No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Striim vs WSO2 Enterprise Integrator comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Striim
Ranking in Data Integration
46th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Data Integration (27th), Streaming Analytics (23rd)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator
Ranking in Data Integration
29th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (6th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2026, in the Data Integration category, the mindshare of Striim is 0.6%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is 1.0%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Integration Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
WSO2 Enterprise Integrator1.0%
Striim0.6%
Other98.4%
Data Integration
 

Featured Reviews

Eren Çağatay - PeerSpot reviewer
Data Engineer Intern at Gtech
Real-time file streaming has transformed data workflows and makes project delivery more efficient
Striim could improve in making the initial setup and configuration a bit more user-friendly, as the learning curve is steep at first for someone new to the tool. Better documentation will definitely help; some parts are difficult to follow for a beginner, so clearer guides or more examples would make onboarding easier.
AC
Technical director at Cremete
Effective data transformation and integration in complex environments with high functionality
Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your hand on this environment is a very demanding task. This is the real problem. The problem is not about the product, but about the complexity to manage, to configure, to decide what to do. I have some experience using SAP R/3. It seems to me something similar. When you have to configure a situation with a client, especially for a client not in an industrial sector, but in a service sector, it is quite usual that you are in trouble for some reason. This is always the story that I found in the implementations I have done. Maybe there are only three or four big problems, in some other cases there are more than that, but this is the situation usually. For WSO2 Enterprise Integrator, not the same, but I must say it is quite often there is a need to put together some pieces and make it work in a coordinated way.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Striim is capable of absorbing a large number of transactions, and the difference between the two databases is always less than a second, which demonstrates efficiency and highlights the variety of sources and targets I have used."
"The real-time data streaming capability is the best feature of Striim, as it made it easy to move data from files into other systems quickly and reliably."
"The real-time data streaming capability is the best feature of Striim, as it made it easy to move data from files into other systems quickly and reliably."
"It has improved our time management because development is quicker."
"I like the user-friendly system and development of the service-oriented architecture."
"It's a consolidated product. It works and it does its job pretty well."
"The productivity is the most valuable feature. It is very easy to write remediations."
"The solution's technical support is very knowledgeable."
"The drag-and-drop features for connectors are very valuable."
"In my opinion, the most valuable aspect of this solution is its extensive range of adaptors and connectors. This feature holds significant importance and provides great value to users."
"The solution's customer service is good."
 

Cons

"Striim could improve in making the initial setup and configuration a bit more user-friendly, as the learning curve is steep at first for someone new to the tool."
"I think Striim could be improved with better pricing and enhanced documentation."
"Striim could improve in making the initial setup and configuration a bit more user-friendly, as the learning curve is steep at first for someone new to the tool."
"For simpler tasks or simpler use cases, we avoid using WSO2 Enterprise Integrator because it is quite complex."
"Most of the issues we run into with the WSO2 Enterprise Integrator deal with customizations."
"There are a lot of security settings that when you apply you have to re-apply again every time you modify a setting. It is something that really needs to be enhanced."
"WSO2 libraries are not mature enough. For example, if you want to integrate with Kafka using its Kafka library, it often has many bugs."
"They should introduce better pricing for small companies."
"We had some challenges with the installation of this solution."
"The administration side is complex and could use significant improvements to enhance the solution's functionality."
"The scalability is not strong. If you want to scale it you have to install multiple servers."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The solution costs about 20,000 or 30,000 euros per year, per instance."
"I rate the product price a six on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."
"The open-source, unsupported version is available free of charge."
"It is a low-cost solution."
"The cost is better than IBM Cloud Pak."
"The pricing of WSO2 Enterprise Integrator for enterprise subscriptions can be considered expensive, especially from the perspective of someone who prefers open-source software."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.
907,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Healthcare Company
15%
Construction Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Retailer
9%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Outsourcing Company
9%
Construction Company
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business8
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise11
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Striim?
My experience with the pricing, implementation cost, and licensing of Striim is that it is somewhat expensive.
What needs improvement with Striim?
I think Striim could be improved with better pricing and enhanced documentation.
What is your primary use case for Striim?
I use Striim to perform change data capture from relational databases to non-relational databases in my organization. I implement CDC with Striim by transferring data from Oracle Database to MongoD...
What needs improvement with WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?
Something that could be improved in WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is that the problem is not a lack of capability or functionalities. The problem is that it is a very complex environment. To put your ...
What is your primary use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?
A typical use case for WSO2 Enterprise Integrator is when I am in an interoperability environment with healthcare facilities and I have to put together a lot of applications that share some HL7 mes...
What advice do you have for others considering WSO2 Enterprise Integrator?
For simpler tasks or simpler use cases, we avoid using WSO2 Enterprise Integrator because it is quite complex. So it is easier to manage some more simple solutions than that. WSO2 Enterprise Integr...
 

Also Known As

Striim Platform
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Sky, UPS, MACY'S, EMAAR, HSBC
West
Find out what your peers are saying about Informatica, Microsoft, Palantir and others in Data Integration. Updated: July 2026.
907,372 professionals have used our research since 2012.