Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] vs Veritas NetBackup comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Quest Software and Veritas are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Additionally, 90% of Quest Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Veritas users who would recommend it.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Read 20 Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] reviews

90% willing to recommend

Veritas NetBackup

Read 119 Veritas NetBackup reviews

11,225 Views
10,103 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Veritas NetBackup

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 26, 2025

Veritas NetBackup and Quest Rapid Recovery compete in the backup and recovery solutions sector. Veritas NetBackup seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive feature set and flexibility across various environments.

Features: Veritas NetBackup is acknowledged for its extensive features like deduplication, robust backup solutions, and advanced recovery options, offering reliability and flexibility. Quest Rapid Recovery is noted for its ease of use in virtual environments, featuring point-in-time recovery and efficient recovery functionalities.

Room for Improvement: Veritas NetBackup can improve by simplifying its licensing structure and integrating better with cloud platforms. Quest Rapid Recovery needs enhancements in physical backups, database support, and an expansion of its feature set to compete with larger solutions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Veritas NetBackup supports various deployment models, including hybrid and private cloud, though initial setup may be complex. Its customer service gets mixed responses for responsiveness. Quest Rapid Recovery is easier to deploy on-premises with well-regarded customer service, but lacks cloud deployment flexibility.

Pricing and ROI: Veritas NetBackup is considered expensive with a complex licensing model but offers high ROI due to reliable data recovery. Quest Rapid Recovery, while also on the higher end, is deemed more cost-effective for straightforward operations, with a fair ROI considering efficient data recovery.

To learn more, read our detailed Backup and Recovery Report (Updated: October 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Backup and Recovery

October 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,523 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

5.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Veritas NetBackup

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.4

Number of Reviews

119

Ranking in other categories

Backup and Recovery (9th)

Featured Reviews

Ujwal Sawant

Technical Manager at Optimistic Technology Solutions Pvt Ltd

Reliable and efficient for our data backup needs

I would rate the easiness of the initial setup as an eight out of ten. During our initial setup of Quest Rapid Recovery, we encountered some smaller issues, mainly related to version compatibility and system changes. Setting up Quest Rapid Recovery was quick and done within a day. We started by ensuring the required prerequisites were in place. One server was dedicated to Rapid Recovery, and another acted as a proxy for communication. After installing the Rapid Recovery client on both servers and establishing communication, we configured settings and set up a backup schedule, deciding on file-level or full backups as needed. The process was straightforward, making the deployment efficient and completed within a day. One person with the right skills is all it takes for the deployment.

Read full review

SunilPanigrahi

Senior Manager at a logistics company with 10,001+ employees

Unified backups have protected virtual machines and applications and optimize storage efficiency

Regarding automated disaster recovery, we have not used Veritas NetBackup automated disaster recovery because according to the RFP terms and conditions, we are not supposed to have automated failover or failback, as we are a government entity and cannot violate the rules of the RFP. My feedback about granular recovery in Veritas NetBackup is that we have been doing verifications of the backed-up data to restore from point to point and time to time, focusing on file level or database level. When it comes to integration with cloud services, we have not started because we are a government entity and are not allowed to store any data in the cloud at this time. From security concerns regarding what I would improve about Veritas NetBackup, I think you need to look into this because we found only one encryption option available, which is not that very strong. When I initiate a backup from my laptop or server to the appliance or the tape media using Veritas NetBackup, the encryption channels are not strong, and there are not many options available. Whatever is there is by default and not changeable. We cannot modify any encryption facilities, and security is a big concern nowadays, so you need to look into that. Regarding the functionality part of Veritas NetBackup, I think this encryption feature should be stronger and integrated from point to point, not just at specific levels. When I initiate a backup, all the communication channels involved should be encrypted until it reaches the endpoint, meaning from client to server, server to client, and client device.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Definitely, the mount and recovery points are the most valuable, because if someone deletes a file or something, or if something gets corrupted, we can always revert back to an old change because our repository goes about a month back. The ability to roll back files and the ability to roll back servers is really important."

"Probably the point-in-time recovery is most valuable. The other piece that is really nice is that you can mount a whole server at any point in time. So, you can mount the server with all the drives to a Z drive or something like that. It will just mount it all up, and your data is accessible right there on one drive, which is nice."

"I sleep well at night knowing that our systems are protected."

"Disk backup (archiving to the cloud) is its most valuable feature because it provides for our disaster recovery plan."

"Built-in encryption helps to secure our data as it travels from our on-site server to our off-site backup server."

"It has surpassed our expectations time and time again."

"The most valuable feature is the disaster recovery process from the data center."

