Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Red Hat and Canonical are both solutions in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category. Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.9, while Canonical is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.5. Red Hat holds a 6.7% mindshare in OSB, compared to Canonical’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 97% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Canonical users who would recommend it.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...

Read 453 Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) reviews

33,398 Views
32,396 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Read 2 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) reviews

2,387 Views
1,504 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Red Hat Enterprise Linux RHEL and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm target enterprise-level Linux deployments. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm leads in versatility and adaptability for developers, while RHEL excels in stability and long-term support.

Features: RHEL offers enterprise-grade stability, extensive support, and robust security features. It provides comprehensive documentation and a stable ecosystem, focusing on security and stability. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm prioritizes ease of access to the latest software packages, leveraging open-source community involvement for high adaptability and developer-friendliness, with flexibility and cutting-edge features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm simplifies deployment through cloud infrastructure and automation tools, improving scalability. RHEL follows a traditional deployment approach with a solid support infrastructure and detailed technical assistance, highlighting comprehensive support and reliability.

Pricing and ROI: RHEL's subscription-based model ensures ongoing support and updates, leading to a predictable cost structure and strong ROI through stability. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm offers a budget-friendly open-source model, granting higher ROI for cost-sensitive projects through low initial cost and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

453

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

30th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category, the mindshare of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is 6.7%, down from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) is 1.2%, up from 0.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Operating Systems (OS) for Business Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)	6.7%
Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)	1.2%
Other	92.1%

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

Featured Reviews

Gowtham Chettikam

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Automation has transformed daily operations and supports secure, continuous infrastructure

When considering improvements to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), I see one primary area. Within your portal, if you provided more study material along with demonstrations similar to the sessions we are attending, which feature a user-friendly guide, you could incorporate this into your Red Hat console. When I want to install an agent or something else, typing in the console should provide me with clear step-by-step instructions. Throughout the years, installation steps have been available, but regarding AI agents or Ansible automation, I need to verify whether clear information exists. Including this information would be beneficial. Additionally, if you add the sessions that have occurred to your portal or another location, this would help us review them multiple times to gain better understanding. Time is limited, and many sessions occur simultaneously, making it impossible to attend everything. Making these sessions available on your website would be very helpful.

Read full review

reviewer2775897

System Admin at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees

Runs consistently in production and supports reliable backend infrastructure workflows

Compared to any other offering in the Linux world, to me personally, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) is quite similar and doesn't really matter; it usually just works. The differences are usually in support and the Ubuntu Pro plan, which I do not have, but the same applies with Red Hat—you can run it free of charge, but then you lack the support, which is what I do with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) as well, so it runs the same as any other Linux distro. In terms of stability and reliability, I've had none worth mentioning or caused by something that wasn't in my own hands, so that's been fine so far. In my team, I have about seven people managing about 60 to 70 VMs across four different clusters and about 16 nodes. I spread them out very evenly and very thinly. User-wise, I don't really serve a company internally; I sell my service on the open market. I have no idea on the numbers of how many customers I have, but it's in the several thousands that use the machines or the service I host through my infrastructure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Overall, I have loved the experience with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), as I have used Ansible for six years of the seven years I have been doing this professionally."

"We have a very good relationship with Red Hat for support and customer service."

"The security features are better than many other solutions offer."

"With RHEL, we have patching in place, automation in place, and we already know the support."

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) helps me save time in terms of design, deployment, and troubleshooting by reducing turnaround time."

"Because most databases run on Linux, that's what makes this solution so important. If you install a Unix system and want to use a database, you won't have to say, 'I can't find any database to run on this.'"

"The customer service and technical support for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is pretty good."

"Rarely were there stability issues, and we regularly had servers running for three years without reboot."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) pros

"Infrastructure as code, especially with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) or any other Linux distro, is key; if you don't have your IaC, you're going to spend forever maintaining it."

"Honestly, if I had to say the best thing about Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm), as opposed to other Linux distributions, is that there is a lot of software that explicitly recommends running it on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) rather than other Linux distributions."

Cons

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux was not used for containerization due to its mutable nature, unlike CoreOS, a lightweight and immutable Red Hat Enterprise Linux variant designed explicitly for containerization and optimized for running authorization."

"The technical support could be improved to be quicker and of higher quality."

"For using third-party software, such as security scanners or patch management systems not from the Red Hat family such as Azure Patch Management, sometimes there could be improvements regarding support, as it can take a year or one and a half years to receive support for certain RHEL major versions, so partnerships on the Red Hat side and collaborations with Microsoft would help."

"The only area would be in regards to being capable of running on other architectures like ARM. They are about to release a new version that is available to be executed on ARM architecture."

"Improvement is needed for supporting Kubernetes clusters because it is less supported by Red Hat according to my experience."

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) could be improved with more shared storage capabilities. For example, I have multiple RHEL instances, and enhanced storage sharing would be helpful for transferring data between servers."

"Regarding pain points, whenever a customer contacts us, we must spend time with them, log into the server, and provide the information they need."

"I really think that the upgrade policies between the major versions, like from from RHEL 5 to RHEL 6, should be much easier, similar to what is in place for upgrading from RHEL 6 to RHEL 6.8."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) cons

"The only thing I would say maybe could see some improvement is that every once in a while it can be a little bit of a hassle keeping the NVIDIA drivers up to date to prevent any kind of crashes or issues with the NVIDIA drivers."

"I would like to see repository clearance and clarity in the repository, as if you try to get anything from the canonical repo, there tends to be ambiguity in the descriptions and especially the versioning, which makes very little sense."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Its pricing and licensing are reasonable."

"It's expensive."

