No more typing reviews! Try our Samantha, our new voice AI agent.

Rapid7 Exposure Command vs WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 18, 2026

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Rapid7 Exposure Command
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
19th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
5.2
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Attack Surface Management (ASM) (23rd)
WithSecure Elements Exposur...
Ranking in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
27th
Average Rating
10.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.6
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
Vulnerability Management (79th), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (37th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of June 2026, in the Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) category, the mindshare of Rapid7 Exposure Command is 2.1%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM) is 0.9%. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) Mindshare Distribution
ProductMindshare (%)
Rapid7 Exposure Command2.1%
WithSecure Elements Exposure Management (XM)0.9%
Other97.0%
Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM)
 

Featured Reviews

AK
Senior Project Manager at Infosys
Automation has improved vulnerability insights and supports timely reporting for remediation teams
Rapid7 Exposure Command is not as easy to deploy compared to Qualys, and the detection rates are lower than Qualys. Rapid7 Exposure Command is not exactly complex, but it is medium complex when I compare it to Qualys, where the deployment procedure is quite straightforward. Detection needs more depth in Rapid7 Exposure Command, and when I compare it with Qualys, the output of vulnerabilities can be improved at a depth level. That is one of the major pieces of feedback I have. The detection rate of vulnerabilities is not up to par, and that is one of the most important things that every firm looks for.
PP
System Specialist at Fix-Forum Oy
Stable, scalable, and can be deployed on both cloud and on-premises
We usually need the solution to have extra protection against data breaches, as we have seen with our customers. The solution is deployed on the public cloud The solution works both outside and on-premises of the company, thus preventing secondary breaches from reaching the company's data. The…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Compared to Tenable or Qualys, Rapid7 Exposure Command is definitely affordable for small-sized or mid-sized engagements, although there are some challenges with detection."
"The solution works both outside and on-premises of the company, thus preventing secondary breaches from reaching the company's data."
 

Cons

"Rapid7 Exposure Command is not as easy to deploy compared to Qualys, and the detection rates are lower than Qualys."
"The cost of the solution has room for improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"The cost of the solution is mid-ranged but worth the price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM) solutions are best for your needs.
899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Educational Organization
11%
Construction Company
11%
Healthcare Company
11%
Computer Software Company
7%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Interactive Demo

Demo not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Zafran Security, Pentera, Wiz and others in Continuous Threat Exposure Management (CTEM). Updated: May 2026.
899,645 professionals have used our research since 2012.