Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) comparison

Red Hat and Canonical are both solutions in the Operating Systems (OS) for Business category. Red Hat is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.8, while Canonical is ranked #30 with an average rating of 9.5. Additionally, 97% of Red Hat users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Canonical users who would recommend it.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...

Read 434 Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) reviews

29,390 Views
28,802 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Read 2 Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) reviews

1,737 Views
1,042 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jun 3, 2026

Red Hat Enterprise Linux RHEL and Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm target enterprise-level Linux deployments. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm leads in versatility and adaptability for developers, while RHEL excels in stability and long-term support.

Features: RHEL offers enterprise-grade stability, extensive support, and robust security features. It provides comprehensive documentation and a stable ecosystem, focusing on security and stability. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm prioritizes ease of access to the latest software packages, leveraging open-source community involvement for high adaptability and developer-friendliness, with flexibility and cutting-edge features.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm simplifies deployment through cloud infrastructure and automation tools, improving scalability. RHEL follows a traditional deployment approach with a solid support infrastructure and detailed technical assistance, highlighting comprehensive support and reliability.

Pricing and ROI: RHEL's subscription-based model ensures ongoing support and updates, leading to a predictable cost structure and strong ROI through stability. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS Noble Arm offers a budget-friendly open-source model, granting higher ROI for cost-sensitive projects through low initial cost and adaptability.

To learn more, read our detailed Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (R...

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

1st

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

434

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Ranking in Operating Systems (OS) for Business

30th

Average Rating

9.6

Reviews Sentiment

5.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Featured Reviews

Gowtham Chettikam

Vice President at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Automation has transformed daily operations and supports secure, continuous infrastructure

When considering improvements to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), I see one primary area. Within your portal, if you provided more study material along with demonstrations similar to the sessions we are attending, which feature a user-friendly guide, you could incorporate this into your Red Hat console. When I want to install an agent or something else, typing in the console should provide me with clear step-by-step instructions. Throughout the years, installation steps have been available, but regarding AI agents or Ansible automation, I need to verify whether clear information exists. Including this information would be beneficial. Additionally, if you add the sessions that have occurred to your portal or another location, this would help us review them multiple times to gain better understanding. Time is limited, and many sessions occur simultaneously, making it impossible to attend everything. Making these sessions available on your website would be very helpful.

Read full review

reviewer2775897

System Admin at a comms service provider with 501-1,000 employees

Runs consistently in production and supports reliable backend infrastructure workflows

Compared to any other offering in the Linux world, to me personally, Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) is quite similar and doesn't really matter; it usually just works. The differences are usually in support and the Ubuntu Pro plan, which I do not have, but the same applies with Red Hat—you can run it free of charge, but then you lack the support, which is what I do with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) as well, so it runs the same as any other Linux distro. In terms of stability and reliability, I've had none worth mentioning or caused by something that wasn't in my own hands, so that's been fine so far. In my team, I have about seven people managing about 60 to 70 VMs across four different clusters and about 16 nodes. I spread them out very evenly and very thinly. User-wise, I don't really serve a company internally; I sell my service on the open market. I have no idea on the numbers of how many customers I have, but it's in the several thousands that use the machines or the service I host through my infrastructure.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The stability and quality of their service are very good."

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) definitely helps to mitigate downtime; we reboot our servers twice a year and do our patches, and that helps reduce our risk of exposure to malware, worms, viruses, but also increases our uptime."

"Since Red Hat is known as a popular option for many of our customers, it provides a standardized platform for us to deliver products on."

"The built-in security features are quite good."

"Release updates are the most valued feature because Red Hat's rigorously tested release update pipeline sets it apart from other distributions."

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) features save us a ton of time and money from engineer hours working on security and infrastructure operations because Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) works out of the box, does what we want it to do, and does it well."

"The features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) that I most appreciate include the easy package management and the straightforward upgrades; the stability and support are also impressive, and in my particular applications, it's not allowed to be down for more than five minutes consecutively, so it's helping me meet my requirement."

"The most valuable aspects of Red Hat Enterprise Linux are its flexibility and security."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) pros

"Honestly, if I had to say the best thing about Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm), as opposed to other Linux distributions, is that there is a lot of software that explicitly recommends running it on Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) rather than other Linux distributions."

"Infrastructure as code, especially with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) or any other Linux distro, is key; if you don't have your IaC, you're going to spend forever maintaining it."

