SAP Process Orchestration vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite comparison

Why PeerSpot?

SAP and Seeburger are both solutions in the Business-to-Business Middleware category. SAP is ranked #9 with an average rating of 7.3, while Seeburger is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.0. SAP holds a 3.6% mindshare in BBM, compared to Seeburger’s 9.6% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of SAP users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 95% of Seeburger users who would recommend it.

SAP Process Orchestration

Read 35 SAP Process Orchestration reviews

4,660 Views
1,864 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Read 39 SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite reviews

10,055 Views
3,620 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

SAP Process Orchestration

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 27, 2025

SEEBURGER BIS and SAP Process Orchestration compete in the integration and EDI market. SEEBURGER BIS seems to have the upper hand in flexibility, handling of large data volumes, and seamless integration capabilities, particularly with SAP systems, giving it a competitive edge.

Features: SEEBURGER BIS provides comprehensive flexibility, strong EDI capabilities, and powerful mapping tools, making it adaptable to different protocols and platforms. It is also designed for high uptime with features like Active-Active configurations. SAP Process Orchestration focuses on seamless SAP integration, and robust monitoring tools, although it lacks the flexibility found in SEEBURGER BIS.

Room for Improvement: SEEBURGER BIS could improve its monitoring and error-tracking features and simplify its integration model. It also receives frequent updates, which users find onerous. SAP Process Orchestration needs better cloud compatibility, a simplified architecture, and more proactive support for new industry trends.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SEEBURGER BIS is primarily on-premises with some public cloud options, receiving mixed reviews on support. Initial deployments are standard, but improvements are needed in ticket handling and consistency. SAP Process Orchestration offers on-premises, private, and hybrid cloud options and relies on standardized processes, necessitating enhanced support for global deployments as the demand for cloud capabilities increases.

Pricing and ROI: SEEBURGER BIS offers competitive pricing, yet it may be seen as high due to its extensive features. The ROI is realized in automation and efficiency gains, but there's room for cost improvements, especially with modular pricing. SAP Process Orchestration has a one-time licensing fee but pricing for additional modules can add up. It offers significant ROI through operational efficiencies and cost savings, especially for users with substantial SAP landscapes.

To learn more, read our detailed SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,028 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SAP Process Orchestration

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

9th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SEEBURGER Business Integrat...

Ranking in Business-to-Business Middleware

1st

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Managed File Transfer (MFT) (12th), API Management (26th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (15th)

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Business-to-Business Middleware category, the mindshare of SAP Process Orchestration is 3.6%, down from 5.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is 9.6%, up from 8.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business-to-Business Middleware Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite	9.6%
SAP Process Orchestration	3.6%
Other	86.8%

Business-to-Business Middleware

Featured Reviews

Vasanth Kumar Sabaapathi

Senior Lead Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Simplified integrations bring flexibility and efficiency to diverse industries through comprehensive features and robust support

SAP is already trying to make improvements for SAP Process Orchestration by releasing updates every quarter, including patches and modules, and from a security standpoint, while it's a tightly coupled tool, they are introducing a lot of enhancements aligned with current market trends. There are standard contents readily available for starting integrations, which suit around 90% of every industry across verticals including pharma, manufacturing, and employee data central with SuccessFactors integration. Regarding functionality-wise improvements in SAP Process Orchestration, they are now incorporating the Salesforce system. Previously, we needed to rely on a third-party adapter for integration within SAP, but now they are building their own adapters to connect with Salesforce. Additionally, there are options like data connectors using Ariba coming up with SAP Process Orchestration. There's much more to explore, especially as they release new patches, enhancements, and adapters each quarter.

