IT Central Station is now PeerSpot: Here's why

Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager vs SANGFOR Application Delivery comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Questions from the Community
Top Answer:The most valuable aspect of this solution is that it is simple to deploy. The deployment took us ten minutes.
Top Answer:In terms of what needs improvement, the price could be lowered. We've tried to deploy more of them but our purchasing department has said that they're way too expensive and they would prefer to use… more »
Top Answer:It's a load balancer for our front end application. We use the on-prem deployment model.
Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Ranking
Views
426
Comparisons
282
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Views
188
Comparisons
125
Reviews
0
Average Words per Review
0
Rating
N/A
Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, Microsoft and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: July 2022.
620,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Comparisons
Also Known As
SANGFOR AD
Learn More
Overview

Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager is a software-based application delivery controller (ADC) designed to deliver faster, high performance user experience, with more reliable access to public websites and enterprise applications, whether they run in a public cloud, private cloud or virtualized environment, while maximizing the efficiency and capacity of web and application servers.

SANGFOR's Application Delivery (AD) solution, a major update of the traditional load balancing product, integrates the server, link, data center's load balancing and application performance optimization functions, which is the best choice for building a highly reliable and efficient service architecture.

Offer
Learn more about Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager
Learn more about SANGFOR Application Delivery
Sample Customers
AlertBoot, Pernod Ricard, MyBuys, Fusebill, Triboo, Barbri, Cosentry, Gilt Groupe, Maisons du Monde, SUNY – Upstate University Health System, US Markerboard, Colorcon, Juniper Networks
China Construction Bank (CCB), China Telecom
Top Industries
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Computer Software Company36%
Comms Service Provider17%
Manufacturing Company6%
Financial Services Firm6%
No Data Available
Company Size
VISITORS READING REVIEWS
Small Business25%
Midsize Enterprise21%
Large Enterprise55%
No Data Available
Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
July 2022
Find out what your peers are saying about F5, Kemp, Microsoft and others in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Updated: July 2022.
620,987 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is ranked 17th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) while SANGFOR Application Delivery is ranked 19th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC). Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is rated 0.0, while SANGFOR Application Delivery is rated 0.0. On the other hand, Pulse Virtual Traffic Manager is most compared with F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM), Avi Networks Software Load Balancer, Microsoft Azure Application Gateway, HAProxy and NGINX Plus, whereas SANGFOR Application Delivery is most compared with Barracuda Load Balancer ADC.

See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.