Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qualitia Automation Studio vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualitia Automation Studio
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (33rd)
Selenium HQ
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (6th), Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Qualitia Automation Studio is designed for Test Automation Tools and holds a mindshare of 0.2%, down 0.2% compared to last year.
Selenium HQ, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 3.5% mindshare, down 4.8% since last year.
Test Automation Tools
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SY
Testing automation solution that is scriptless and is competitively priced compared to other solutions
The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it. Within four weeks, my team was up and running. This was the shortest possible ramp-up that we completed in my entire career The integrations for this…
Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation in testing processes sees improvement with multi-browser support and easier website interactions
Selenium HQ could improve by including a robust reporting framework, eliminating the need for external frameworks. The tool could simplify object identification, enabling users to generate XPaths without requiring detailed DOM understanding. Additionally, an automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the need for manual downloads and updates of browser drivers when new versions are released.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"Selenium has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only."
"The ability to customize our approach to using Selenium HQ is particularly beneficial."
"It's not too complicated to implement."
"Due to its popularity, you can find pretty much any answer in open discussions from the community."
"Selenium is a valuable tool for web testing, and it integrates easily with frameworks like the Gauge framework, making it easier than others. It supports different programming languages, including Java and JavaScript."
"Selenium HQ is a widely used open source tool that makes it easier to understand and automate websites."
"I do recommend Selenium HQ to other organizations because we are in a business that is primarily based on B2B interface."
"Has a good Workday application that enables us to handle some of the custom controls."
 

Cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"There is a need for an auto-healing feature that can address script failures due to changes in the front end."
"It would be better if it accommodated non-techy end-users. I think it's still a product for developers. That's why it's not common for end-users, and especially for RPA activities or tasks. It's hard to automate tasks for end-users. If it will be easier, more user-friendly, and so on, perhaps it can be more interesting for this kind of user."
"I don't have that much experience with it, but I know that Selenium is more used for websites. It is not for testing desktop applications, which is a downside of it. It can support desktop applications more."
"Selenium HQ doesn't have any self-healing capabilities."
"I would like to see a library of bomb files with an automated process and integration with Jenkins and Slack."
"The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn."
"It is not a licensed tool. The problem with that is that it won't be able to support Windows desktop applications. There is no support for Windows desktop applications. They can do something about it. Its user interface can also be improved, which is not great compared to the other latest tools. Anybody who has been working on functional testing or manual testing cannot directly work on Selenium HQ without learning programming skills, which is a disadvantage."
"I would like to see Selenium HQ support legacy platforms."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."
"It is free."
"This product is open source and free. That was a huge deciding factor for us getting into it."
"Selenium HQ is open source and our use of it in our company is provided for free."
"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
"The solution is open-source, so it is 100% free with no hidden charges."
"The pricing is open source."
"Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
"Selenium HQ is a free solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
I will give an eight for my satisfaction with the pricing and licensing costs of Selenium HQ.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SeleniumHQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: August 2025.
865,295 professionals have used our research since 2012.