Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] vs Veritas NetBackup comparison

Quest Software and Veritas are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 90% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Veritas users who would recommend it.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Read 20 Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Veritas NetBackup

Read 119 Veritas NetBackup reviews

9,778 Views
8,996 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Veritas NetBackup

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Veritas NetBackup and Quest Rapid Recovery compete in the backup and recovery solutions sector. Veritas NetBackup seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and flexibility across various environments.

Features: Veritas NetBackup is acknowledged for its extensive features like deduplication, robust backup solutions, and advanced recovery options, offering reliability and flexibility. Quest Rapid Recovery is noted for its ease of use in virtual environments, featuring point-in-time recovery and efficient recovery functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Veritas NetBackup can improve by simplifying its licensing structure and integrating better with cloud platforms. Quest Rapid Recovery needs enhancements in physical backups, database support, and an expansion of its feature set to compete with larger solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veritas NetBackup supports various deployment models, including hybrid and private cloud, though initial setup may be complex. Its customer service gets mixed responses for responsiveness. Quest Rapid Recovery is easier to deploy on-premises with well-regarded customer service, but lacks cloud deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Veritas NetBackup is considered expensive with a complex licensing model but offers high ROI due to reliable data recovery. Quest Rapid Recovery, while also on the higher end, is deemed more cost-effective for straightforward operations, with a fair ROI considering efficient data recovery.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: July 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

July 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 909,153 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veritas NetBackup

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

119

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (8th)

Featured Reviews

Adam Augustín

Country Manager at Prianto Ltd

Granular recovery, replication is good and offers good speed

It is for any kind of company that uses their own servers. From a global perspective, our clients are small-sized companies. All the SMEs, compared to the Slovakian market, are quite small. It's a small market with small companies. They just want to enhance security and follow regulations It's…

Read full review

SunilPanigrahi

Senior Manager at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

Unified backups have protected virtual machines and applications and optimize storage efficiency

Regarding automated disaster recovery, we have not used Veritas NetBackup automated disaster recovery because according to the RFP terms and conditions, we are not supposed to have automated failover or failback, as we are a government entity and cannot violate the rules of the RFP. My feedback about granular recovery in Veritas NetBackup is that we have been doing verifications of the backed-up data to restore from point to point and time to time, focusing on file level or database level. When it comes to integration with cloud services, we have not started because we are a government entity and are not allowed to store any data in the cloud at this time. From security concerns regarding what I would improve about Veritas NetBackup, I think you need to look into this because we found only one encryption option available, which is not that very strong. When I initiate a backup from my laptop or server to the appliance or the tape media using Veritas NetBackup, the encryption channels are not strong, and there are not many options available. Whatever is there is by default and not changeable. We cannot modify any encryption facilities, and security is a big concern nowadays, so you need to look into that. Regarding the functionality part of Veritas NetBackup, I think this encryption feature should be stronger and integrated from point to point, not just at specific levels. When I initiate a backup, all the communication channels involved should be encrypted until it reaches the endpoint, meaning from client to server, server to client, and client device.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Definitely, the mount and recovery points are the most valuable, because if someone deletes a file or something, or if something gets corrupted, we can always revert back to an old change because our repository goes about a month back. The ability to roll back files and the ability to roll back servers is really important."

"It is more fully integrated with the hypervisor, particularly with VMware solution, and it is simple to create replica sets to our VR site."

"It has surpassed our expectations time and time again."

"The solution offers a 100% guarantee that if it's backed up you will be able to restore it onto any platform you want."

"Our company survived a ransomware attack and the repository was not encrypted by the Conti ransomware strain, and it enables us to recover complete systems, applications, and data with little or no disruption to the work environment."

"The general backup for replication and virtual standby are the most valuable aspects; it does what it says it does and is a decent tool for not a big budget."

"The data protection strategy varies on a case-by-case basis, but overall, it's doing well."

"Probably the point-in-time recovery is most valuable. The other piece that is really nice is that you can mount a whole server at any point in time. So, you can mount the server with all the drives to a Z drive or something like that. It will just mount it all up, and your data is accessible right there on one drive, which is nice."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pros

"It provides us with the versatility to back up everything we require which eliminates the need for a secondary backup solution."

"The backup speed is extremely high and the simplicity of NetBackup is commendable."

"Logs are very easy to read, parse, and use for diagnostics."

"The reporting is very good, with all of the details highlighted and very clear."

"I would give NetBackup a 10 out of 10 for scalability."

