SecureLink vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform comparison

The compared Imprivata and Zscaler solutions aren't in the same category. Imprivata is ranked #33 in EIV , and holds a 0.7% mindshare in the category. Zscaler is ranked #1 in ZaaS , with an average rating of 8.6, and holds a 17.4% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Imprivata users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of Zscaler users who would recommend it.

SecureLink

Read 1 SecureLink review

703 Views
647 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Read 64 Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform reviews

13,158 Views
6,316 Comparison Views

98% willing to recommend

SecureLink

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SecureLink and Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, OpenVPN, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN.

To learn more, read our detailed Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Report (Updated: August 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

August 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 867,676 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SecureLink

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN (33rd)

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange...

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Loss Prevention (DLP) (2nd), Cloud Access Security Brokers (CASB) (5th), Application Control (4th), ZTNA as a Service (1st), Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) (1st), Remote Browser Isolation (RBI) (1st)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Network Security Systems solutions, they serve different purposes. SecureLink is designed for Enterprise Infrastructure VPN and holds a mindshare of 0.7%, up 0.4% compared to last year.
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform, on the other hand, focuses on ZTNA as a Service, holds 17.4% mindshare, down 21.4% since last year.

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
SecureLink	0.7%
OpenVPN Access Server Enterprise	15.3%
Fortinet FortiClient	10.5%
Other	73.5%

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

ZTNA as a Service Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform	17.4%
Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks	14.0%
Cato SASE Cloud Platform	12.6%
Other	56.0%

ZTNA as a Service

Featured Reviews

Frederic Soulier

Deputy Head of IT at a legal firm with 501-1,000 employees

Efficient technical support with good synchronization features, but it needs better security

We would like to be to secure access to all of the servers for all of the internal workers and engineers. We would like to have tools that provide us with security for our servers. I would like to see an improved repository to better see the users. We have a new project that requires a lot of security we will not continue with SecureLink. The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough.

Read full review

Sumit Bhanwala

architect at Tata Consultancy

Cloud-based platform simplifies device and data center management

I find it to be good. The solution is cloud-based with the latest inspection engines, which I find to be amazing. We are less dependent on data centers and device management, which reduces our efforts significantly. It improves our device management, data center management, and updating devices. We need fewer engineers for this management, and it reduces time and efforts for data center management, device upgrades, and IT support.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The most valuable feature is synchronizing the limited access for partners or sub-contractors."

"The solution is cloud-based with the latest inspection engines, which I find to be amazing."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to establish connectivity for remote users and remote endpoints. It offers a high level of granularity compared to typical VPNs, which also encapsulate a lot of I/O."

"The most valuable features of Zscaler SASE include web filtering, application control, and the private access configuration."

"You can close your data protection gaps with Zscaler. You can quickly find all the classified, sensitive data across the cloud."

"It has been helpful in maintaining our infrastructure. The granular level control it offers allows us to set application policies per application for each user."

"The UI is easy to use."

"The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are its ability to integrate with multiple IDPs and application segmentation."

"Has a good zero trust feature."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pros

Cons

"The security features offered in SecureLink are not enough."

"Occasionally, issues arise in the LogStack by a third party, particularly for government websites accessed by numerous users."

"The product is not reliable."

"Having a Zscaler-specific device could streamline this process and provide a more consistent user experience across diverse branches."

"Conflicts arise if you do not have the same management teams on the product."

"While Zscaler supports client-initiated connections, it does not support server-initiated connections. This is a feature that Zscaler may consider adding in the future."

"In the next release, I would like to see RE2 Regex supported."

"I can't speak to any missing features."

"On the improvement side, when we bypass certain internet traffic types, it's currently recommended to have a one-click option, but audio and video aren't always supported. Thus, we need to bypass that kind of traffic. So, it is an area of improvement."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are not happy with the recent increase in the price."

"The product is a little more expensive than other tools."

"It has been relatively reasonable for what it does. Some of the additional license costs based on the advanced next-generation firewall functions are quite high, and they should have certain features ready and available as a baseline rather than having to purchase additional licenses for it. Overall, the cost seems reasonable."

"The pricing is expensive and on the higher end. Honestly, in my opinion, it is not worth the price."

"My company is a Zscaler Private Access partner, so the customers pay for the license fees."

