It could also enhance its UI for broader accessibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: xMatters offers easy deployment with comprehensive support and documentation, ensuring an intuitive user experience. Splunk On-Call provides strong deployment and integration for Splunk users, although it might require more setup effort for new users.

Pricing and ROI: xMatters offers flexible pricing that delivers a high ROI, catering to diverse organizational needs. Splunk On-Call’s higher cost reflects its extensive feature set, which can be valuable for analytics-focused teams, though it may be less appealing for cost-sensitive organizations.

To learn more, read our detailed Splunk On-Call vs. xMatters Report (Updated: June 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Splunk On-Call vs. xMatters

June 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 906,887 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Splunk On-Call

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

12th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

xMatters

Ranking in IT Alerting and Incident Management

14th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the IT Alerting and Incident Management category, the mindshare of Splunk On-Call is 3.4%, down from 4.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of xMatters is 4.9%, down from 6.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

IT Alerting and Incident Management Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Splunk On-Call	3.4%
xMatters	4.9%
Other	91.7%

IT Alerting and Incident Management

Featured Reviews

Ramani Happy

Dev Ops Engineer at Data Elicit Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Streamlined incident response has reduced downtime and improved on-call collaboration

A few things I would improve in Splunk On-Call. Honestly, the reporting and analysis side feels a bit weak. If I want to deep dive into the on-call load, including MTTD and MTTR rates, I kind of have to export data and build my own dashboard, which is not as out-of-the-box as I would prefer. The UI has improved, but it still feels a little chunky in certain areas, particularly when managing schedules. When I have a lot of teams, it can get messy. Additionally, the pricing model is per user, which starts to get expensive as the team scales.

Read full review

Dean-Robinson

Sr. Developer at a media company with 10,001+ employees

A versatile solution with excellent logging capabilities that reduced our time to resolve

The reporting functionality could be improved, though I know that's something xMatters, inc. is working on. For example, sometimes I need to go into the platform and find users who aren't in groups that have been created recently, haven't logged in and so on. Previously, this was hard work, but they added loads of filters, making it more accessible. Still, the ability to create custom-designated reports that I could run and schedule would be fantastic for me. It would be good if they keep improving the reporting functionality, as it can be somewhat restrictive sometimes. There are a couple of improvements that xMatters could make to the incident hub, where we can manage high-priority incidents. More sharing capability between collaborating incident managers would be good to see, including the ability to whiteboard. That would allow them to share and sketch out ideas while looking for a solution. Those two features are essential, and that's why we want to use the solution in conjunction with Everbridge because xMatters doesn't have them.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"My VP of Operations is ecstatic about the VictorOps product."

"Technical support is an A+ or a 10/10; if I could give an 11/10, I would, and it is what I love about them."

"It reduces the communication around CI/CD and production errors in about 90% of the cases and made our support tasks much easier."

"I would recommend VictorOps for global distributed support teams."

"Since implementing Splunk On-Call, our mean time to acknowledge has dropped significantly, and we have fewer escalations to senior engineering for things that could have been caught earlier."

"VictorOps has decreased the meantime to acknowledge an incident management process, our developers can be on-call faster when we are using this solution, and we can fix our incidents much quicker."

"Splunk On-Call has helped my organization to improve response times, reduce missed alerts, and coordinate teams more efficiently during incidents."

"The alert calling feature is the best because notifications are delivered via phone messages."

More Splunk On-Call pros

"It reduces the amount of oversight required, and consequently, the amount of time to assign and get a response on a ticket."

"The most valuable features are the ability to have groups and then have an on-call rotation in the groups. Outlook lacks both these features. Outlook gives you the ability to contact an individual or groups, but you can't contact them based on an on-call rotation, and you can't have built-in timing escalations inside of that. xMatters gives you the ability to do that, which is important when you have 50 or so people in the team, but you only want to contact the person who is on-call. You don't create any unnecessary noise. xMatters allows you to page the right person who is on-call versus just creating excessive noise."

"Using xMatters to notify our IT and Emergency Management partners is vital for bringing back IT services and notifying our partners about emergencies."

"There are a lot of tools that can do standard notifications, however, the one feature that separates xMatters from others is the ability for it to integrate with any system that has REST API or SOAP API capabilities."

"The integration possibilities that xMatters offers are very good, with a lot of integrations built within the applications that are just plug and play, which is massively beneficial for us."

"We use xMatters for alarming infrastructure outages and failures of batch jobs (post-processing)."

"Simple features create flow sets and build APIs for integrations."