Read full review

Shaik Saifuddin

Senior Software Engineer at HCLTech

Exceptional support and reliability drive optimal data flow and integration

The features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite that I found most valuable are related to entity flow. We can find the entity flow to be very useful so we can grab the flow accordingly. There is no disturbance in the connections, and it is very clear to check the connection flow with applicable queues. When comparing to other applications, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is the easiest way to understand the application. I have also worked on the cloud services where SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is moving to cloud. I have worked on cloud services where the mapping part is in the cloud itself, along with the connection setup.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The standard adapter with EBA abilities is the most valuable feature. It has good process integration."

"The most valuable features of SAP Process Orchestration are the standard APIs that we can use."

"SAP is now one of the leaders in integration."

"The monitoring is one of the greatest features in Process Orchestration because it is user-friendly and easy for somebody who is not experienced."

"The solution is working well; we don't have any operational problems with it at all."

"The support from SAP Process Orchestration is very helpful."

"It is strategically focused to forecast a global integration platform for our business."

"The solution makes it easy to solve integration problems."

More SAP Process Orchestration pros

"The ease of integration of the SEEBURGER product into SAP was pretty seamless. There wasn't any trouble, there weren't any complexities."

"The stability is world-class. It is as good as any of the other options out there. They have addressed hiccups quickly, professionally, and with an excellent response."

"SEEBURGER BIS can reconcile documentation, like our accounts payable and statements within the system. If you are manually doing it, then it is really time consuming with a lot of errors. Whereas, SEEBURGER BIS allows for a lot of basic level programming within the documentation, filtering, and sorting out VLOOKUP. It lets us get two database tables from two different systems, then merge them based on the logic that we provide. So, it is a very helpful product."

"Among the most valuable features are the EDI translator and a lot of the components which enable creating compliance sets. Having something standard out-of-the-box and being able to use that has been a huge benefit for us."

"It used to take half an hour to move one file from one location to another. Now, it takes 10 minutes."

"In our landscape, we have a lot of AS/400s or iSeries and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) has a file service listener that allows data to seamlessly be transferred between the SEEBURGER solution and the AS/400."

"The solution is flexible when it comes to adding integrations, it is much easier to use than the other tools we have to move the files, and across the board, we can move files in a short amount of time compared to our other existing tools."

"SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS) provides significant value in handling such things in an automated way."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pros

Cons

"I feel that support is an area that needs improvement. They need to improve the response time and address the customer's issues as soon as possible."

"We encounter challenges while connecting to MQTT and MQDD adapters."

"The main issue is that these products, which evolved from Process Integration to SAP Process Orchestration, will be replaced and will have no support in the future."

"It would be beneficial to enhance the ease of implementing new projects and improve overall stability in our implementations."

"The solution is not very scalable because it is at the end of its life."

"The cloud capability features need improvement."

"We have experienced latency and reliability issues when using large amounts of data."

"The solution could improve by making it more user-friendly by limiting the code required. We have to add some code in some cases where we need complex logic or some other functions. If this was able to be done in a more simplified manner then it would save a lot of effort and time."

More SAP Process Orchestration cons

"The cost models have room for improvement. There are different licensing models between Europe and the USA, which is something that I don't understand."

"Their traditional model is a vendor flow. We are looking to do a customer-based flow, which which require significant development from SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). We are working with them to do this using their WebEDI. It is a brand new area for them, but it could be an option in the future."

"We wanted to use API. We were told that in 6.52 we could use API management. Later on, we found that API management wasn't that completely integrated into the 6.52 solution, and if you wanted to have the whole API suite you might have to go to 6.7, the latest one."

"The initial setup is not the straightforward. It took couple of months for us to set up."

"Some of the functionality for retriggering documents, where you have to step through a termination process and then retrigger it, versus just being able to restart or retrigger more easily, is a bit challenging, depending on the scenario."

"In the BIS, if I want to have some API functionalities, that is a separate tool. The integration between the API tool and the BIS is not that straightforward. If they were to combine these tools and give us one suite, that would be helpful. Today I have a lot of partners onboard. I have something like 50,000 partners doing API transactions. If I want to introduce a new tool for API management, I have to do a lot of workarounds. But if it were integrated well within the existing suite, it could be straightforward for me."

