Rivery vs webMethods.io comparison

Rivery and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Rivery is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.9. Rivery holds a 0.9% mindshare in CDI, compared to IBM’s 5.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Rivery users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Rivery

Read 2 Rivery reviews

755 Views
219 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

8,870 Views
1,331 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Rivery

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

webMethods.io and Rivery are both competitors in the integration and data management industry. webMethods.io is often preferred for pricing and support, whereas Rivery is regarded as having a slight advantage due to its comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher price point for detailed data orchestration.

Features:webMethods.io provides seamless integration capabilities with a variety of pre-built connectors and flexible workflow automation. Rivery stands out in data pipeline management and offers versatile data integration with advanced ETL features that allow users to perform complex transformations without writing code. Rivery's focus is heavily on data integration, contrasting with webMethods.io's emphasis on broader connectivity options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:webMethods.io offers a straightforward deployment with proactive customer support aiming to simplify the setup process. Rivery's cloud-based deployment is complemented by robust technical support known for being informative and quick, ensuring that users achieve operational readiness through comprehensive guidance.

Pricing and ROI:webMethods.io provides a competitive setup cost and showcases a strong return on investment due to its efficient operations and reduced total cost of ownership. Rivery, although initially more expensive, can be beneficial for organizations emphasizing detailed data management, delivering long-term ROI with its analytics and integration potential. This reflects a choice between lower upfront investment and greater analytical returns over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Rivery vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: September 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Rivery vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 869,760 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rivery

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

20th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (36th), Migration Tools (4th), Cloud Migration (14th)

webMethods.io

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

10th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (11th), API Management (11th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (7th)

Mindshare comparison

As of October 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Rivery is 0.9%, up from 0.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 5.2%, up from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
webMethods.io	5.2%
Rivery	0.9%
Other	93.9%

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2335923

Senior Operations Analyst at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides users with an initial setup phase, which is fairly simple to manage

I don't know what could be improved in terms of what my company was used to previously or after moving over to Rivery. I have not had much experience with platforms other than Rivery. For me, Rivalry was a way to step up from what we used. To be honest, I am not really sure what improvements could be made in Rivery. Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better. I am not aware if there are additional packages for smaller organizations, but if there are no packages available, then maybe that would be a good way to introduce something new in the tool.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The solution's most valuable features are that it is quick to connect and simple to use."

"Connects to many APIs in the market and new ones are being added all the time."

"WebMethods.io is a powerful tool, but it requires skilled people who can fully utilize its potential."

"This solution has given us a competitive advantage because we have better automation and insight."

"One [of the most valuable features] is the webMethods Designer. That helps our developers develop on their own. It's very intuitive for design. It helps our developers to speed the development of services for the integrations."

"It has a good integration server, designer, and a very good API portal."

"Oracle's self-service capabilities, of which we make extensive use, is the most valuable feature."

"It’s fairly easy to view, move, and mange access across different components. Different component types are categorized and can be viewed in a web based administration console."

"The core product can be used not only for automatic file transfers between applications, but also as an Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)."

"Our use case is for integration factory for SAP. It is mostly for SAP integration."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Lineage and an impact analysis or logic dependency are lacking."

"Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better."

"They should develop clear visibility for the onboarding."

"webMethods Integration Server needs to add more adapters."

"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."

"This product is for larger companies. Compared to TIBCO I think webMethods is better in terms of ease of use and support."

"webMethods.io Integration's installation is complex. It should also improve integration and connectors."

"The price should be reduced to make it more affordable."

"The improvement needed is related to the model's position. As of now, it seems to be more of a conceptual idea rather than a widely implemented solution. For how long"

"It is difficult to maintain."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten."

"The solution’s pricing is too high."

"webMethods.io Integration's pricing is high and has yearly subscription costs."

"It is an expensive tool. I rate the product price a nine out of ten, where ten means it is very expensive."

"Some who consider this solution often avoid it due to its high price."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them."

"It is worth the cost."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Manufacturing Company

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	23
Midsize Enterprise	11
Large Enterprise	63

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rivery?

The tool's price can be a little steep for a small organization. I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rivery?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rivery?

My company has started to use the Rivery extract data from Hive. It is like a project management sort of program, and we started to use Rivery to get the data from there over into Mavenlink, so we ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

dbt vs Rivery

Compared 31% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Rivery

Compared 28% of the time

Matillion Data Productivity Cloud vs Rivery

Compared 18% of the time

Alteryx Designer vs Rivery

Compared 12% of the time

Upsolver vs Rivery

Compared 11% of the time

More Rivery Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 9% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 5% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

September 2025

Download Rivery product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

September 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Rivery is a serverless, SaaS DataOps platform that empowers companies of all sizes around the world to consolidate, orchestrate, and manage internal and external data sources with ease and efficiency.

By offering comprehensive data solutions and partnering with complementary technology providers, including Google, Snowflake, Tableau, and Looker, Rivery enables data-driven companies to build the perfect ecosystems for all their data processes.

Rivery

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Rivery vs. webMethods.io

September 2025

Free Report: Rivery vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Rivery vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: September 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

869,760 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Rivery vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.