ScienceLogic vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager comparison

ScienceLogic and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Network Monitoring Software category. ScienceLogic is ranked #14 with an average rating of 8.7, while SolarWinds is ranked #95. ScienceLogic holds a 1.3% mindshare in NMS, compared to SolarWinds’s 0.4% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of ScienceLogic users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.

ScienceLogic

Read 46 ScienceLogic reviews

5,321 Views
2,820 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Read 2 SolarWinds Network Automation Manager reviews

1,132 Views
657 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

ScienceLogic

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

ScienceLogic and SolarWinds Network Automation Manager compete in the network management domain. SolarWinds appears to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive functionality, appealing to those valuing extensive capabilities over price considerations.

Features: ScienceLogic emphasizes versatile monitoring, AI-based analytics for predictive alerts, and quick incident resolution. SolarWinds offers an integrated suite with robust automation, extensive visibility across network infrastructures, and detailed network management capabilities.

Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could benefit from enhancing integration with third-party tools, improving user interface design, and expanding reporting functionalities. SolarWinds may need to address scalability issues, refine its user interface for complex tasks, and enhance customization options for specific industry needs.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is known for flexible deployment options suitable for diverse IT environments and strong support teams. SolarWinds delivers a streamlined deployment process with efficient support services, enabling faster implementation and adaptability.

Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic presents a cost-effective solution with the potential for high ROI through efficient network monitoring and lower total cost of ownership. SolarWinds requires a higher initial investment, justified by its extensive feature set, often resulting in significant ROI for businesses prioritizing advanced capabilities. Despite the earlier cost, SolarWinds’ features might offer better overall value.

To learn more, read our detailed ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 885,444 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

ScienceLogic

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

14th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Event Monitoring (7th), Unified Communications Monitoring (1st), Server Monitoring (10th), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (14th), IT Operations Analytics (4th), Cloud Monitoring Software (14th), AIOps (9th)

SolarWinds Network Automati...

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

95th

Average Rating

5.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Network Automation (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of ScienceLogic is 1.3%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is 0.4%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
ScienceLogic	1.3%
SolarWinds Network Automation Manager	0.4%
Other	98.3%

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

Pallagani Siva Koteswararao

Assistant Consultant at Tata Consultancy

Comprehensive monitoring streamlines operations with room for user support enhancement

I am interested in improving the flexibility of ScienceLogic's user interface, configuration, and customization. I am particularly keen on learning about issues raised by the ScienceLogic support team. Whenever we encounter difficulties, I raise vendor cases and am eager to deepen my understanding of those cases. Additionally, I want to learn more about ScienceLogic's dashboards, which display crucial metrics about collectors, their health, and devices aligned to them. The dashboard should be more detailed. Regarding improvements to ScienceLogic's technical support, my last company was IBM in India, and I worked on IBM MQ monitoring until my last day. I engaged with the LogicMonitor support team for MQ-level incidents, but these issues remained unresolved even after 10 to 15 days. On my last working day, I assisted with one such vendor case, and I am unsure if that issue was ever resolved. ScienceLogic's technical support should respond more efficiently in terms of time. During my time working on MQ-level cases, including a power pack upgrade that did not fix the issues faced, I provided all necessary steps with the help of the middleware team. However, there were still gaps that needed addressing.

Read full review

Giulio Valeri

Owner at SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS SRL

Threat detection failures, poor technical support, and expensive

We use the solution to manage all of our customer's systems. We monitor and decide if everything is okay and if not, we do changes when needed. For example, if there is a need to change the antivirus software we can automate the process and install the new one. There are scripts within the software…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is simple."

"Science Logic provides distributed and all-in-one concept in monitoring, you can easily customize the features in this product."

"The customer service and support has been the best of any vendor I have had experience dealing with in my professional history."

"It has good monitoring capabilities across cloud environments, data centers, and hybrid environments."

"It has given us comprehensive monitoring across all platforms."

"ScienceLogic's custom enablement, which I can achieve as a Python developer, is unique."

"The integration of ScienceLogic with our existing IT ecosystems has significantly benefited our organization, as all alerts now directly go to IBM Netcool and then to the ITSM tool, ServiceNow."

"ScienceLogic was good at proactively identifying problems and could turn a 45-minute outage into a 20-minute outage or even catch early warning signs and solve issues in advance."

More ScienceLogic pros

"The solution offers so many great resources, it makes them a powerhouse in the market."

"The installation is easy."

"We are satisfied with the stability of the solution."

Cons

"The reporting module needs work."

"One of the main areas for improvement would be the reporting section of ScienceLogic."

"The overall product rating is six out of ten. It's suitable for specific customers, although slower in implementation and offering tougher ROI compared to some."

"ScienceLogic does not have application monitoring; we definitely need something integrated within ScienceLogic to monitor applications so that we don't have to rely on monitoring tools to monitor other applications."

"Error information doesn’t have a good information if something goes wrong while doing a device discovery (I tried this a while back- couldn’t be more specific)."