"I don't think the scalability of the solution is that great because they have tied the solution to their named nodes and it does not allow scalability like some of the cloud products allow."

"That is the component that we definitely have the biggest issue with."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Normally, you will have to choose CPU-based licensing...I rate the tool price a five out of ten."

"Looking at market conditions, vendors nowadays are giving products at very low price levels. However, SAP Process Orchestration have not yet reduced their prices. The prices could be reduced a lot to stay competitive."

"The license is a one-time payment, and additional costs are only incurred on the infrastructure side since it's an on-premise solution."

"My company deals with different pricing models of the product, according to which we don't pay for the solution directly, but we do pay for the maintenance part."

"The cost of SAP products is quite high but the quality is really good."

"There are fees in addition to the licensing."

"The fee for maintenance is costly."

"It's not an expensive solution."

More SAP Process Orchestration pricing and cost advice

"We pay for a maximum number of setups, then we pay per customer map, and we pay maintenance on each one of those. BIS provides the flexibility to pay as you grow. The price of each customer map is €200 and the hourly rate for maintenance is fairly reasonable."

"Sometimes it seems a little pricey, especially when some of the stuff is available through freeware, like SFTP communications... It costs a lot more money to buy this stuff from SEEBURGER but I think it's worth it in the long run."

"All the new adapters are individually priced, which is good. You don't buy the whole system and then if you don't use it, you don't use it. You only buy the stuff you want..."

"I have had exposure to other big vendors over the years and would have to say the pricing is pretty typical. They all fall into a common pricing range, at least the bigger vendors: Axway, IBM Sterling, Globalscape, and SEEBURGER. They all fall into that mid-tier pricing. So, SEEBURGER is commensurate with other large integration vendors operating in this space. Maybe it is lower than some of the really high-end ones. You can get some of these high-end transactional messaging integration systems, like TIBCO, that tend to be kind of on a higher echelon of pricing. I would say SEEBURGER is more mid-level."

"Price and licensing are comparable to other systems. It's well-priced and simple. It's not user-based or anything. It's just per seat, per system. So, it's pretty straight forward. Because it's per system, one system is enough. However, if you want to make it larger, then you can grow with it."

"The pricing seems to be competitive and the maintenance is standard."

"The way they have their licensing structure set up, they have a lot of different modules. For us, we did not really know if we were licensed for certain things or not. We had to reach out to them multiple times to tell them that we were looking for this or that capability. We had to buy licenses for different things at different points in time, not knowing that we could have it bundled initially."

"The cost-based model is slightly different now in SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite (BIS). They changed the licensing, based on adapters and other things. In the old style of licensing, the whole suite was one license..."

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business-to-Business Middleware solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Outsourcing Company

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	8
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	26

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	4
Large Enterprise	38

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP Process Orchestration?

The price for SAP Process Orchestration is a little high when compared to market trends, which is just how the business is. I would rate it an eight.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP Process Orchestration?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP Process Orchestration?

The main use case for SAP Process Orchestration is that it's an SAP proprietary tool which integrates within SAP and outside SAP. It's the most familiar middleware tool which is used for integrations.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding the pricing of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, I would rate it as 7 out of 10.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Regarding areas of improvement for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, the cloud functionality needs enhancement. The cloud interface is currently too cluttered, especially when creating new tran...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

I have worked around 3.5 years with SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite ( /products/seeburger-business-integration-suite-reviews ). Currently, I am working with WebMethods. Previously, I worked fo...

