Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Snyk AppRisk vs Sweet Security comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on May 7, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

SentinelOne Singularity Clo...
Sponsored
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
6th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.9
Number of Reviews
114
Ranking in other categories
Cloud and Data Center Security (4th), Container Security (3rd), Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (4th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (3rd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (3rd), Compliance Management (2nd)
Snyk AppRisk
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
68th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (78th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (43rd), GRC (85th), Application Security Posture Management (ASPM) (12th)
Sweet Security
Ranking in Vulnerability Management
73rd
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Workload Protection Platforms (CWPP) (34th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (43rd), Cloud-Native Application Protection Platforms (CNAPP) (29th), Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) (38th), Cloud Detection and Response (CDR) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2025, in the Vulnerability Management category, the mindshare of SentinelOne Singularity Cloud Security is 1.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Snyk AppRisk is 0.3%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sweet Security is 0.2%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Vulnerability Management
 

Featured Reviews

Andrew W - PeerSpot reviewer
Tells us about vulnerabilities as well as their impact and helps to focus on real issues
Looking at all the different pieces, it has got everything we need. Some of the pieces we do not even use. For example, we do not have Kubernetes Security. We are not running any K8 clusters, so it is good for us. Overall, we find the solution to be fantastic. There can be additional education components. This may not be truly fair to them because of what the product is going for, but it would be great to see additional education for compliance. It is not a criticism of the tool per se, but anything to help non-development resources understand some of the complexities of the cloud is always appreciated. Any additional educational resources are always helpful for security teams, especially those without a development background.
Use Snyk AppRisk?
Share your opinion
Use Sweet Security?
Share your opinion
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Vulnerability Management solutions are best for your needs.
852,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
15%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Retailer
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about PingSafe?
The dashboard gives me an overview of all the things happening in the product, making it one of the tool's best featu...
What needs improvement with PingSafe?
The price is on the higher side. The dashboard can be more detailed.
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Also Known As

PingSafe
Enso Security, Helios
No data available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Wiz, Qualys, Tenable and others in Vulnerability Management. Updated: May 2025.
852,764 professionals have used our research since 2012.