"It is more fully integrated with the hypervisor, particularly with VMware solution, and it is simple to create replica sets to our VR site."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pros

"Overall, I think that Veritas is a very good product and I recommend it."

"The backup and restore functions are very valuable aspects of the product."

"The tool's most valuable feature is backups."

"This is the best solution that I know of."

"After ten years of using this product, I can say definitively that it is extremely stable."

"Could be used for both of Physical and Virtual Environments."

"It has been around for so long, and it is very in-depth. It has a solution for everything that you can cover."

"I have found the Media Server Deduplication tool, deployment policies, and agentless features to be the most valuable features."

More Veritas NetBackup pros

Cons

"In terms of what needs improvement in Quest Rapid Recovery, though the solution is seamless, right now, they are just giving the software which means we'll need to arrange the hardware. If they can combine the appliance and software, that would be a great approach. In the next release of Quest Rapid Recovery, it would be great if they'd add a folder backup feature because only a snapshot backup feature is available at the moment."

"There is room for improvement in customer service and support. I would like to see faster response time."

"The terminology didn't seem easily available. When I go to the website, it is hard to search for things. You get all the articles, then you finally get the search button. They need the search at the top of the knowledge base. Then, on occasion, if you get an error message in the system, which is very important, it says, "Click here for more information," but I never get more information. The search engine doesn't find it or it is some weird error. It has never worked for me."

"There could be better space management for incremental data. When you use incremental data, the space in the appliance keeps on going up. There should be a better way to manage the space. You have to manage the incremental data to reduce the time."

"Rapid Recovery can only backup the machine or disc, but it can't back up from folders, and files, and things like that."

"You can only take a snapshot from a virtual environment. It should have the ability to take snapshots from both a virtual and physical environment."

"Sometimes, when we have certain batches for Windows, it needs to be restarted. When it's restarted, the service is configured as a delayed start. Sometimes, you need to wait too long until it rights itself, or you have to do it manually."

"For the most part, it is really good in terms of flexibility and choice of recovery methods. What we found lacking was being able to back up virtual volumes that are clustered. We ran out of luck there. There should be an option for backing up clustered virtual volumes."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] cons

"The SQL Server backup features are not up to date."

"The pricing is high. They need to work to make it lower or more competitive."

"The code base in general could use an overhaul. The base of the product is very old."

"This product would be improved with the inclusion of a Sandbox feature like Veeam Sandbox."

"We have issues reaching them during some hours, and we need to escalate through several levels to get a resolution. Sometimes tickets stay open for days."

"I do not like the way we currently schedule backups. The solution must provide a different way to schedule backups."

"The cost is expensive."

"The licensing costs could be more affordable."

More Veritas NetBackup cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Licensing fees are based on the amount of data that you want to store, which is related to how many customers you want to cover."

"The pricing is on the higher end."

"I don't think the licensing for the product is very expensive."

"Its price is okay. It is reasonable in terms of the way it works."

"I believe the basic license comes with six terabytes, whereas a lot of the other ones are four terabytes. From the price point, it seemed a lot better than the comparative models, such as Datto, Barracuda, and some of the others. I believe Barracuda was about $15,000 for four terabytes, and Quest was around $12,000 for six terabytes. Pricing is based on the period. There is just the maintenance fee that you have to pay annually, or you can pay for a three-year or four-year contract. This includes Premier Support."

"It's very expensive which is why I want to drop it. They charge us per core and we have a six-core server. It's expensive to pay for maintenance charges. I want to switch to something cheaper."

"It is a little expensive. However, I haven't compared it to other solutions. Being a nonprofit, it is always good to have nonprofit discounts on products."

"I'm not aware of the exact cost of Quest Rapid Recovery because I'm from the technical team, but in general, the solution is quite competitive cost-wise."

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] pricing and cost advice

"It was on a yearly basis. During the annual review, when we asked them about our licensing, they couldn't explain it. For example, we had reduced by a factor of 40%, but our license only dropped by 5%. We would then ask Veritas people if we've reduced this much and shut down these servers, why has our license changed so less? They were never able to give us a straight answer. They weren't able to say, "Well, you're using this, and this is more expensive." In many cases, as we reduced our capacity and what we were using with Veritas NetBackup, our licensing actually went up, and they were often unable to explain why."

"NetBackup is expensive. They need to work on the pricing side. I find it comparatively on the higher side when I compare the terabyte backup costs."

"The price is okay."

"The software and license are very expensive."

"When we consider the quality and value of Veritas NetBackup, it is worth the cost."

"If you have a complex environment with dozens of different servers and apps, I recommend you look for TB licensing."

"There is a license required for this solution and it is priced based upon the data used."

