No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Sencha Complete vs Temenos Quantum comparison

Why PeerSpot?
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Sencha Complete
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
10th
Average Rating
10.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Temenos Quantum
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
3rd
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Development Platforms (6th), Rapid Application Development Software (29th), Low-Code Development Platforms (27th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of Sencha Complete is 3.3%, up from 1.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 8.1%, up from 7.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Temenos Quantum8.1%
Sencha Complete3.3%
Other88.6%
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

it_user1149 - PeerSpot reviewer
Developer at a tech company with 51-200 employees
Best mobile application framework for an enterprise application containing a large number of views with lots of components, but a little sluggish performance on android platforms.
* Scrolling needs some serious tweaking, specifically for android. There is a huge time lag while scrolling through a list. * Lacks full access to native hardware, but if you want access to more hardware then you will have to combine your sencha application with PhoneGap. * No support for blackberry. The sencha sdk beta tools provide support for native packaging for only android and iOS (even their team says they haven't tested much on blackberry). * It's still in its developing phase and may take a while for it to fully mature. * Animations run slower. * No support for windows phone as well.
Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Software Engineer (Kony-Temenos | Android) at Xpert Digital
Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability
There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I would highly recommend sencha mobile application frameworks for either cross platform or standalone web apps."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"The most valuable features of Temenos Quantum are user-friendliness and customizability."
"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."
"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."
"The initial setup of Temenos Quantum was easy."
"Overall, Kony is the best mobile platform on Gartner, where it has been at the top for the last seven years."
"It helps us focus on continually improving our technology and keeping up with the latest developments."
"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."
 

Cons

"Scrolling needs some serious tweaking, specifically for android. There is a huge time lag while scrolling through a list."
"The product needs more native features."
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"In terms of technical support, I think that they are lacking."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."
"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."
"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"It is expensive solution."
"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."
"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."
"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."
"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
22%
Outsourcing Company
12%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Construction Company
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise10
 

Also Known As

No data available
KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Citi, McKesson, Alcoa, Dow Jones & Do, DirecTV, Merrill Lynch, Experian, NATO, Lockheed Martin
Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
Find out what your peers are saying about Google, SAP, Temenos and others in Mobile App Platforms. Updated: September 2026.
914,394 professionals have used our research since 2012.