Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

IBM MobileFirst vs Temenos Quantum comparison

IBM and Temenos are both solutions in the Mobile App Platforms category. IBM is ranked #8, while Temenos is ranked #3 with an average rating of 6.9. IBM holds a 4.3% mindshare in MAP, compared to Temenos’s 6.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of IBM users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 81% of Temenos users who would recommend it.
IBM MobileFirst
Read 3 IBM MobileFirst reviews
  • 132 Views
  • 38 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Temenos Quantum
Read 15 Temenos Quantum reviews
  • 120 Views
  • 61 Comparison Views
81% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

IBM MobileFirst and Temenos Quantum are products in the enterprise mobile application development category. Temenos Quantum seems to have the upper hand due to its versatile toolkit and easier deployment.

Features: IBM MobileFirst provides strong security protocols, an analytics platform, and a robust coding environment. Temenos Quantum offers seamless cross-platform development, a no-code option, and a user-friendly experience with a broader toolkit for diverse platforms.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: IBM MobileFirst requires a complex deployment process and higher technical expertise but provides comprehensive support. Temenos Quantum features swift deployment, intuitive interfaces, and reliable customer support, making it more accessible for quick market entry.

Pricing and ROI: IBM MobileFirst involves a higher upfront investment with long-term value through extensive capabilities and customization. Temenos Quantum has a more approachable pricing model, with manageable setup costs and a quicker return on investment due to its efficient deployment and scalable solutions.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 856,873 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

IBM MobileFirst
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
8th
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
13th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Temenos Quantum
Ranking in Mobile App Platforms
3rd
Ranking in Mobile Development Platforms
8th
Average Rating
7.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
15
Ranking in other categories
Rapid Application Development Software (21st), Low-Code Development Platforms (14th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Mobile App Platforms category, the mindshare of IBM MobileFirst is 4.3%, up from 1.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Temenos Quantum is 6.8%, up from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Mobile App Platforms
 

Featured Reviews

MT
Streamlines development of hybrid applications, and has ability to integrate device-native code
It was a cakewalk for us to develop mobile apps for three different platforms using IBM MobileFirst. Since it was a consumer application built for large-scale events, it was very crucial for us to manage application compatibility with all sort of devices. With MobielFirst, we could actually achieve this with very little trouble. With help of this product, we have been able to develop mobile applications without having complete knowledge of each mobile OS's native programming. App development, delivery, and code management have been very efficient using this product.
Read full review
Zain Omer - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a secure tool for building applications, there is a need to improve its stability
There is a lot of room for improvement in Temenos Quantum. Temenos Quantum is not quite stable yet. Improvements can be made to make Temenos Quantum stable. Improvements are needed in the solution, considering how my company needs to raise a lot of tickets with the technical support team of Temenos for some basic issues every time. There are some features in Temenos Quantum that I want to be stabilized by Temenos, just like in Android Studio and Xcode. Building an application using Temenos Quantum is not difficult, but my company needs to seek some support for the solution all the time.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"I like Its capability for developing hybrid applications, with an ability to integrate device-native code as well"
"With help of this product, we have been able to develop mobile applications without having complete knowledge of each mobile OS's native programming technology. App development, delivery, and code management have been very efficient using this product."
"IBM MobileFirst has one of the most feature-rich admin panels."
"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."
"Its greatest advantage lies in its exceptional security and robustness."
"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."
"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."
"The most valuable features of Temenos Quantum are user-friendliness and customizability."
"It is a single platform that can cater to mobile and web development requirements, making it convenient for businesses looking to transition into the digital space."
"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms.​"
"The most valuable feature is usability. You can develop components inside it and reuse them in different parts of your application, wherever needed. You can replicate them. There's also a Quantum Fabric on the back end, which provides a middle layer between your database and the third-party systems you need to integrate. It also provides the integration to handle all sorts of exceptions and timeouts on the Fabric. This makes it easy to troubleshoot errors coming from third-party APIs."
More Temenos Quantum pros
 

Cons

"There are issues with push notifications, especially for Windows mobile apps. JSONStore also crashes abruptly at times."
"I would like to see improved support for native device functions."
"The security and the interface technology could be better in Temenos Quantum. Additionally, a module that can display all the activities that have been done in the system would be helpful."
"When developing our application, we also encountered certain issues related to delays and time-consuming builds."
"The technology of the solution needs an update. It is deficient in terms of connectivity."
"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."
"There is definitely room for improvement, especially in the areas of AI, AR, and DR for mobile and web applications"
"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."
"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."
"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"
More Temenos Quantum cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Cost depends upon various factors. Size of the overall application and product usage matter a lot. For an enterprise-grade application, this certainly comes out as an economical solution. However, for small-scale applications, it can turn out to be on the higher side."
"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"
"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."
"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."
"It is expensive solution."
"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Platforms solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Financial Services Firm
37%
Computer Software Company
16%
Government
5%
Educational Organization
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about Temenos Quantum?
Comparing other solutions with Temenos Quantum, the later is less mature and presents several issues. Implementing Temenos Quantum has been challenging, resembling a nightmare compared to the smoot...
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Temenos Quantum?
It is expensive solution.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Temenos Quantum?
The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum Logo
OutSystems vs Temenos Quantum
Compared 33% of the time
Mendix vs Temenos Quantum Logo
Mendix vs Temenos Quantum
Compared 25% of the time
Microsoft Power Apps vs Temenos Quantum Logo
Microsoft Power Apps vs Temenos Quantum
Compared 23% of the time
Microsoft Azure App Service vs Temenos Quantum Logo
Microsoft Azure App Service vs Temenos Quantum
Compared 20% of the time
More Temenos Quantum Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Mobile App Platforms
May 2025
IBM MobileFirst reportDownload IBM MobileFirst product report
Buyer's Guide
Temenos Quantum
May 2025
Temenos Quantum reportDownload Temenos Quantum product report
 

Also Known As

MobileFirst, Worklight
KonyOne, Kony, Kony Quantum
 

Overview

IBM Worklight helps organizations extend their business to mobile devices.
IBM

Temenos Quantum is a Multiexperience Development Platform (MXDP) that combines ease-of-use and speed of low-code productivity with deep enterprise capabilities for both consumer grade digital experiences across multiple touchpoints and robust backend services for identity, integration, orchestration, business process automation, and business rules management.

Temenos
 

Sample Customers

UniCredit Business Integrated Solutions, Gruppo Unipol, Raymond James Financial, Toshiba GCS, CST, ABK-Systeme GmbH, BNP Paribas
Partners FCU, Banco Bolivariano, PSECU, CFG Bank, Commerce Bank
Buyer's Guide
IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum
June 2025
Free Report: IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum and other solutions. Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our IBM MobileFirst vs. Temenos Quantum report.
See our list of best Mobile App Platforms vendors and best Mobile Development Platforms vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Platforms reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.