Rivery vs webMethods.io comparison

Rivery and IBM are both solutions in the Cloud Data Integration category. Rivery is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while IBM is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.1. Rivery holds a 0.7% mindshare in CDI, compared to IBM’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Rivery users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 94% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Rivery

Read 2 Rivery reviews

574 Views
172 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

webMethods.io

Read 93 webMethods.io reviews

9,897 Views
1,188 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Rivery

webMethods.io

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 3, 2024

webMethods.io and Rivery are both competitors in the integration and data management industry. webMethods.io is often preferred for pricing and support, whereas Rivery is regarded as having a slight advantage due to its comprehensive feature set, justifying its higher price point for detailed data orchestration.

Features:webMethods.io provides seamless integration capabilities with a variety of pre-built connectors and flexible workflow automation. Rivery stands out in data pipeline management and offers versatile data integration with advanced ETL features that allow users to perform complex transformations without writing code. Rivery's focus is heavily on data integration, contrasting with webMethods.io's emphasis on broader connectivity options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:webMethods.io offers a straightforward deployment with proactive customer support aiming to simplify the setup process. Rivery's cloud-based deployment is complemented by robust technical support known for being informative and quick, ensuring that users achieve operational readiness through comprehensive guidance.

Pricing and ROI:webMethods.io provides a competitive setup cost and showcases a strong return on investment due to its efficient operations and reduced total cost of ownership. Rivery, although initially more expensive, can be beneficial for organizations emphasizing detailed data management, delivering long-term ROI with its analytics and integration potential. This reflects a choice between lower upfront investment and greater analytical returns over time.

To learn more, read our detailed Rivery vs. webMethods.io Report (Updated: July 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Rivery vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 861,524 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Rivery

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

19th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Integration (35th), Migration Tools (4th), Cloud Migration (14th)

webMethods.io

Ranking in Cloud Data Integration

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business-to-Business Middleware (3rd), Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) (3rd), Managed File Transfer (MFT) (9th), API Management (9th), Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of July 2025, in the Cloud Data Integration category, the mindshare of Rivery is 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of webMethods.io is 5.0%, up from 3.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Cloud Data Integration

Featured Reviews

reviewer2335923

Senior Operations Analyst at a computer software company with 201-500 employees

Provides users with an initial setup phase, which is fairly simple to manage

I don't know what could be improved in terms of what my company was used to previously or after moving over to Rivery. I have not had much experience with platforms other than Rivery. For me, Rivalry was a way to step up from what we used. To be honest, I am not really sure what improvements could be made in Rivery. Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better. I am not aware if there are additional packages for smaller organizations, but if there are no packages available, then maybe that would be a good way to introduce something new in the tool.

Read full review

MohanPrasad

Senior Consultant at Brillio

Smooth integration and enhanced deployment with high licensing cost

webMethods.io was used to integrate APIs through the webMethods.io platform, trigger database events, and connect backend APIs through a Java backend. It was used extensively for integration purposes in my organization Integration became smoother, troubleshooting was easier, and deployment and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Connects to many APIs in the market and new ones are being added all the time."

"The solution's most valuable features are that it is quick to connect and simple to use."

"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."

"Segregation of deployment for the environments is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"There's hardware, software and application integration, providing hosting flexibility."

"It is good for communicating between the systems and for publishing and subscribing. We can easily retrieve data. It is good in terms of troubleshooting and other things."

"It's a visual tool, so our transformations can be quickly implemented without a lot of fuss. The fact that we have an easy way to expose REST services is also very interesting. It offers the possibility to connect over GMS to synchronize message brokers."

"The most valuable feature of webMethods Integration Server is all the capabilities it provides. We leverage most of the features, that they have offered to us. Our vendor has made some additional features on top of the webMethods Integration Server and we use all the features together."

"Some of the key features are the integration platform, query mechanism, message handling within the bus, and the rules engine. We've had a really good experience with webMethods Integration Server."

"Application integrations are offered out-of-the-box, and that is extremely important to us. This is one of the main use cases that we have for it. It is about 60 to 70 percent of the workload in our application today."