"We were evaluating other products and getting confused between Commvault and Veritas NetBackup. The one reason that we started with Veritas NetBackup is the pricing of the license. There's no other reason from a technical perspective or even operation or capability of the two software. The main reason we chose Veritas NetBackup was that in our use case it is more cost-effective."

"Based on my experience of using enterprise-grade backup solutions for a long time, easy management and deployment generally don't happen for enterprises, but in the end we are able to get features, such as easy management and combined centralized management, with Veritas."

"The most valuable features are the VMware VADP backups and the support for data domains."

More Veritas NetBackup pros

Cons

"In terms of what needs improvement in Quest Rapid Recovery, though the solution is seamless, right now, they are just giving the software which means we'll need to arrange the hardware. If they can combine the appliance and software, that would be a great approach. In the next release of Quest Rapid Recovery, it would be great if they'd add a folder backup feature because only a snapshot backup feature is available at the moment."

"It is expensive. If you do not need physical backups, it is expensive for basic virtual backups."

"I think the self-paced learning and knowledge base can always be improved so that users can self-service without having to contact either a reseller or Quest. I know there are things that I would have been looking for to try and solve. And the only way I could get there was to actually open a ticket rather than go through self-service through the portal."

"It's not really Quest's fault, but the only issue that I had during the time when I was doing a lot of our restores is whenever the server reboots, it has to bring all of the repositories back in again, which takes around five to six hours to pull eight terabytes back in again."

"I don't really think that there is a whole lot that needs to be changed. It would be nice if you could deploy the agent without having to reboot. When I upgraded my core to the latest version, I also wanted to update all of my servers, but I had to put that off because I can't just shoot it out there. I have to make sure it is at a time when I can do a reboot right away."

"It's very expensive which is why I want to drop it."

"The on-premises deployment model shouldn't have a maintenance fee. If there's going to be technical support, they need it to be free or it should be paid on upon adopting the solution."

"Rapid Recovery can only backup the machine or disc, but it can't back up from folders, and files, and things like that."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] cons

"The solution's technical support process should be improved."

"I also think they could improve the reporting. They use a web-based software application OpsCenter for the reporting and I see that they haven't made any changes in years."

"It was very complicated, and it required a lot of work in terms of management. We have moved to Rubrik. One of the reasons for getting rid of Veritas NetBackup was the fact that at one point, we had the support staff with 12 to 15 people to manage Veritas NetBackup, whereas, with Rubrik, I'm the only one managing Rubrik. There is one more person who works with me mostly due to the fact that in case I'm not around, someone else knows what to do, but I'm the only one who is a full-time manager of Rubrik. The complexity of Veritas required a large staff to manage it. We had daily issues that had to be looked into and resolved. A lot of these issues revolved around Veritas' handling of VMware, which is why first we moved VMware off Veritas. After we did that, we were also able to reduce our staff count. Their licensing is a disaster. It is extremely complicated. In most cases, Veritas themselves can't understand their own licensing."

"The ability to use different disk appliance brands as Pure Disk (not OST), such as EMC Data Domain ."

"The ransomware protection needs improvement."

"Support for the solution needs improvement."

"From a technical point of view, all EMC products have to improve the troubleshoot feature like, log should be in human readable format."

"I'm not fully satisfied with the product. It's a little bit complex to manage."

More Veritas NetBackup cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I'm not aware of the exact cost of Quest Rapid Recovery because I'm from the technical team, but in general, the solution is quite competitive cost-wise."

"I don't think the licensing for the product is very expensive."

"Its price is okay. It is reasonable in terms of the way it works."

"I believe the basic license comes with six terabytes, whereas a lot of the other ones are four terabytes. From the price point, it seemed a lot better than the comparative models, such as Datto, Barracuda, and some of the others. I believe Barracuda was about $15,000 for four terabytes, and Quest was around $12,000 for six terabytes. Pricing is based on the period. There is just the maintenance fee that you have to pay annually, or you can pay for a three-year or four-year contract. This includes Premier Support."

"Licensing fees are based on the amount of data that you want to store, which is related to how many customers you want to cover."

"It's very expensive which is why I want to drop it. They charge us per core and we have a six-core server. It's expensive to pay for maintenance charges. I want to switch to something cheaper."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"When I purchased the change to the license, it was $1,600. I think that was for changing the license. I don't believe that I had to purchase technical support in a while, so I must've bought maybe for five years, but I don't feel there was a huge cost involved in technical support. Its cost was definitely worth it because we've had a fantastic experience with them."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pricing and cost advice

"The software and license are very expensive."

"A better price would make this product more competitive."

"So far I can only say that the license structure could be looked at to be aligned as either capacity-based or traditional."