"This automation of incident notification processes has immensely affected our ability to respond to incidents."

More xMatters pros

Cons

"The third-party configuration tool could be easier to use."

"User management has to be improved and more user types need to be added as there is currently only Admin or User."

"We chose to move away from the HP product as far as our monitoring goes and dealing with system-generated alerts, simply because it took too much time and effort to manage the APM platform."

"The solution can be improved by including a wider list of permissions."

"There could be improvements with communicating an incident or alert."

"Should have more YouTube webinars."

"The only feature that we are currently waiting on right now is really kind of an annoyance factor: when we get on the timeline on the main dashboard, there’s an ACK All button."

"Another example is that you cannot check the incidents created in VictorOps from the previous Friday."

More Splunk On-Call cons

"While they do have an extensive library of integrations, sometimes those integrations or custom integrations, require a more technical level of expertise in products outside of xMatters, such as Java."

"A lot of the issues that we've had have already been addressed. However, they could be clearer with the actual throughput and the costs. The throughput that we signed up for was a lot lower than what we needed, and we had to pay a lot more to get the throughput that we needed."

"I would like to see some more user templates. There are roles — administrator, user, etc. — but it would be nice to create a user template that restricted what people assigned that role could do."

"This is our biggest issue: licensing."

"It has not improved our organization."

"The user interface could be more intuitive. Once you know what you're doing, you're fine. However, if you don't know where to start then it can be a bit difficult to figure out how to make it work and how it will function together with different tools in the Flow Designer."

"The user interface could be more intuitive. When you are not familiar with integrations and you're starting fresh, looking for where to begin, it is a bit daunting and not as clear as it could be."

"The REST API is still missing some important functionality, which we require."

More xMatters cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"You pay for the user, not the number of alerts. Therefore, xMatters provides a better ROI, if you can leverage it for notifications based on alerts from other monitoring tools. "

"This is a subscription-based, SaaS solution."

"I'm not really involved with the cost standpoint. I've only heard rumors of how much it costs, and if it costs what I think it costs, its cost is very high as compared to a lot of other tools that we're using here. It seems on the higher end from a cost standpoint."

"It feels like good value in the sense that the service is excellent. The people above me who look at such things have renewed it a couple of times, and I think they would have thought whether it was good value, whether it was wildly overpriced, or whether there were better and cheaper alternatives. So, from that perspective, the pricing is fair and proper."

"Pricing is pretty straightforward and listed on their website. I recommend starting small and expanding later."

"There's a significant difference between a full license, which allows people to respond to and acknowledge receipt of messages, and a more scaled-down license, which just allows people to see the notification. So we need to evaluate what license they need when onboarding new users because the full license is significantly more expensive."

"Cost is probably my biggest concern. I know the solution was recently acquired by Everbridge, and Everbridge was one of the competitors that was included in our RFP five years ago. Everbridge's costs were astronomical compared to where every other solution was, not just xMatters."

"It seemed comparable or more reasonable than some of the other solutions, at least when we evaluated it. There are no extra costs in addition to the standard licensing fees. Its cost is good, given the breadth of features provided by xMatters."

More xMatters pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Alerting and Incident Management solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

906,887 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Performing Arts

10%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

10%

Performing Arts

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	1
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	9

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	4
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	24

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for VictorOps?

The pricing aspect is per-user licensing, which is standard for this category, making it competitive compared to PagerDuty. In the past, we used PagerDuty, but it is not cheap once you start adding...

See all answers

What needs improvement with VictorOps?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for VictorOps?

I have been using Splunk On-Call for nearly about two years. Our main use is incident alerting and on-call scheduling for our engineering and DevOps team. Basically, whenever something goes down, a...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs Splunk On-Call

Compared 19% of the time

Opsgenie vs Splunk On-Call

Compared 18% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs Splunk On-Call

Compared 15% of the time

IBM Cloud Event Management vs Splunk On-Call

Compared 11% of the time

Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk On-Call

Compared 2% of the time

More Splunk On-Call Competitors

PagerDuty Operations Cloud vs xMatters

Compared 24% of the time

Opsgenie vs xMatters

Compared 19% of the time

Everbridge IT Alerting vs xMatters

Compared 18% of the time

FireHydrant vs xMatters

Compared 10% of the time

BigPanda vs xMatters

Compared 3% of the time

More xMatters Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Splunk On-Call

July 2026

Download Splunk On-Call product report

Buyer's Guide

xMatters

July 2026

Download xMatters product report

Also Known As

VictorOps

xMatters IT Management

Overview

Splunk On-Call offers seamless on-call scheduling and alert escalation with robust third-party integration, providing efficient incident management and resolution capabilities.

