We performed a comparison between PRTG Network Monitor and StableNet based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Monitoring Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The single dashboard is a valuable feature."
"We can manage the entire system across the network and troubleshoot the pain points."
"Technical support has been very helpful so far."
"PRTG is integrated on Windows."
"We use the remote probes a lot for our branch offices. Instead of deploying the full instance of PRTG, we'll put a remote probe out there. This simplifies the whole deployment for us."
"The email notifications are helpful, and the dashboards are user-friendly for people with little network monitoring knowledge."
"The product is easy to use and the web interface is fantastic."
"The reporting module is easy to configure."
"The most valuable feature of PRTG Network Monitor is the different monitoring probes available."
"It gives me a live view of the traffic on the WAN."
"The solution is stable."
"We can integrate any tool with StableNet."
"The best features are the reporting, utilization, and network graph."
"The Wi-Fi side needs improvement."
"The technical support needs improvement."
"I would like to see a more robust platform and a new dashboard. In addition, the code is good, but it needs improvement."
"The remote probes seem to be a little bit buggy at times. They just stop working or they say they can't communicate. What we tend to do to is install the remote app onto the servers that we use. That seems to clear it up."
"Integration into service management ticketing systems could be better. They should simplify the integration into big service management platforms like ServiceNow, Remedy, and Cherwell. They're really into monitoring, but they don't do any self-resolution. It would be better if the company moved more into the AIOps space so that you could actually kick off some remedies. I know that you can execute some commands from the tool, but you need to develop those all yourself. It would be really handy if they had some auto-remedy scripts that they could develop on top."
"Maybe in the future there will be room for improvement, but currently, there is nothing pressing that I can think of"
"I would like the ability to monitor Cisco IRS devices."
"It would be good if there were better graphical interfaces when you have it on multiple monitors... Because we have so many servers, things can get lost in the fog a little bit. Maybe having a better way of showing different geographies, Flash, etc., would help."
"When using PRTG Network Monitor it is beneficial if you have prior experience with it, the user interface could improve."
"I would like to see Office 365 monitoring. Essentially, it doesn't do it. I assumed not at all, but apparently it does it slightly. However, due to issues with APIs, they currently don't provide full monitoring for O365."
"The dashboard has a lot of room for improvement."
"The existing dashboard capability is there, but it is not user-friendly."
"The solution is expensive."
More Juniper Mist Premium Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
PRTG Network Monitor is ranked 5th in Network Monitoring Software with 96 reviews while StableNet is ranked 66th in Network Monitoring Software with 3 reviews. PRTG Network Monitor is rated 8.2, while StableNet is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of PRTG Network Monitor writes "It's an all-in-one solution, and net flow is included in the licensing ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of StableNet writes "A highly scalable and stable solution that provides excellent features and can be integrated with any product". PRTG Network Monitor is most compared with Zabbix, Centreon, Nagios XI, SolarWinds NPM and ManageEngine OpManager, whereas StableNet is most compared with SolarWinds NPM. See our PRTG Network Monitor vs. StableNet report.
See our list of best Network Monitoring Software vendors.
We monitor all Network Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.