"Veritas NetBackup is more expensive than Cohesity and Rubrik, but it is comparable in price to Commvault, IBM, and Dell."

More Veritas NetBackup pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

Performing Arts

Financial Services Firm

13%

Manufacturing Company

Outsourcing Company

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	16
Midsize Enterprise	5
Large Enterprise	2

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	33
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	66

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What is the best next generation backup tool?

Assuming you have an onprem ecosystem which runs the VMware, physical systems on Win, Linux and Unix and run both traditional DB's and nosql DB's like mongo, then Netbackup (NBU) will be the right ...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Veritas NetBackup?

I would rate pricing for Veritas NetBackup around six, as it is neither high nor low.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Veritas NetBackup?

See all answers

Comparisons

NAKIVO Backup & Replication vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

NetVault Plus vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Veeam Data Platform vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

Compared 3% of the time

More Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] Competitors

Veeam Data Platform vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 8% of the time

Commvault Cloud vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 6% of the time

Cohesity DataProtect vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 6% of the time

Rubrik vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 5% of the time

Dell PowerProtect Data Domain vs Veritas NetBackup

Compared 5% of the time

More Veritas NetBackup Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]

October 2026

Download Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] product report

Buyer's Guide

Veritas NetBackup

October 2026

Download Veritas NetBackup product report

Also Known As

Dell AppAssure

No data available

Overview

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] provides easy-to-use backup and recovery capabilities, emphasizing granular recovery and point-in-time restoration with simple installation, data replication, and user-friendly navigation.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] helps manage infrastructure environments with features supporting disk backup, archiving, VM standby, and replication. Despite limitations like sluggish GUI, lack of support for tape and Mac, and high memory use, users appreciate its real-time data replication and strong reliability. The tool is employed in on-prem deployments and aids in disaster recovery, protecting data across cloud and on-premise servers, securing databases, and facilitating quick recovery during failures.

What are Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]'s key features?

Ease of Use: Simplifies operations with a user-friendly interface.
Granular Recovery: Allows detailed data retrieval.
Point-in-Time Restoration: Enables specific time data recovery.
Real-time Replication: Ensures up-to-date data replication.
Compression and Deduplication: Streamlines data management.

What benefits can users expect from Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL]?

Improved Storage Efficiency: Enhanced by archiving and disk backup support.
Flexibility: Utilizing VM standby and replication features.
Reliability: Offers fast emergency recovery with minimal admin burden.

Quest Rapid Recovery [EOL] is integral for industries requiring robust data protection, encompassing crucial server and database backups in compliance-focused environments with SQL databases and Hyper-V hosts, ensuring swift and dependable recovery solutions.

Quest Software

Veritas NetBackup provides comprehensive data protection with features like deduplication and replication, supporting multiple platforms. It's valued for its stability and ease of use, offering reliable integration with cloud and virtual environments.

With a strong focus on ensuring data integrity and protection, Veritas NetBackup is often chosen for its ability to handle complex architectures and wide-ranging system compatibility. Known for its efficient recovery capabilities and security features, the platform seamlessly integrates with several databases and operating systems. While the interface and technical support may require updates, its robust functionality makes it a preferred choice for critical data operations. Users often seek improvements like better cloud integration and enhanced reporting tools to streamline experience.

What are the key features of Veritas NetBackup?

Deduplication: Reduces storage needs and boosts efficiency by eliminating duplicate data.
Replication: Ensures data availability across different environments by replicating data.
Platform Compatibility: Operates smoothly across numerous operating systems and databases.
Cloud Support: Integrates with cloud services, enhancing flexibility in hybrid environments.
Security Features: Offers robust data protection and encryption mechanisms.

What benefits should users review?

Data Reliability: Consistently maintains data integrity and reliability.
Ease of Use: Simplifies complex data management tasks with a user-friendly approach.
Scalability: Adapts to growing data needs without sacrificing performance.
Operational Efficiency: Streamlines backup and recovery processes, saving time and resources.

Veritas NetBackup is widely implemented across sectors where data protection is crucial, such as finance, healthcare, and technology. Organizations utilize it for backing up servers and virtual machines and ensuring disaster recovery, both on-premise and in cloud settings. It supports archiving and replication processes, efficiently managing full and incremental backups to meet compliance directives and maintain robust operations globally.

Veritas

Sample Customers

PRIME aerostructures GmbH, Tamworth Regional Council, Rhondda Housing Association, Stadtwerke Pforzheim GmbH & Co., Guangdong Aiyingdao Childrens Department Store, Nspyre, Tarrant Technology Partners, CloudRunner

Beta Offshore

Find out what your peers are saying about Veeam Software, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Dell Technologies and others in Backup and Recovery. Updated: October 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,523 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.