IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why
  • Home
  • RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs. SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server

RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Featured Review
Anonymous User
I found it easy to work with although I had no prior experience
Control-M ensures that our files are secure and the data pipeline is accessible. It helps. It also allows us to create and monitor data while... Read more →
Use RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]?
Use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
July 2022
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: July 2022.
DOWNLOAD NOW
620,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The cost is basically $100 a job, give or take."
  • "This is an area where it is a little difficult to work with BMC. They want to do licenses by job, which is what we have. For example, the simplest is to license by job, but they can also license by nodes. While the licensing is simple to use, it might not be the correct licensing model for the customer. It is okay because we want to license by job, which is something measurable. At the end of the day, licensing by job is the most important."
  • "The cost of the hardware is high. Because you need to license each job, it is costly."
  • "You're going to spend a lot of money upfront, but the benefits you're going to get out of it are going to quickly pay for it."
  • "Initially, our licensing model was based on the number of jobs per day. That caused some issues because we were restricted to a number. So at our renewal time we said, 'We want to convert from number of jobs to number of endpoints.' That cost us extra money but it gave us additional capabilities, without worrying about the number of jobs."
  • "BMC's price is based on the number of jobs."
  • "You must accept that BMC licensing can be very confusing. No one can easily understand how they calculate things, whether it is user-based, job-based, or server-based. The calculation is quite tough. How BMC calculates licensing is not easily available anywhere."
  • "There are human costs in addition to the standard pricing and licensing of this solution."

    • More Control-M Pricing and Cost Advice →

    Information Not Available
    Information Not Available
    report
    See Which Vendors Are Best For You
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
    See Recommendations
    620,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    How does Control-M compare with AutoSys Workload Automation?
    Top Answer:Control-M acts as a single, centralized interface for monitoring and managing all batch processes, which is helpful… more »
    What is the biggest difference between Oracle DAC Scheduler and Control-M?
    Top Answer:Hi! I don't know the "Oracle DAC Scheduler", but I can say that in most competitive solutions Control-m stands out in… more »
    What do you like most about Control-M?
    Top Answer:The reporting is top-notch. I haven't found any other applications on the market that can replicate what Control-M… more »
    Read all 46 answers   →
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Control M
    Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, Serv-U FTP Server
    Learn More
    BMC
    RepliWeb
    Video Not Available
    SolarWinds
    Overview

    Control-M simplifies application and data workflow orchestration on premises or as a service. It makes it easy to build, define, schedule, manage, and monitor production workflows, ensuring visibility, reliability, and improving SLAs.

    • Accelerate new business applications into production—by embedding workflow orchestration into your CI/CD pipeline
    • Scale Dev and Ops collaboration, with a Jobs-as-Code approach
    • Simplify workflows across hybrid and multi-cloud environments with AWS, Azure and Google Cloud Platform integrations
    • Deliver data-driven outcomes faster, managing big data workflows in a scalable way
    • Take control of your file transfer operations with integrated, intelligent file movement and visibility
    Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.

    Serv-U Managed File Transfer (MFT) - Remote File Sharing | SolarWinds SolarWinds logo Government Customer... logo Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server Enhance security and control over... “Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is a versatile, easy-to-deploy solution that integrates well into... Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is an excellent and cost-effective solution.

    Offer
    Learn more about Control-M
    Learn More
    Learn more about RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL]
    Learn More
    Learn more about SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
    Learn More
    Sample Customers
    CARFAX, Tampa General Hospital, Navistar, Amadeus, Raymond James, Railinc
    Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm31%
    Computer Software Company14%
    Retailer8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company30%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company27%
    Financial Services Firm21%
    Government9%
    Insurance Company8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company21%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business12%
    Midsize Enterprise9%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business13%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise77%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business15%
    Midsize Enterprise6%
    Large Enterprise79%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business25%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise60%
    Buyer's Guide
    Managed File Transfer (MFT)
    July 2022
    Download Free Report
    Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, HelpSystems, Seeburger and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: July 2022.
    DOWNLOAD NOW
    620,600 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is ranked unranked in Managed File Transfer (MFT) while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is ranked 28th in Managed File Transfer (MFT). RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is rated 0.0, while SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is rated 0.0. On the other hand, RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] is most compared with Kiteworks and SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, whereas SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server is most compared with AWS Transfer for SFTP.

    See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

    We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.