Cons

"It is mostly better than other solutions. However, it is sometimes difficult for disaster recovery, so we have to plan accordingly."

"Their support needs improvement. It should be faster for priority tickets."

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux's SELinux can be challenging to manage and troubleshoot, often causing frustration."

"Adding more relevant features to Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) would be great. I have seen some issues on GitHub where people are suggesting things, such as Ansible."

"There can be a faster resolution. When we have production issues, they take around 30 to 60 minutes to come up with a solution. It would be quite helpful if their response is faster. They are also not reachable over the phone, so we need to wait for their callback for the ticket."

"Right now, we need to get memory and CPU via the console."

"There was a reduction in the amount of detail provided in backlog messages between Red Hat Enterprise Linux versions six and seven, compared to versions eight and nine."

"The subscription and licensing model can be a bit complex for new users, and some enterprise features have a steep learning curve."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) cons

"The only thing I would say maybe could see some improvement is that every once in a while it can be a little bit of a hassle keeping the NVIDIA drivers up to date to prevent any kind of crashes or issues with the NVIDIA drivers."

"I would like to see repository clearance and clarity in the repository, as if you try to get anything from the canonical repo, there tends to be ambiguity in the descriptions and especially the versioning, which makes very little sense."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We have moved to the Simple Content Access (SCA) model. It is much easier to do renewals and see how I am using my licenses. I used to have to do it all by hand. It would take me a good couple of hours every few months to make sure that we were up to snuff on everything. However, with the new model that they have, this is very easy. I just go to cloud.redhat.com to look and see how I am utilizing my licenses. If I am running out of bounds, I can find out why. If it is simply that we have images that need to be removed, we remove those images. If we need to buy more licenses, then we can start the process of purchasing more licenses."

"Licensing is the most attractive part of it. With Red Hat Insights and Ansible, we now know that it was done with the intention of simplifying the licensing so that you get the support for what you have and not necessarily what you want to have."

"For me, it is not too bad, but my company pays the bill, so I do not worry too much about it."

"It's been good, but I don't really get involved with that."

"Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers a straightforward pricing and licensing model."

"Pricing is sometimes an issue for our clients because it's not a cheap solution. The different licenses have a high cost, and perhaps they could improve by offering different kinds of discounts or lowering the price to make this solution more appealing compared to other cloud providers."

"It seems to be fair. It is not overpriced."

"The pricing and licensing are a bit higher for Red Hat Enterprise because we're able to get 70% of its features with the CentOS version. For the 30% of features that Red Hat provides, I think they need to reduce the licensing fee."

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Operating Systems (OS) for Business solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user281973

Storage and VMware Expert at a comms service provider with 1,001-5,000 employees

Aug 24, 2017

It's improved our company's system environments that run Oracle databases.

Red Hat is mission critical to our environment Red Hat has improved the mission critical environments running Oracle databases, while CentOS has improved our web environment and MySQL. Oracle and SAP Environment and all HPC environments. 10 years No issues Very stable i don´t find any problem…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Construction Company

35%

Comms Service Provider

15%

Outsourcing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	93
Midsize Enterprise	49
Large Enterprise	312

No data available

Questions from the Community

Which would you choose - RHEL (Red Hat Enterprise Linux) or CentOS?

Red Hat Enterprise Linux is fantastic. It is an inexpensive solution that has excellent security, performance, and stability, and also lots of features. I specifically like that the solution has fe...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)?

I would rate the price for Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) quite high because in my part of the world, payments are made in dollars, and buying Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) comes at a significan...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)?

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) can improve the pricing a little bit, but nothing else comes to mind.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)?

Regarding room for improvement, I would like to see repository clearance and clarity in the repository, as if you try to get anything from the canonical repo, there tends to be ambiguity in the des...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)?

I'm using Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm). I've been working with Ubuntu for about seven to eight months now, and before that, I had a mix of Windows and Linux system administration, mainly with Red...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)?

My advice or recommendation for organizations considering Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) is to always automate. There is a reason I always push for Ansible, Packer, and similar tools. Many firms st...

