Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Riskified vs Sift Digital Trust and Safety comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Riskified
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
10th
Average Rating
9.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Sift Digital Trust and Safety
Ranking in Fraud Detection and Prevention
24th
Average Rating
6.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2025, in the Fraud Detection and Prevention category, the mindshare of Riskified is 5.0%, up from 4.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Sift Digital Trust and Safety is 1.4%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Fraud Detection and Prevention
 

Featured Reviews

JJ
Integrates well, reasonably priced, and the technical support is helpful
The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function. I am satisfied with the documentation it provides. It integrates well with other products The user interface could be more intuitive. I have been familiar with Riskified for three years. Riskified is a…
reviewer1528731 - PeerSpot reviewer
Has a good 90-day POC but needs better machine learning and an updated user interface
We primarily use the solution for fraud chargeback, for securing the e-commerce store It's nice to be able to have access to a 90-day POC process. The user interface can be improved upon. The product needs to add more elements of machine learning. In a future release, I'd like to see a…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."
"The scoring mechanism is good."
"It's nice to be able to have access to a 90-day POC process."
 

Cons

"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."
"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."
"The user interface could be more intuitive."
"The user interface can be improved upon."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is determined by the requirements of each company."
Information not available
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Fraud Detection and Prevention solutions are best for your needs.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
18%
Retailer
15%
Computer Software Company
14%
University
6%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

ALDO, Macy's, Finish Line, Burlington, Burton Group, Sky-tours, GiftCards.com, Kirna Zabête
Doordash, Zoosk, Zirtue,Traveloka, Cozy
Find out what your peers are saying about ThreatMetrix, NICE, FICO and others in Fraud Detection and Prevention. Updated: May 2025.
856,873 professionals have used our research since 2012.