

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
Now, we can work and share live documents; they can see the real-time changes being made, and we can even get on a meeting and work on the document at the same time.
With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, the collaboration, versioning control, and data accuracy improved, allowing us to finish the project in just one month or two instead of six.
With Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, they can collaborate in a very fast way.
There has been a return on investment from using Sharepoint 2016 Standard, as documentation approval workflows, change request processes, HR onboarding and offboarding flows, document routing based on metadata, and notifications and escalations have all improved with Sharepoint being implemented.
You can stop paying for other tools if you are willing to move to Sharepoint 2016 Standard.
Time saved productivity metrics means tasks that used to take a week now get resolved in one to two days with Sharepoint 2016 Standard, saving approximately five to seven days per request.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is in an end-of-support era, so there is very limited customer support available.
The customer support for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very responsive and proactive.
They got good results and everything is working, so it turned out okay.
The customer support for Sharepoint 2016 Standard is very active and responsive.
The response was quite swift, the engineers were quite knowledgeable, and they were able to resolve my issue in the shortest possible time.
When I contacted the support team, they helped me recover the file in a very efficient and supportive way.
We did not have any problem scaling Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7.
For large organizations, I would recommend Sharepoint Online or cloud-based solutions as better options.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is very scalable because it has continued to handle my organization's growth efficiently.
Zero downtime patching means adding servers or patching can be done without weekend outages.
The security and reliability enhancements make it very scalable.
Sharepoint 2016 Standard is highly scalable.
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 is stable in my experience.
I have not seen any crashes or downtimes so far.
I have not found any bugs myself, so for me, Sharepoint 2016 Standard is pretty stable.
I use it on a daily basis for most of my tasks, and I have not faced any stability issues.
I would like to see more of AI's analytics and observations come into Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, particularly regarding user interface, speed, or integration with other tools.
Sometimes it would have been quicker to search outside of Microsoft or Sharepoint and use Google, or even find a YouTube video that explained how to do something, which should not be necessary for a Microsoft product that we pay for.
We can definitely improve the search feature, which should crawl every page and every list to retrieve data.
Implementing minimum roles plus zero downtime patching, which is built into the 2016 setup, means we should configure minimum roles correctly so web front end, application server, and search servers can do only their job and speed up farms.
I would assess the integration of Microsoft Office apps within Sharepoint 2016 Standard for document management as lacking.
Whatever use case I have been involved in or whatever additional things that I needed, I have always been able to find those on Sharepoint 2016 Standard.
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 has been transparent
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing for Sharepoint 2016 Standard has been that it offers very competitive price plans, which are good for business.
Only choose 2016 if you have a clear upgrade hybrid plan before 2026 and do not start any new 2016 projects unless they are planned for fewer than two years of use with air-gapped security.
The workflows that connect Outlook, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7, and OneDrive among others allow me to manage multiple actions for all these tools.
The workflow feature specifically helped my team by not only improving efficiency but also impacting our costs, as it saved on printer, paper, and ink consumption while allowing managers to approve requests from anywhere at any time.
I am not sure how we would share some of these resources as easily with another solution, especially being able to control who can access what at different levels and who can edit which files, who can upload, and who can see different things.
Sharepoint 2016 Standard has positively impacted my organization by providing a very good data repository and organization of various amounts of information that is stored in these Sharepoint sites.
Sharepoint 2016 Standard has role-based access control, which secures our enterprise data effectively.
It integrates well with other Microsoft products through Office 365.
| Product | Mindshare (%) |
|---|---|
| Sharepoint 2016 Standard | 0.4% |
| Sharepoint 2010 on Windows server 2012r2-24x7 | 0.4% |
| Other | 99.2% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 3 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 1 |
| Large Enterprise | 16 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 6 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 2 |
| Large Enterprise | 9 |
Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 features robust security, seamless Microsoft integration, and workflow automation, enhancing collaboration, file sharing, and document management.
Organizations leverage Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 for online data storage and efficient business process automation. It offers improved communication and secure file sharing through real-time collaboration and mobile access. While the platform increases productivity with version history and access control, areas such as offline functionality and performance enhancement need focus. The outdated user experience and limited browser support are aspects requiring attention.
What are the key features of Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7?In specific industries, Sharepoint 2010 on Windows Server 2012r2-24x7 is utilized for secure document management and collaboration. Manufacturing companies use it for managing complex workflows and storing files securely. In healthcare, it supports data consistency and real-time collaboration to ensure quality patient care.
SharePoint 2016 Standard offers a versatile platform for seamless collaboration and document management. With its role-based access, secure file sharing, and AI adaptability, it helps organizations enhance productivity and support robust business processes, despite its integration challenges.
SharePoint 2016 Standard is designed to integrate with Microsoft tools, providing an intuitive interface and granular permission management. It simplifies collaboration by reducing manual tasks, enhancing security with role-based access, and supporting AI integration for improved efficiency. Users can manage documents efficiently with version control and high-capacity data storage. Despite its strengths, SharePoint faces challenges like limited integration with Microsoft Office apps, SAP connectivity issues, and navigation difficulties, impacting productivity. Suggested improvements include enhancing file movement, loading times, third-party integrations, and modernizing its design.
What are the key features of SharePoint 2016 Standard?Industries use SharePoint 2016 Standard for intensive document management, team collaboration, and centralizing communication. Organizations benefit from its real-time collaboration features, serving as a knowledge repository accessible from anywhere, ensuring secure remote work and effective communication.
We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.