"The licensing fees are expensive."

"If you have a complex environment with dozens of different servers and apps, I recommend you look for TB licensing."

"Licensing fees are charged based on the number of CPU cores."

"When we consider the quality and value of Veritas NetBackup, it is worth the cost."

"Veritas NetBackup is more expensive than other backup solutions like Dell Power Protect and Veeam Backup."

More Veritas NetBackup pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Financial Services Firm

13%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Quest Rapid Recovery?

Dell solutions are approximately 30% to 35% more expensive than Veeam.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Quest Rapid Recovery?

The product is expensive.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Quest Rapid Recovery?

We have sold some of the products to our customers, mainly to remove competitors like Veeam and also other appliances that do not have the whole package integrated into just one appliance.

See all answers

What is the best next generation backup tool?

Assuming you have an onprem ecosystem which runs the VMware, physical systems on Win, Linux and Unix and run both traditional DB's and nosql DB's like mongo, then Netbackup (NBU) will be the right ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas NetBackup?

I would rate pricing for Veritas NetBackup around six, as it is neither high nor low.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas NetBackup?

See all answers

Comparisons

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Iron Mountain Connect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Azure Backup vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 4% of the time

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 9% of the time

Rubrik vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 7% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 7% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 6% of the time

Acronis Cyber Protect vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 4% of the time

More Veritas NetBackup Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

July 2026

Download Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Veritas NetBackup

July 2026

Download Veritas NetBackup product report

Also Known As

Dell AppAssure

No data available

Overview

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] provides easy-to-use backup and recovery capabilities, emphasizing granular recovery and point-in-time restoration with simple installation, data replication, and user-friendly navigation.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] helps manage infrastructure environments with features supporting disk backup, archiving, VM standby, and replication. Despite limitations like sluggish GUI, lack of support for tape and Mac, and high memory use, users appreciate its real-time data replication and strong reliability. The tool is employed in on-prem deployments and aids in disaster recovery, protecting data across cloud and on-premise servers, securing databases, and facilitating quick recovery during failures.

What are Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]'s key features?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with a user-friendly interface.
Granular Recovery: Allows detailed data retrieval.
Point-in-Time Restoration: Enables specific time data recovery.
Real-time Replication: Ensures up-to-date data replication.
Compression and Deduplication: Streamlines data management.

What benefits can users expect from Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]?

Improved Storage Efficiency: Enhanced by archiving and disk backup support.
Flexibility: Utilizing VM standby and replication features.
Reliability: Offers fast emergency recovery with minimal admin burden.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] is integral for industries requiring robust data protection, encompassing crucial server and database backups in compliance-focused environments with SQL databases and Hyper-V hosts, ensuring swift and dependable recovery solutions.

Quest Software

Veritas NetBackup provides comprehensive data protection with features like deduplication and replication, supporting multiple platforms. It's valued for its stability and ease of use, offering reliable integration with cloud and virtual environments.

With a strong focus on ensuring data integrity and protection, Veritas NetBackup is often chosen for its ability to handle complex architectures and wide-ranging system compatibility. Known for its efficient recovery capabilities and security features, the platform seamlessly integrates with several databases and operating systems. While the interface and technical support may require updates, its robust functionality makes it a preferred choice for critical data operations. Users often seek improvements like better cloud integration and enhanced reporting tools to streamline experience.

What are the key features of Veritas NetBackup?

Deduplication: Reduces storage needs and boosts efficiency by eliminating duplicate data.
Replication: Ensures data availability across different environments by replicating data.
Platform Compatibility: Operates smoothly across numerous operating systems and databases.
Cloud Support: Integrates with cloud services, enhancing flexibility in hybrid environments.
Security Features: Offers robust data protection and encryption mechanisms.

What benefits should users review?

Data Reliability: Consistently maintains data integrity and reliability.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex data management tasks with a user-friendly approach.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without sacrificing performance.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines backup and recovery processes, saving time and resources.

Veritas NetBackup is widely implemented across sectors where data protection is crucial, such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Organizations utilize it for backing up servers and virtual machines and ensuring disaster recovery, both on-premise and in cloud settings. It supports archiving and replication processes, efficiently managing full and incremental backups to meet compliance directives and maintain robust operations globally.

Veritas

Sample Customers

PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Tamworth Regional Council, Rhondda Housing Association, Stadtwerke Pforzheim GmbH & Co., Guangdong Aiyingdao Childrens Department Store, Nspyre, Tarrant Technology Partners, CloudRunner

Beta Offshore

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Rubrik and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: July 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

909,153 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.