"Addressing duplicate IPs: There is the ability to edit the DB and fix this, but adding some logic to understand them would be a plus."

"ScienceLogic should provide detailed documents to customer as the current documents are not sufficient."

"It doesn't have the complete application-level topology. It could have service topology and business service monitoring. I would like to see how business service monitoring will function with agent-based installation, and how flexible and business-oriented it is for service modeling and service infrastructure. I have a lot of experience in using business service monitoring, service topology, and service hierarchy functionalities in similar products from BMC and Micro Focus (OpenView), and I want to see how these functionalities will look like in ScienceLogic."

More ScienceLogic cons

"We now use ConnectWise because while using SolarWinds we were attacked by ransomware. The solution did not protect us."

"The price could be a bit lower."

"We did not like SolarWinds because it was not able to communicate between UPSA and our accounting system. They should have better integration."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Decide what you want to monitor and only monitor those items. Absorb other elements as you grow."

"Pricing between the two is quiet large therefore you can save some money if you don't require to collect all info on each device."

"The license of ScienceLogic is based on how many endpoints are used. The number of monitoring points you want to have."

"The pricing model for ScienceLogic could improve."

"I'm not the best person to discuss pricing, but what I do know is that it's a use-and-go structure. You use this much storage and pay this much for it. That's how it is. Every time, we continue to add a large amount of data to the environment."

"The solution is license-based. It's between $8 and $15, depending on what you need from the product."

"It comes with the OS built in, so no need to purchase an OS license or DB license."

"My company has an enterprise-level contract with ScienceLogic, so it is available to my organization at a good price."

More ScienceLogic pricing and cost advice

"The price of SolarWinds Network Automation Manager is fair. However, it is more expensive than ConnectWise."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

No data available

Government

13%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

10%

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	13
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	24

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about ScienceLogic?

The tool is quite easy to deploy, and it offers very good support.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for ScienceLogic?

ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.

See all answers

What needs improvement with ScienceLogic?

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

LogicMonitor vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

Datadog vs ScienceLogic

Compared 6% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs ScienceLogic

Compared 5% of the time

Nagios XI vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

Dynatrace vs ScienceLogic

Compared 4% of the time

More ScienceLogic Competitors

NetBrain vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 32% of the time

Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Nexus Dashboard Fabric Controller (Formerly DCNM) vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 10% of the time

WhatsUp Gold vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 7% of the time

Cisco DNA Center vs SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Compared 7% of the time

More SolarWinds Network Automation Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic

March 2026

Download ScienceLogic product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Automation

March 2026

SolarWinds Network Automation Manager report

Download SolarWinds Network Automation Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

SolarWinds NAM

Overview

ScienceLogic excels in customizable dashboards, seamless integrations, and real-time data analysis, supporting diverse IT environments with multi-tenant capabilities.

ScienceLogic provides robust infrastructure and network monitoring, catering to cloud, applications, and server environments. It supports hybrid setups, integrating with CMDB and ticketing systems while automating incident management. ScienceLogic's PowerPacks eliminate visibility gaps and its adaptable nature supports modern and legacy systems. Offering agentless monitoring, it ensures efficient operations with scalable infrastructure support and detailed reporting. However, the interface complexity and need for professional support can present usability challenges. Enhancements in reporting, application coverage, API support, and customization are desirable for improved user experience.

What are ScienceLogic's most important features?

Customizable Dashboards: Tailor views for precise monitoring across different environments.
PowerPacks: Extensive device integrations reduce visibility gaps.
Real-time Data Analysis: Enables quick decision-making with up-to-date insights.
Seamless Integration: Compatible with multiple platforms to unify IT systems.
Adaptive Infrastructure: Supports both modern and legacy systems with ease.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Operational Efficiency: Automates event management and simplifies monitoring tasks.
Scalable Support: Grows with the organizational needs, accommodating larger infrastructures.
Comprehensive Reports: Provides complete oversight for informed strategic planning.
Enhanced Adaptability: Unifies diverse technological environments efficiently.

ScienceLogic is often implemented across industries requiring detailed attention to infrastructure and network monitoring. It finds utility in managing hybrid environments, integrating seamlessly with essential systems like CMDB and ticketing platforms. Its scalability and adaptability are valued in unifying complex, diverse environments under one monitoring platform.

ScienceLogic

Scale environments from 1,000 to tens of thousands of nodes with comprehensive performance, traffic, WAN, and switch port monitoring, automated change and configuration management, and IP address management in an integrated network automation software solution.

SolarWinds

Sample Customers

Kellogg Company, Booz Allen, Cisco, Red Bull, Fidelus, Telstra, Comcast, CSC, Peak 10, HughesNet, Hosting, Datapipe, US Army, Equinix, Rite Aid, Carbonite, Sybase, Carpathia, AT&T, ePlus, Dimension Data, Virtustream, Boeing, Honeywell

Maalem Financing Company, School City of Hammond

Buyer's Guide

ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

March 2026

Free Report: ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

885,444 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds Network Automation Manager report.

See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.

We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.