No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Revvity Signals Notebook vs Zaloni Data Platform comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Revvity Signals Notebook
Ranking in Data Preparation Tools
8th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
4.2
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
Visual Collaboration Platforms (5th)
Zaloni Data Platform
Ranking in Data Preparation Tools
13th
Average Rating
6.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Data Governance (40th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Data Preparation Tools category, the mindshare of Revvity Signals Notebook is 1.6%. The mindshare of Zaloni Data Platform is 3.7%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Data Preparation Tools Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Revvity Signals Notebook1.6%
Zaloni Data Platform3.7%
Other94.7%
Data Preparation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

PL
Process Development, Admin of the Notebook with 10,001+ employees
Digital lab collaboration has transformed how we centralize, share, and template experimental data
The best features Revvity Signals Notebook offers include the significant difference between it and paper notebooks. Now we can get all the data in one single computer from several users. We changed our mindset, and now we can compile all the data from several projects. This feature has helped my team and made our work easier because we can work in a more efficient manner, and we also save a lot of time because we can use templates for experiment creation, allowing us to avoid repetitive tasks. Revvity Signals Notebook has positively impacted my organization by allowing us to work together across several sites. My company has two sites in different cities, so now we can work together and compile all the data in one place. We can work on one experiment across different sites of the company. I am unable to share specific metrics or examples, but I can say that this cross-site collaboration is very useful for us.
reviewer1476264 - PeerSpot reviewer
Solution Architect at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Solid multi-ingestion tool but with poor exception handling
The major pain point with Zaloni is that their exception handling is not good. If any event happens (an event is when the job stops in the middle of the process), it doesn't tell you at which point it failed and it doesn't tell the operations team how they should take corrective actions unless you call Zaloni and then identify the issues. That is one issue. Another issue is that sometimes your jobs fail and if you run it a second time, it will go through. A third area it could be improved is the deployment process. When you want to deploy anything, it has a lot of manual processes. For example, you have to create your password in an encrypted format, and then you have to use a lot of manual deployment process. They should actually be building something else, like using Jenkins or automating their process. I have suggested to them that they have to improve their deployment process because they want everyone to run a manual deployment. It takes a lot of time, about half a day, for any single deployment. Then test it, then it might not work, and then reverting back is not easy because of the manual deployment process. I think in recent versions they added a lot of upgrades and additional features including a lot of integrations. Before it was just AWS, later they extended it to Azure. I'm not sure how they have extended it to GCP. It has some built-in features and a lot of improvements now because the UI and the features were not easy to navigate. Regarding showing the metrics, it's okay. I will say it's neither easy nor hard, there is whatever is required. Lastly, on the governance side, it's not very good. We faced some issues with the Ranger version. Ranger was an authentication tool on big data and Zaloni had some compatibility issues with the Ranger at that time. Later they said those are all going to be resolved, but at that time it had some issues. I'm not sure whether it was working with the Sentry or not.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"My company has a business relationship with this vendor as a distributor and reseller beyond being just a customer."
"From my experience over the last fifteen months, the most valuable feature of the Revvity Signals Notebook is its ease of use. Customers appreciate that updating templates is straightforward and everything is automatically saved. The UI is simple, making creating, sharing, and searching experiments easy. Different scientists can reference each other's experiments seamlessly. It is also swift compared to other vendor-built software, where you have to customize templates and write a lot of code. Revvity Signals Notebook excels in this aspect, making it smooth and efficient."
"The best features Revvity Signals Notebook offers include the significant difference between it and paper notebooks, as now we can get all the data in one single computer from several users, we changed our mindset, and now we can compile all the data from several projects."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to map data and write workflows with logic inside them."
"You can create a lot of ingestions based on the file levels or based on the time."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to map data and write workflows with logic inside them."
"The entire need was to ingest it into big data and Zaloni was the fastest product to test and implement into production."
 

Cons

"I trust the Signals support team regarding collaboration and data security, although I am not entirely certain about the security of Revvity."
"The workflow implementation is a pain point for customers because it relies on Spotfire with added plugins, which are not natively integrated. This makes execution slow and less effective in meeting all scientific workflow needs. Additionally, the support service is slow to respond and resolve issues. Even known problems take time due to a lack of astrong developer support team, making it a significant product drawback. They also need to work on other products like Workflow, which still need to achieve these compliance requirements. While Signals Notebook is good enough to meet all the necessary needs, other products like BitLocker still need improvements to become fully compliant enterprise products."
"Revvity Signals Notebook is not applicable to my main use case, as I typically do not use it for any specific purpose in my daily work."
"Technical support is in need of improvement."
"The major pain point with Zaloni is that their exception handling is not good."
"When we have gone to the support team because something is wrong with the product, I would say that it has not been easy for them to sort things out and quickly give us a patch."
"The major pain point with Zaloni is that their exception handling is not good. If any event happens, it doesn't tell you at which point it failed and it doesn't tell the operations team how they should take corrective actions unless you call Zaloni and then identify the issues. That is one issue."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Data Preparation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Pharma/Biotech Company
15%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Construction Company
10%
Healthcare Company
9%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Revvity Signals Notebook?
If I could suggest improvements for Revvity Signals Notebook, I would implement a technology inside Signals to extract data more easily. I know they have Signals Connect, and they can manage all th...
What is your primary use case for Revvity Signals Notebook?
My main use case for Revvity Signals Notebook is as an admin for the company and also as a simple user for the process development of my company, which focuses on chemical process development. A sp...
What advice do you have for others considering Revvity Signals Notebook?
I trust the Signals support team regarding collaboration and data security, although I am not entirely certain about the security of Revvity. My advice for others looking into using Revvity Signals...
Ask a question
Earn 20 points
 

Comparisons

 

Also Known As

No data available
ZDP
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
CDS Global, AIG,
Find out what your peers are saying about Revvity Signals Notebook vs. Zaloni Data Platform and other solutions. Updated: March 2026.
885,311 professionals have used our research since 2012.