"Operating in the cloud space, we typically point our customers to pay-as-you-go licensing, which comes through the various cloud providers repository services."

"It's been good, but I don't really get involved with that."

"It is expensive. Everything is. I was happy to get a three-year Red Hat Enterprise Linux contract for our initial rollout."

"They knew we would buy tons of Red Hat Enterprise Linux, so they were a little bit more relaxed. We wanted a thousand licenses, and we could pick those up. We true up. Our license experience has been positive with the exception of having to deal with all of the broken-up accounts, which is as much our fault as anybody's."

"This is a cost-effective solution."

"Its licensing is pretty confusing. There are a lot of subscriptions, and it isn't always clear which subscription is the best, but with their support, it's easy to find the right one."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user281973

Storage and VMware Expert at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 24, 2017

It's improved our company's system environments that run Oracle databases.

Red Hat is mission critical to our environment Red Hat has improved the mission critical environments running Oracle databases, while CentOS has improved our web environment and MySQL. Oracle and SAP Environment and all HPC environments. 10 years No issues Very stable i don´t find any problem…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

11%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

Construction Company

29%

Comms Service Provider

17%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	102
Midsize Enterprise	54
Large Enterprise	321

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) or CentOS?

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is fantastic. It is an inexpensive solution that has excellent security, performance, and stability, and also lots of features. I specifically like that the solution has fe...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)?

When choosing Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), our security requirement was that I am using it on IBM Power servers, which offered a bundle price. That is why I opted for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)?

Regarding disadvantages in Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), the certification cost is a concern for me. The problem with the certification is that its price is high, and it needs to be minimal for ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)?

Regarding room for improvement, I would like to see repository clearance and clarity in the repository, as if you try to get anything from the canonical repo, there tends to be ambiguity in the des...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)?

I'm using Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm). I've been working with Ubuntu for about seven to eight months now, and before that, I had a mix of Windows and Linux system administration, mainly with Red...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)?

My advice or recommendation for organizations considering Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) is to always automate. There is a reason I always push for Ansible, Packer, and similar tools. Many firms st...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ubuntu Linux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 10% of the time

SUSE Linux Enterprise vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 9% of the time

Windows Server vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Linux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 7% of the time

AlmaLinux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Competitors

Fedora Linux vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 16% of the time

Oracle Linux vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 14% of the time

Windows 11 vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 8% of the time

Rocky Linux vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 6% of the time

Amazon Linux vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 6% of the time

More Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

October 2026

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) product report

Buyer's Guide

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

October 2026

Download Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) product report

Also Known As

Red Hat Enterprise Linux, RHEL, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for AWS

No data available

Overview

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) is known for its strong security, stability, automation, and support, making it a choice for entities aiming to improve operational efficiency and integration with cloud services.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers robust tools like Ansible for automation and SELinux for security, with efficient package management using YUM and DNF. It is preferred for critical applications, databases, cloud infrastructure, and virtualization due to its minimized downtime and performance enhancements. Despite its advantages, improvements are needed in pricing, documentation, and the complexity of licensing. Challenges in integrating third-party tools, Kubernetes, and cloud environments are present. Enhancement in live patching, backward compatibility, virtualization, monitoring, and storage is also necessary.

What are RHEL's key features?

Ansible: Facilitates seamless automation.
SELinux: Provides comprehensive security features.
YUM and DNF: Enable efficient package management.
Satellite: Assists in effective management of systems.
Cloud Integration: Ensures smooth integration with cloud services.

What benefits do users find in RHEL?

Minimized Downtime: Reduces disruptions and maintains continuity.
System Performance: Enhances system operations and efficiency.
Compliance: Regular patches ensure standards adherence.
Comprehensive Support: Extensive documentation and support resources available.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is implemented across sectors like telecommunications, finance, health care, and education, often supporting critical environments with rigorous security and management needs. Its compatibility with automation and management tools like OpenShift allows for efficient handling of enterprise demands.

Red Hat

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) is designed for streamlined performance and enhanced adaptability, focusing on delivering optimal efficiency for developers and businesses seeking to leverage robust and secure environments with long-term support.

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) caters to the rising demands of tech-savvy enterprises, providing a stable foundation to enhance productivity through its scalable architecture and seamless integration capabilities. This version is particularly tailored for developers and businesses that require a dependable environment for innovative implementation. By prioritizing security and compatibility, this Ubuntu release becomes a preferred choice for efficient deployment in evolving technological landscapes.

What key features does Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) offer?

Enhanced Security: Delivers rigorous security patches ensuring safety and reliability.
Long-Term Support: Guarantees consistent updates and support for sustained application performance.
Scalability: Adapts efficiently to growing workloads, supporting diverse applications.
Seamless Integration: Ensures compatibility with current systems, reducing implementation hurdles.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with sustainable updates minimizing resource allocation.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances workflow with streamlined processes tailored for business growth.
Reliability: Provides unwavering performance, fostering user trust and system continuity.
Future-Ready: Prepares infrastructure for scalable expansions, safeguarding long-term investments.

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) finds diverse industry applications, notably in tech sectors necessitating stable, reliable platforms for application development. Its robust architecture is crucial in finance and healthcare, where security and seamless data processing are priority, making it a go-to choice for institutions aiming for cutting-edge digital transformation.

Canonical

Sample Customers

Travel Channel, Mohawk Industries, Hilti, Molecular Health, Exolgan, Hotelplan Group, Emory University, BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina, HCA Healthcare, Paychex, UPS, Intermountain Healthcare, Brinker International, TransUnion, Union Bank, CA Technologies

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

November 2026

Free Report: Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) report.

See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.