"The price is competitive."

"In the long run, cloud services are not inherently costly."

"The licensing model for Zscaler Cloud DLP allows you to only buy what you need. You don't need to buy it as a whole, so it's good."

"Zscaler Cloud DLP is moderately priced. We pay around 2 million rupees per year."

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Infrastructure VPN solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Healthcare Company

31%

Performing Arts

Non Profit

Media Company

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	41

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the better solution - Prisma Access or Zscaler Private Access?

We looked into Prisma Access before choosing Zscaler Private Access (ZPA). Palo Alto’s Prisma Access is a secure access service edge (SASE) designed to deliver network security in a cloud-deliver...

See all answers

What do you like most about Zscaler SASE?

The most valuable features of Zscaler Private Access are reliability, scalability, and availability.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Zscaler SASE?

The solution needs to improve a lot of aspects.

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenVPN Access Server vs SecureLink

Compared 47% of the time

Microsoft Azure VPN Gateway vs SecureLink

Compared 21% of the time

Citrix Gateway vs SecureLink

Compared 17% of the time

Cisco Secure Client (including AnyConnect) vs SecureLink

Compared 15% of the time

More SecureLink Competitors

Cato SASE Cloud Platform vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 11% of the time

Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Prisma Access by Palo Alto Networks vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 7% of the time

FortiSASE vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 6% of the time

Netskope Private Access vs Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

Compared 4% of the time

More Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

August 2025

Download SecureLink product report

Buyer's Guide

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform

August 2025

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform report

Download Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform product report

Also Known As

No data available

Zscaler SASE, Zscaler DLP, Zscaler CASB, Zscaler CSPM, Zscaler Browser Isolation, Zscaler Posture Control

Overview

SecureLink is the leader in managing secure third-party remote access and remote support for enterprise organizations and technology vendors. More than 30,000 world-class companies across multiple highly regulated industries, including healthcare, retail, government, financial, legal and gaming, rely on SecureLink’s purpose-built platform to securely control network access, ensure industry compliance, manage audit trails, decrease time to resolution, and reduce liability.

The company was founded in 2003 and is based in Austin, Texas with a second office in Costa Rica.

Imprivata

Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform acts as a VPN alternative for secure remote access, cloud protection, and zero-trust strategies. It enables secure data transmission, supports remote work, and enhances compliance through a cloud-based architecture, offering improved performance and simplified management.

Designed for organizations seeking secure application access and robust data protection, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform delivers a comprehensive solution through seamless VPN connectivity, data loss prevention, and SSL inspection. Its cloud integration ensures scalability and reliability, while its interface provides intuitive management. Companies benefit from automatic secure access, minimizing constant authentication needs, and safeguarding sensitive data. The platform allows easy deployment and integration with diverse identity providers, granting granular control for access and application segmentation. Despite powerful capabilities, enhancements are needed in speed, bandwidth, and legacy support, with users noting interface and configuration challenges.

What are the key features of Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange Platform?

Seamless VPN Connectivity: Provides automatic secure access without repetitive authentication.
Strong Security Measures: Offers DLP and SSL inspection for data protection.
Cloud Integration: Ensures scalability and performance optimization.
Granular Access Control: Manages access with application-specific segmentation.

What benefits should companies look for in reviews when evaluating this platform?

Performance: Enhanced connectivity and reduced latency.
Data Protection: Comprehensive DLP and encryption capabilities.
Scalability: Efficient handling of growing organizational demands.
Ease of Deployment: Quick setup and integration with IDPs.

In specific industries, Zscaler Zero Trust Exchange has been implemented to enhance security protocols in fields like finance and healthcare. By prioritizing data protection and compliance, it assists companies in safely managing sensitive information and meeting regulatory requirements. Organizations leverage its features to ensure secure operations across remote and cloud environments, adapting to industry-specific needs with customizable access and security controls.

Zscaler

Sample Customers

NISC, Sotera Wireless, InterSystems, Allscripts, Cerner, Allscripts

Siemens, AutoNation, GE, NOV

Buyer's Guide

Enterprise Infrastructure VPN

August 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet, OpenVPN, Cisco and others in Enterprise Infrastructure VPN. Updated: August 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

867,676 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all Enterprise Infrastructure VPN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.