See all answers

Comparisons

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 7% of the time

Infor ION vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Graph Data Connect vs SAP Process Orchestration

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Process Orchestration Competitors

IBM B2B Integrator vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

SAP Integration Suite vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

IBM webMethods Hybrid Integration vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Compared 4% of the time

More SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration

October 2026

Download SAP Process Orchestration product report

Buyer's Guide

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

October 2026

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report

Download SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite product report

Also Known As

SAP NetWeaver Process Integration, NetWeaver Process Integration

SEEBURGER BIS

Overview

SAP Process Orchestration offers centralized monitoring, extensive integration capabilities, and flexible connectivity, supporting smooth interactions between SAP and non-SAP systems. Its robust tools facilitate B2B operations and enhance automation, providing enhanced workflow efficiency across platforms.

SAP Process Orchestration serves as a key middleware choice for enterprises needing integration solutions. It supports e-commerce, e-invoicing, and seamless data exchange on a global scale. With capabilities in security and transaction handling, the suite facilitates AI and B2B integrations while connecting ERP systems to third-party solutions. Highly beneficial prepackaged content, Java Message Service, and comprehensive documentation make it a preferred choice. Users value its adaptability and ease of use. However, updates to its interface, cloud integration, handling large data volumes, and scalability are sought after to improve Java reliance along with technical support and cost efficiency enhancements.

What features define SAP Process Orchestration?

Centralized Monitoring: Simplifies oversight across workflows.
Adapter Variety: Includes REST and SOAP for diverse connectivity.
Robust Integration: Ensures seamless SAP and non-SAP connectivity.
B2B Support: Enhances business-to-business operations.
Prepackaged Content: Offers automation tools and process efficiency.
Java Message Service: Supports reliable communication.

What benefits and ROI can users expect?

Flexibility: Easily adapts to changing business needs.
Enhanced Automation: Streamlines processes, increasing efficiency.
Comprehensive Connectivity: Facilitates integration with various systems and platforms.
Documentation: Provides detailed guidance for usage.

SAP Process Orchestration is widely implemented in sectors that require robust integration capabilities. It supports industries ranging from e-commerce to financial services, managing secure data exchanges and fostering AI integration. Its versatility allows use in cloud and on-premises applications, promoting enhanced connectivity and optimized workflows.

SAP

SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite is a versatile platform supporting multiple integration patterns with rich adapters and easy Java coding, known for fault tolerance and seamless SAP integration.

SEEBURGER offers extensive EDI capabilities and adaptability across protocols. The platform provides tools for entity flow, data mapping, message tracking, and high-volume performance. Appreciated for reliability, scalability, and automation, it enables independent adaptation, maintaining stability in efficient data communication. However, handling large datasets can be challenging. Users desire improved cloud and API integration, enhanced error handling, and more accessible training resources. Frequent updates and new features are valued, but customization can be slow, and support experiences are inconsistent.

What are the most important features of SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Flexible Integration: Supports multiple integration patterns and protocols.
Rich Adapter Suite: Extensive adapter options available.
Seamless SAP Integration: Enables smooth SAP processes.
EDI Capabilities: Comprehensive electronic data interchange support.
Fault Tolerance: Maintains stability and reliable operation.
Entity Flow Tools: Provides detailed data mapping and message tracking.

What benefits may organizations look for in reviews when evaluating SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite?

Reliability: Ensures consistent performance across platforms.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data and organizational needs.
Automation: Reduces need for programming expertise.
Protocol Adaptability: Supports diverse communication standards.

In industries, SEEBURGER is used for EDI transactions, partner communication, and data integration. Organizations benefit from scripting, process monitoring, certifications, and secure transfers like AS2 and SFTP, facilitating data conversion and internal connections. Implemented on-premises and in the cloud, SEEBURGER adapts to custom business processes.

Seeburger

Sample Customers

Lenovo, Dansk Supermarked A/S, Ego Pharmaceuticals Pty. Ltd, Kaeser Kompressoren

Altis, Autoliv, Cebi, Cofresco, MoneyGram International, Samsonite Europe, VSP Global, BMW Group, OSRAM, Magna, Lavazza

Buyer's Guide

SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

November 2026

Free Report: SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,028 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SAP Process Orchestration vs. SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite report.

See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.

We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.