"We really like the scalability capabilities."
"The most valuable feature is performance monitoring."
"When it comes to the ability to scale up the product, this is suitable for small medium and large environments,"
"As we look to add more servers to our virtual environment and to understand the impact, the solution allows us to dig into the historical charts related to capacity planning."
"The product covers our needs for the basic care and feeding of servers, whether they are physical or virtual."
"The product is scalable."
"We have configured multiple alerts for our network devices, including routers and switches, so that we are notified if any interface goes down."
"The alerting and usage tracking notifications on disk space capacity, network and processor utilization."
"What I've found most valuable about the solution is that it's scalable."
"It is scalable."
"The solution is easy to install and it takes a couple of hours."
"The pricing is on the higher side of things. If they could lower it, that would be ideal."
"The AI features should be addressed in respect of the analysis and intelligence that must be supported and delivered in the tool to predigest the large amounts of data."
"Technical support needs to be more responsive."
"The solution could be more secure."
"The solution could improve in many areas, such as the marketing and description of the products, providing areas of improvement, cloud capabilities, and being able to be more streamlined with the current integration points with other applications."
"It would be good to have high security."
"Each model has different features, so clients need to purchase a separate model for SQL monitoring, database monitoring, network traffic analyzer, HTTP traffic, etc. So each feature they need is in a different model, but customers would prefer an all-in-one solution."
"The solution is not always good with new features, so it's take a long time."
"Technical support and releases are not particularly reliable."
"GUI needs improvement with a more graphical dashboard."
"SolarWinds needs to be improved such that it is on par with the leading products in the market."
Riverbed AppResponse is ranked 31st in Network Monitoring Software with 3 reviews while SolarWinds NPM is ranked 4th in Network Monitoring Software with 33 reviews. Riverbed AppResponse is rated 8.0, while SolarWinds NPM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Riverbed AppResponse writes "A scalable, and stable solution for one's capacity and debugging needs ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SolarWinds NPM writes "Make monitoring key performance factors in your enterprise customized and effective". Riverbed AppResponse is most compared with Dynatrace, AppDynamics, ThousandEyes, Wireshark and Splunk, whereas SolarWinds NPM is most compared with Zabbix, ManageEngine OpManager, PRTG Network Monitor, LogicMonitor and Nagios XI. See our Riverbed AppResponse vs. SolarWinds NPM report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.