More webMethods.io pros

Cons

"Pricing is a little steep for smaller organizations, I would say. The product's pricing model could be a little bit better."

"Lineage and an impact analysis or logic dependency are lacking."

"One area that needs improvement is the version upgrade process. Many customers I've worked with encounter challenges when transitioning from their current version, such as x or 9, to a newer version. The process is not smooth, and they must shift their entire website."

"There are things that could be improved with the webMethods API gateway. One thing is that it's too attached to the integration service and we'd like it to be a little bit more independent. We would like for them to separate operations so that it doesn't rely on the bulky integration server and so that it can be used everywhere."

"I have noticed that webMethods ActiveTransfer has had problems when handling large files. For example, when we receive (and perform operations on) files that are larger than about 16 MB, the software starts losing performance."

"The on-premises setup can be difficult."

"I would like the solution to provide bi-weekly updates."

"The price has room for improvement."

"The product's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."

"webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience."

More webMethods.io cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten."

"webMethods Trading Networks is a bit costly compared to others solutions."

"I am not involved in the licensing side of things."

"The product is expensive."

"Always plan five years ahead and don’t jeopardize the quality of your project by dropping items from the bill of materials."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"Sometimes we don't have a very clear idea what the licensing will entail at first, because it can be very customizable. On one hand, this can be a good thing, because it can be tailored to a specific customer's needs. But on the other hand it can also be an issue when some customer asks, "What's the cost?" and we can't yet give them an accurate answer."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"Pricing has to be negotiated with the local Software AG representative. SAG can always prepare an appropriate pricing model for every client."

More webMethods.io pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Integration solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

10%

Computer Software Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Rivery?

The tool's price can be a little steep for a small organization. I rate the tool's price as six out of ten if I consider the lowest price to be one and the highest price to be ten.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Rivery?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Rivery?

My company has started to use the Rivery extract data from Hive. It is like a project management sort of program, and we started to use Rivery to get the data from there over into Mavenlink, so we ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Built.io Flow?

The tool helps us to streamline data integration. Its BPM is very strong and powerful. The solution helps us manage digital transformation.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io is expensive. We have multiple components, and you need to pay for each of them.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Built.io Flow?

webMethods.io needs to incorporate ChatGPT to enhance user experience. It can offer a customized user experience.

See all answers

Comparisons

dbt vs Rivery

Compared 56% of the time

Azure Data Factory vs Rivery

Compared 44% of the time

More Rivery Competitors

IBM App Connect vs webMethods.io

Compared 8% of the time

Apigee vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Integration Bus vs webMethods.io

Compared 7% of the time

IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

Boomi iPaaS vs webMethods.io

Compared 4% of the time

More webMethods.io Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Data Integration

July 2025

Download Rivery product report

Buyer's Guide

webMethods.io

June 2025

Download webMethods.io product report

Also Known As

No data available

Built.io Flow, webMethods Integration Server, webMethods Trading Networks, webMethods ActiveTransfer, webMethods.io API

Overview

Rivery is a serverless, SaaS DataOps platform that empowers companies of all sizes around the world to consolidate, orchestrate, and manage internal and external data sources with ease and efficiency.

By offering comprehensive data solutions and partnering with complementary technology providers, including Google, Snowflake, Tableau, and Looker, Rivery enables data-driven companies to build the perfect ecosystems for all their data processes.

Rivery

webMethods.io Integration is a powerful integration platform as a service (iPaaS) that provides a combination of capabilities offered by ESBs, data integration systems, API management tools, and B2B gateways.

IBM

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Cisco, Agralogics, Dreamforce, Cables & Sensors, Sacramento Kings

Buyer's Guide

Rivery vs. webMethods.io

July 2025

Free Report: Rivery vs. webMethods.io

Find out what your peers are saying about Rivery vs. webMethods.io and other solutions. Updated: July 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

861,524 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Rivery vs. webMethods.io report.

See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors and best Cloud Data Integration vendors.

We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.