SAP Process Orchestration vs Tungsten RPA comparison

The compared SAP and Tungsten Automation solutions aren't in the same category. SAP is ranked #1 in BBM , with an average rating of 8.5, and holds a 11.5% mindshare in the category. Tungsten Automation is ranked #10 in RPA , with an average rating of 7.6, and holds a 2.3% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Tungsten Automation users who would recommend it.

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 30 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

3,540 Views
1,483 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

Tungsten RPA

Read 25 Tungsten RPA reviews

2,492 Views
1,849 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

Tungsten RPA

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between SAP Process Orchestration and Tungsten RPA based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Process Orchestration vs. Tungsten RPA Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. Tungsten RPA

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 813,418 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

SAP Process Orchestration

Average Rating

8.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (1st)

Tungsten RPA

Average Rating

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) (10th)

Mindshare comparison

SAP Process Orchestration and Tungsten RPA aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. SAP Process Orchestration is designed for Business-to-Business Middleware and holds a mindshare of 11.5%, down 16.2% compared to last year.
Tungsten RPA, on the other hand, focuses on Robotic Process Automation (RPA), holds 2.3% mindshare, up 2.2% since last year.

Business-to-Business Middleware

Robotic Process Automation (RPA)

Featured Reviews

Vishal Khare

IT manager at Electrolux Home Products

Jan 29, 2024

A tool that can be useful for small integrations and large integrations

It is a pretty scalable solution. You can use the tool for small integrations and large integrations. From a use case perspective, all the people, around 3,000 employees, use the tool in my organization since some form of the product's integration capabilities are used in the company and have their own requirements of interfaces. There are no plans to increase the use of the solution in my company. My company has a couple of managers and developers to do the coding and mapping in SAP PI/PO. If I talk about the APAC region, I have almost eight to ten people who take care of the tool's complete technical area.

Read full review

Jamil Milhem

Project Manager-Senior RPA Specialist at DEWA

Feb 2, 2024

Automates browsing tasks without needing a server connection

My use case for the product is in the finance domain. You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it. The product should improve desktop automation, which is hard to configure. It needs to have…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."

"The initial setup is easy...The solution gets automatically connected. The deployment takes six months. I rate its setup phase a ten out of ten."

"The product has good technical support but you usually will not need it because it is quite stable."

"The performance of data processing has increased."

"SAP Process Orchestration has all the features that are necessary."

"It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs."

"The solution's technical support is good."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

"The most valuable features are workflow and process automation."

"The OCR was quite stable and flexible."

"The product provided all the security controls that we asked them."

"It is stable and scalable."

"Kofax handles UIs via the browser well. If it's not possible, they have other features like modeling screen scrapes, etc."

"The product provides end-to-end solutions for different business problems."

"The best part of Kofax is that they have a whole concept. It's one product, but also has extra elements that can be integrated."

"Kofax RPA's best feature is its high success percentage in picking up information from documents, especially where the DPI is really low."

More Tungsten RPA pros

Cons

"Its administration management feature needs to be simpler to use."

"Process Orchestration doesn't provide authentication for data sent to us, meaning we have to rely on client certificate-based or basic authentication."

"SAP Process Orchestration could improve from an API standpoint. This is not an API management tool, which is one of its drawbacks. However, SAP has released an SAP Cloud Platform Integration which has all of the features, such as API management along with process integration to replace what they had previously."

"I think the big improvement required in the tool stems from the fact that the whole issue around it is that we have some downtime failures during upgrades and patching."

"The older version of the solution will no longer be supported."

"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."

"Process Orchestration needs to provide secure connectivity as no one has any data information."

"The cloud capability features need improvement."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

"The solution needs to be scalable."

"The scalability has room for improvement."

"The interface could be better from a usability standpoint."

"The product needs more AI capabilities."

"RPA technology is constantly changing, and sometimes Kofax lags behind."

"There is really nothing special about the capabilities of this product."

"I'd like to see a recording function and a more simple interface."

"This product has room for improvement in support of aviation. The interface could be improved in the next release."

More Tungsten RPA cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market."

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"It is a very expensive solution. We only pay for the license."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"It's not an expensive solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

"The solution’s license is not expensive."

