No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Stitch vs Tray.io comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Stitch
Ranking in Cloud Data Integration
13th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.0
Number of Reviews
11
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tray.io
Ranking in Cloud Data Integration
21st
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Process Automation (26th), Low-Code Development Platforms (27th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (16th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Stitch is 1.5%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tray.io is 1.4%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Cloud Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Stitch1.5%
Tray.io1.4%
Other97.1%
Cloud Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Jason Hale - PeerSpot reviewer
Enterprise Architect at Waikato Regional Council
Data team has transformed diverse environmental streams and now delivers real-time insights
The best thing that we've seen coming out of Stitch is the Talend and Qlik relationship becoming more of a single entity rather than two entities. A couple of years ago there was a distinction between Stitch and Qlik. The biggest challenge when we were dealing with both was that we felt like we were dealing with two different companies. They are quickly merging the two different entities into a single one, and by around the end of this year, they're planning to basically consolidate everything. Until then, it does get a little bit complicated when we have Qlik and Stitch components together. It's not quite exactly one solution. That's probably the biggest negative at the moment. Each month we're seeing improvements in the cloud platform, and they're coming out with capabilities that we haven't even thought about that are going to make our lives easier. Probably the biggest negative they have is they're doing so much good stuff, but we don't know about it. It just appears and then we figure it out ourselves, but the communication of changes could be improved. However, the positives are that they're changing so much at the moment.
Amrit Dash - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation Engineer at a educational organization with 11-50 employees
Automated student enrollments have reduced manual work and now free our team for higher-value support
Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-centric, making it difficult for a non-technical team member to modify or troubleshoot workflows. Introducing a more intuitive visual interface similar to what we have in make.com right now would make the platform much more collaborative and easier to work with for any non-technical folks or newly onboarded engineers, allowing them to be briefed faster. Visual debugging is another area where troubleshooting complex nested loops can feel very abstract. Having clearer, more visual step-by-step data tracking during test runs would speed up the development and testing process. The pricing model is geared heavily towards enterprise budgets; offering more flexible mid-market pricing tiers would make it more accessible for a growing organization that wants a small start and scale up gradually. The core platform security is highly robust and easily meets our requirements for SOC 2 and GDPR compliance. However, when utilizing their AI features such as Merlin AI with sensitive student data, we maintain a very cautious approach. While Tray.io provides enterprise-grade governance guardrails and data masking capabilities, our internal compliance policies prevent us from passing any personally identifiable student information directly through AI-driven processors. We trust Tray.io's underlying infrastructure security, but we believe organizations must still enforce strict data filtering protocols on their end to ensure student privacy is maintained. During our evaluation, we tested the AI capabilities in a sandbox environment, primarily using it to generate workflow drafts and natural language prompts from web data schemas. Strength-wise, it is highly capable when it comes to translating simple text descriptions into functional workflow templates. It serves as a great accelerator, helping to map standard files quickly and reducing the initial setup time for basic integrations. For issues, in the case of highly custom APIs or deeply nested data structures, accuracy declines. We noticed occasional misinterpretation of complex schemas, meaning our developers still had to manually review and correct the outputs. It is a highly helpful productivity booster but still requires human oversight for enterprise-grade reliability.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Stitch has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to create MVPs quickly."
"The setup process for Stitch was pretty easy, with a plug and play approach where the data is immediately available."
"Easy setup and easy change management are the best features Stitch offers, along with a good admin panel."
"After setting up Stitch, that pipeline maintenance dropped down to practically zero, cutting our data integration and engineering workload by at least eighty to ninety percent and allowing us to get data into our dashboards in real time instead of waiting days for manual updates."
"We've got a project at the moment that we estimated the integration was going to be around $200,000 to $300,000, and we've been able to achieve the integration for less than a tenth of that, doing it in-house using Stitch."
"The best features Stitch offers are that I can copy the designs directly to Figma, which has helped my team and me tremendously because in the beginning we had to design the application from scratch, but now we can get inspirations from Stitch and copy directly from Stitch to shorten our time."
"Stitch saved a lot of time, gave more options, and made it very quick and easy to build a UI."
"Stitch has helped my organization achieve better data management, making it easier, as it helps my team access data faster and reduces errors."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping to manage webhooks easily and workflows easily, and it has improved collaboration so that other clients can use webhooks."
"During our three to six-month evaluation pilot, automating our student enrollment sync with Tray.io delivered proper operational improvements."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization as it provides a trusted way to organize data results and share them throughout the company at once."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by reducing the amount of redundant tasks that our team performs by approximately 80%, and the numbers are quite significant with the workflows alone, as we are working towards creating and utilizing AI within these workflows as well."
"Tray.io has positively impacted my organization by helping us keep our internal database and this third-party service in sync, and it has really helped us automate a lot of that work because it is fairly straightforward to maintain and develop."
 

Cons

"The conversion to Figma is not effective."
"I would advise that you should not use Stitch if you are going to build a big number of screens or a heavy UI application with complex designs because it is not ready for that kind of work."
"Until then, it does get a little bit complicated when we have Qlik and Stitch components together."
"The designs that Stitch produces sometimes cannot really be used for final launch, but I understand Stitch was designed just for rapid prototyping and for teams to get from the point where they just have an idea to having an actual product."
"To be frank enough, I will say right now that since we are not using it, they are too expensive."
"My experience with customer support for Stitch has been very bad."
"Stitch should definitely provide more extractors than it does now and provide the ability for teams to integrate their own extractors."
"If there is something Stitch can improve, I would say it is the pricing structure."
"There is not much that can be improved in Tray.io. It is a good tool, but debug can be improved further and the solutions can be improved further."
"Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved."
"I have found that the error management in my main use case with Tray.io is not as effective as we would prefer."
"As our product got more complex, we needed to add more and more complexity to Tray.io in terms of our setup, and that is when the benefits of it being no-code or low-code started to pale in comparison to the cost of making everything slightly more complicated."
"One way Tray.io could be improved, especially for people coming in with no real coding experience, is with more comprehensive error messages."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
900,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Construction Company
19%
Outsourcing Company
14%
Healthcare Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Construction Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
15%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business6
Midsize Enterprise3
Large Enterprise4
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Large Enterprise3
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Talend Stitch?
During the processing of transformation, sometimes we used to bring up our own logic, like removing duplicates from the data if I have checked two or three keys. Rather than picking up the one whic...
What is your primary use case for Talend Stitch?
All of these things totally depend upon your business logic. If you want to remove duplicates or you want to implement some kind of format for postal addresses, like keeping pin codes in this forma...
What advice do you have for others considering Talend Stitch?
I have moved my role, actually. So basically right now I am into management mostly. But my projects which I am handling right now do have those things that have been handled. Greenplum I have used ...
What needs improvement with Tray.io?
Tray.io is definitely a highly powerful tool, but there are three main areas that I feel could be improved. There is a steep learning curve in user accessibility; the builder is highly developer-ce...
What is your primary use case for Tray.io?
We used and evaluated Tray.io for approximately three to six months during a proof of concept evaluation phase. During this period, our engineering and operation teams utilized the platform to buil...
What advice do you have for others considering Tray.io?
I give Tray.io an eight out of ten rating mostly because of how it is developer-centric and lacks a low-code platform and the pricing. The reduction in manual data tasks had a direct positive impac...
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

Talend Stitch ETL
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AB InBev, Accolade, Accor, AstraZeneca, Beachbody
Copper, DigitalOcean, Udemy, AdRoll, FICO, Outreach
Find out what your peers are saying about Stitch vs. Tray.io and other solutions. Updated: June 2026.
900,196 professionals have used our research since 2012.