Splunk On-Call facilitates effective IT alert management by delivering on-call scheduling, alert escalation, and comprehensive integration with monitoring systems. The platform's capabilities include smooth third-party interactions and the transmogrifier feature, which enhances message customization. Users benefit from efficient alert notifications via phone or text, a user-friendly interface streamlining scheduling, and detailed timelines supporting root cause analysis. It is especially useful in IT environments where quick incident response and communication are critical. Users appreciate the aid in identifying responsible contacts during on-call rotations and deploying on-premises situations involving numerous team members.

What features enhance Splunk On-Call?

Seamless On-Call Scheduling: Organizes and simplifies duty rotations efficiently.
Effective Alert Escalation: Ensures critical issues reach the appropriate personnel swiftly.
Comprehensive Third-Party Integration: Connects easily with monitoring tools to streamline workflows.
Transmogrifier Feature: Customizes message content to improve communication clarity.
Automatic Solution Reporting: Aids in swift issue resolution through detailed reports.
Efficient Alert Notifications: Offers swift communication via phone and text notifications.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies management of schedules and overrides.

What benefits and ROI should users expect when utilizing Splunk On-Call?

Reduced Incident Response Time: Accelerates team reaction to critical alerts.
Enhanced Communication: Facilitates clearer and quicker interaction within teams.
Flexibility: Adapts to specific organizational requirements effortlessly.
Improved Root Cause Analysis: Provides comprehensive timelines and reports for deep dives.

Splunk On-Call is often implemented in IT departments of large organizations, where teams manage on-call operations and incident responses. Particularly beneficial in sectors requiring rapid reaction times, like tech companies or service providers, it aids developers in swiftly resolving service interruptions to maintain operational continuity and customer satisfaction.

Splunk

xMatters provides robust automated notifications and incident management, enhancing alerting and critical IT incident handling with seamless integrations, ensuring timely communications.

xMatters is designed for efficient incident management and streamlined IT alerting. It offers flexibility through integrations with ServiceNow, Slack, and others, enhancing communication and workflow management during critical events. Users highlight the SaaS model, customizable on-call scheduling, and effective communication tools. These features reduce incident response times, enhance message delivery, and support team collaboration across platforms.

What features make xMatters stand out?

REST API Automation: Facilitates seamless integration and automation.
Intuitive UI: Simplifies the user experience for managing workflows.
Workflow Builder: Enhances customization for incident processes.
Integration Flexibility: Supports various tools like ServiceNow and Slack.
Customizable Scheduling: Offers tailored on-call schedules and escalation paths.
Automated Notifications: Streamlines incident response times.
Robust Logging: Ensures reliability in tracking system activities.
Device Management: Offers comprehensive control over notification devices.
Self-Service Capabilities: Empowers users in managing their alerts and settings.
Conference Bridging: Facilitates communication during incident resolution.

What benefits should users consider in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Enhanced by seamless integrations.
Improved Incident Response: Driven by automated notification and escalation pathways.
User Empowerment: Through self-service and device management features.
Accessibility: Enabled by a SaaS-based infrastructure.
Collaboration: Boosted through messaging and conference features.

xMatters supports industries in managing IT incidents and emergency notifications. Teams prioritize alerts, maintain on-call schedules, and automate response workflows, particularly integrating with tools like ServiceNow for critical event handling. Its application in infrastructure monitoring and proactive engagement is notable across sectors.

Everbridge

Sample Customers

NVIDIA, Cisco, NBC, Rackspace, Intuit, DirectTV, NASCAR, Arrow Electronics, Alliance Health, NetApp, Edmunds, New York Times, Return Path, Sony Playstation, CA Technologies, Sphero, Symantic, HBO, Weatherford, Blackboard, Epic Games

Over 2.7 million users trust xMatters daily at successful startups and global giants including athenahealth, BMC Software, Box, Credit Suisse, Danske Bank, Experian, NVIDIA, ViaSat and Vodafone. xMatters is headquartered in San Ramon, California and has offices worldwide. Visit our website to see how business like yours found solutions with xMatters.

Buyer's Guide

Splunk On-Call vs. xMatters

June 2026

Free Report: Splunk On-Call vs. xMatters

Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk On-Call vs. xMatters and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

906,887 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Splunk On-Call vs. xMatters report.

See our list of best IT Alerting and Incident Management vendors.

We monitor all IT Alerting and Incident Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.