"Kofax RPA's licensing costs are yearly and expensive."

"I give the price of the solution a six out of ten."

"Price is not a problem, because they are a competitor and we have a special rate."

"Its pricing is reasonable given the product capabilities. Kofax has a wide range of products, and it can sometimes be confusing to understand which capabilities come with which product set. One of the key facets that we've been looking into recently is cognitive document recognition that was a core pile of some of their other technologies such as Kofax transformation modules (KTM)."

"The pricing model for automation solutions like Automation Anywhere, UiPath, and Microsoft Power Platform is subscription-based, where costs are calculated based on factors such as the number of hours used and the scale of automation required.......With Kofax, you purchase a license upfront, and that's all you need. You can create as many automation workflows as you require without additional costs for individual use cases."

"The cost depends on the number of licenses and the number of RPAs."

"Kofax's prices are pretty reasonable."

More Tungsten RPA pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

17%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Energy/Utilities Company

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

13%

Manufacturing Company

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SAP Process Orchestration?

It provides essential features such as continuous monitoring of all interfaces are crucial for our needs.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The product is not a low-priced solution, but I can say that it is competitively priced in the market. There is a need to make yearly payments towards the licensing charges associated with the prod...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

Some configurations can be a little tricky. The consulting team had to spend a long time checking SAP's community forums and documentation to achieve some goals. The tool could release some new fun...

See all answers

What do you like most about Kofax RPA?

You can automate browsing tasks without needing a server connection. The platform provides its browser, allowing you to run anything inside it.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Kofax RPA?

Previously, Tungsten RPA offered perpetual licenses, but now it has a subscription-based model for more flexibility, similar to the Microsoft developer platform.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Kofax RPA?

We've faced a few challenges with Tungsten RPA. One issue I recall was with sending emails that needed multiple attachments. At the time, the feature only allowed attaching one file at a time. We d...

See all answers

Comparisons

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 17% of the time

SAP Data Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 16% of the time

webMethods.io vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 12% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 10% of the time

IBM App Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 5% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

UiPath vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 38% of the time

Microsoft Power Automate vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 12% of the time

Blue Prism vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 11% of the time

Automation Anywhere (AA) vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 7% of the time

Tungsten TotalAgility vs Tungsten RPA

Compared 5% of the time

More Tungsten RPA Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

September 2024

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

Tungsten RPA

September 2024

Download Tungsten RPA product report

Also Known As

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

Kofax RPA, Kofax Kapow, Kapow

Learn More

SAP

Tungsten Automation

Overview

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration facilitates the integration of business processes that span different departments, organizations, or companies. SAP PI is based on general standards so as to enable 3rd-party systems to be integrated. At the center of SAP PI is an XML-based communication that uses HTTP (Hyper Text Transfer Protocol). Irrespective of the scenario used, the application-specific contents are transferred in messages in user-defined XML eXtensible Markup Language) from the sender to the receiver either via the Integration Server, or directly between the systems involved. SAP PI can be installed in different ways: Dual usage type installation: Based on both AS ABAP and AS Java. and Advanced Adapter Engine Extended (AEX): Based on AS Java only.

Tungsten RPA offers an efficient solution for streamlining business processes through Robotic Process Automation (RPA), which utilizes software "bots" to automate tasks like data entry and form filling. With Tungsten RPA, organizations can enjoy increased efficiency as repetitive tasks are automated, freeing up human resources for more strategic work. Moreover, the software ensures improved accuracy by performing tasks consistently and error-free, leading to reduced costs and enhanced compliance with regulations. Key features include a low-code design environment for easy workflow creation, intelligent document processing for handling unstructured data, automated process discovery, and flexible deployment options suitable for on-premises, cloud, or hybrid environments. Tungsten RPA presents a comprehensive solution for optimizing operational efficiency and driving business success through automation.

Sample Customers

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Aetna, BNP Paribas, Citi, Goldman Sachs, HSBC, ING, Aviva, Humana, Willis, Merck, University Hospitals, CardinalHealth, American Red Cross, Alegri, Capita

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. Tungsten RPA

October 2024

Free Report: SAP Process Orchestration vs. Tungsten RPA

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Process Orchestration vs. Tungsten RPA and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

813,418 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. Tungsten RPA report.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.