Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qualitia Automation Studio vs Selenium HQ comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Qualitia Automation Studio
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.4
Number of Reviews
5
Ranking in other categories
Test Automation Tools (33rd)
Selenium HQ
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
113
Ranking in other categories
Functional Testing Tools (6th), Regression Testing Tools (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

While both are Quality Assurance solutions, they serve different purposes. Qualitia Automation Studio is designed for Test Automation Tools and holds a mindshare of 0.4%, up 0.2% compared to last year.
Selenium HQ, on the other hand, focuses on Functional Testing Tools, holds 3.6% mindshare, down 4.5% since last year.
Test Automation Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Qualitia Automation Studio0.4%
Tricentis Tosca20.4%
OpenText Functional Testing8.7%
Other70.5%
Test Automation Tools
Functional Testing Tools Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Selenium HQ3.6%
Tricentis Tosca18.4%
BrowserStack10.0%
Other68.0%
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

SY
Testing automation solution that is scriptless and is competitively priced compared to other solutions
The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it. Within four weeks, my team was up and running. This was the shortest possible ramp-up that we completed in my entire career The integrations for this…
Sujata Sujata Ghadage - PeerSpot reviewer
Automation in testing processes sees improvement with multi-browser support and easier website interactions
Selenium HQ could improve by including a robust reporting framework, eliminating the need for external frameworks. The tool could simplify object identification, enabling users to generate XPaths without requiring detailed DOM understanding. Additionally, an automatic update mechanism for Selenium HQ would be beneficial, eliminating the need for manual downloads and updates of browser drivers when new versions are released.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The best feature of this solution is the fact that it offers scriptless automation. You don't need to know how to code or program to use it."
"It is a scalable solution."
"Selenium has helped to complete tests in less time, which would not be possible relying on manual testing only."
"In general, I would say that the API set is the most valuable feature."
"The plugins, the components, and the method of the library with Selenium is very user defined."
"We found the initial setup to be straightforward."
"The product is quite stable."
"It supports most of the mainstream browsers such as Chrome, Firefox, IE and etc."
"The stability and performance are good."
 

Cons

"The integrations for this solutions could be improved, specifically for Slack."
"One drawback to Selenium is that there is nothing like an object repository, such as that found in QTP, especially considering continuous integration practices that have become common nowadays."
"There is a need for an auto-healing feature that can address script failures due to changes in the front end."
"Selenium HQ can improve by creating an enterprise version where it can provide the infrastructure for running the tests. Currently, we need to run the test in our infrastructure because it's a free tool. If Google can start an enterprise subscription and they can provide us with the infrastructure, such as Google Cloud infrastructure where we can configure it, and we can run the test there, it would be highly beneficial."
"It would be better to have a simplified way to locate and identify web elements."
"The drawback is the solution is not easy to learn."
"There are some tiny issues with SeleniumHQ. For example, with respect to the scraping tests. Sometimes, a website will have some hidden items or blockages that inhibit us from extracting data directly. It would be beneficial if Selenium could extract that information."
"There are stability issues with Internet Explorer only."
"Could have additional readability and abstraction."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is on a higher end but the competition was even more expensive. With this considered, it is a competitive solution."
"Selenium is an open-source solution, and It's free."
"It's open-source, so there's no need to pay for a license."
"It is all free."
"This is an open-source product that can be used free of charge."
"The pricing is open source."
"Selenium is open-source, so there are no setup costs associated with it."
"Selenium is an open-source product. It is free."
"It is an open-source product, it is free for anyone to use."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
869,832 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business41
Midsize Enterprise33
Large Enterprise51
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How do I choose between Selenium HQ and Eggplant Digital Automation Intelligence?
Selenium HQ’s biggest advantage is that it is customizable. Its other most valuable feature is that the driver interface is really helpful and user-friendly; Selenium HQ makes it easy to navigate t...
What do you like most about Selenium HQ?
Selenium's open-source nature is a key advantage. Its extensive support for diverse web technologies.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Selenium HQ?
I will give an eight for my satisfaction with the pricing and licensing costs of Selenium HQ.
 

Also Known As

No data available
SeleniumHQ
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Springer, PTC, ZS, Shaadi.com, JDA, Cbazaar
BrowserStack, Sauce Labs, experitest, Tricentis GmbH, SmartBear Software
Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, UiPath, OpenText and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2025.
869,832 professionals have used our research since 2012.