Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server comparison

RepliWeb and SolarWinds are both solutions in the Managed File Transfer (MFT) category. Additionally, 100% of RepliWeb users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SolarWinds users who would recommend it.
SolarWinds Serv-U File Tran...
Read 1 SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server review
  • 242 Views
  • 149 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] and SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, BMC and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT).

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Managed File Transfer (MFT) Report (Updated: June 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 859,687 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

RepliWeb Managed File Trans...
Average Rating
8.2
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
SolarWinds Serv-U File Tran...
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
4.1
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Managed File Transfer (MFT) (19th)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user668928 - PeerSpot reviewer
Its ability to sync data between the servers with minimum downtime is great.
Feature such as its ability to sync data between the servers with minimum downtime, rollback with just a click and replicate website configurations were great This product helped me a lot for deployments day and night. I have never seen a problem with RepliWeb, it's a great product and a reliable…
Read full review
reviewer2292672 - PeerSpot reviewer
The solution can be used for internal file transfer, but its technical support and third-party integrations should be improved
I am comparing SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, WS_FTP, and Wing FTP for my current company. We use the solution for multiple purposes, and it should be user-friendly when integrating something. We cannot always depend on the support team to come and fix the issues. Overall, I rate SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server a seven out of ten.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Managed File Transfer (MFT) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Healthcare Company
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
10%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?
We use SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server for internal file transfer.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?
The pricing of the solution is INR 3,00,000. The pricing of the solution should come down.
See all answers
What needs improvement with SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server?
The solution’s technical support should be improved. The solution's initial setup and third-party integrations could be improved.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
MOVEit vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Logo
MOVEit vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
Compared 50% of the time
GoAnywhere MFT vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Logo
GoAnywhere MFT vs SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server
Compared 50% of the time
More SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] reportDownload RepliWeb Managed File Transfer [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server reportDownload SolarWinds Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
Serv-U File Transfer Protocol Server, Serv-U FTP Server
 

Overview

Attunity RepliWeb is a deployment platform for enterprise server, web operations, shared hosting and data center operations teams. It delivers quantifiable improvements to IT operations associated with deployments. Attunity RepliWeb offloads time-consuming manual tasks by automating processes, speeding release cycles and ensuring content and code continuity.
RepliWeb

Serv-U Managed File Transfer (MFT) - Remote File Sharing | SolarWinds SolarWinds logo Government Customer... logo Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server Enhance security and control over... “Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is a versatile, easy-to-deploy solution that integrates well into... Serv-U Managed File Transfer Server is an excellent and cost-effective solution.

SolarWinds
 

Sample Customers

Wellcare, Couchsurfing, Etix, Colmobil, Tangerine, SM Retail Inc., GDF SUEZ, UnionBanCal Corporation, Pfizer, Software Box Limited (SBL), University of Maryland University College
Information Not Available
Buyer's Guide
Managed File Transfer (MFT)
June 2025
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Fortra, BMC and others in Managed File Transfer (MFT). Updated: June 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
859,687 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Managed File Transfer (MFT) vendors.

We monitor all Managed File Transfer (MFT) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.