See all answers

Comparisons

Ubuntu Linux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 10% of the time

SUSE Linux Enterprise vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 9% of the time

Windows Server vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 8% of the time

AlmaLinux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 7% of the time

Oracle Linux vs Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

Compared 7% of the time

More Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) Competitors

Fedora Linux vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 19% of the time

Oracle Linux vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 17% of the time

Windows 11 vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon Linux vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 7% of the time

Rocky Linux vs Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Compared 6% of the time

More Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL)

July 2026

Download Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) product report

Buyer's Guide

Operating Systems (OS) for Business

July 2026

Download Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) product report

Also Known As

Red Hat Enterprise Linux, RHEL, Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) for AWS

No data available

Overview

Red Hat Enterprise Linux offers stability, security, and support for mission-critical applications with robust tools and scalable architecture, ideal for diverse environments and hybrid cloud compatibility.

Red Hat Enterprise Linux provides organizations with a reliable platform ideal for high-performance computing and virtualization. Known for its robust security and seamless network administration, it integrates well with OpenShift and Ansible, ensuring adaptability and scalability. Despite challenges with documentation, upgrade complexity, and cost, RHEL remains a formidable choice thanks to its comprehensive documentation and extensive community support.

What are the key features of Red Hat Enterprise Linux?

Stability and Security: Maintains high stability and advanced security measures, critical for enterprise environments.
Extensive Support: Offers robust support through community and documentation, assisting with problem-solving and integration.
Automation with Ansible: Simplifies tasks and enhances efficiency, optimizing operations across the infrastructure.
Hybrid Cloud Compatibility: Supports cloud environments, enabling flexibility and strategic deployments.
Scalable Architecture: Adapts to different workloads, making it suitable for growing organizational demands.

What benefits should users look for when evaluating Red Hat Enterprise Linux?

Reliable Performance: Ensures consistent and secure operations across diverse environments, including cloud infrastructure.
Efficient Management: Centralized operations make it easy to manage enterprise workloads effectively.
Community and Documentation: Access to a strong community and comprehensive documentation aids in resolving issues.
Integration Capabilities: Easily integrates with technologies like OpenShift and SAP, enhancing operational versatility.
Adaptability: Supports a wide range of environments and technical requirements, improving strategic deployment.

Organizations across industries like financial services, telecommunications, and application hosting implement Red Hat Enterprise Linux for server and application management. Its compatibility with technologies such as SAP, Oracle, and Ansible supports functions including web, database, and enterprise solutions, ensuring stable and secure performance in high-pressure environments.

Red Hat

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) is designed for streamlined performance and enhanced adaptability, focusing on delivering optimal efficiency for developers and businesses seeking to leverage robust and secure environments with long-term support.

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) caters to the rising demands of tech-savvy enterprises, providing a stable foundation to enhance productivity through its scalable architecture and seamless integration capabilities. This version is particularly tailored for developers and businesses that require a dependable environment for innovative implementation. By prioritizing security and compatibility, this Ubuntu release becomes a preferred choice for efficient deployment in evolving technological landscapes.

What key features does Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) offer?

Enhanced Security: Delivers rigorous security patches ensuring safety and reliability.
Long-Term Support: Guarantees consistent updates and support for sustained application performance.
Scalability: Adapts efficiently to growing workloads, supporting diverse applications.
Seamless Integration: Ensures compatibility with current systems, reducing implementation hurdles.

What benefits and ROI can users expect from Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)?

Cost Efficiency: Reduces expenses with sustainable updates minimizing resource allocation.
Operational Efficiency: Enhances workflow with streamlined processes tailored for business growth.
Reliability: Provides unwavering performance, fostering user trust and system continuity.
Future-Ready: Prepares infrastructure for scalable expansions, safeguarding long-term investments.

Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) finds diverse industry applications, notably in tech sectors necessitating stable, reliable platforms for application development. Its robust architecture is crucial in finance and healthcare, where security and seamless data processing are priority, making it a go-to choice for institutions aiming for cutting-edge digital transformation.

Canonical

Sample Customers

Travel Channel, Mohawk Industries, Hilti, Molecular Health, Exolgan, Hotelplan Group, Emory University, BlueCross BlueShield of North Carolina, HCA Healthcare, Paychex, UPS, Intermountain Healthcare, Brinker International, TransUnion, Union Bank, CA Technologies

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

August 2026

Free Report: Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm)

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL) vs. Ubuntu 24.04 LTS - Noble (Arm) report.

See our list of best Operating Systems (OS) for Business vendors.

We monitor all Operating Systems (OS) for Business reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.